It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

M U T A T I O N - Friend or Foe of Evolution?

page: 6
5
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 12:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by HappyBunny
 





They are observed as evolution. Have you ever heard of endogenous retroviruses?

I fail to see how an epigenetic causal agent such as lead disproves evolution. Your argument isn't persuasive at all.
There is no proof that evolutionairy changes aren't epigenetic.


Negative proof. Additionally, epigenetic theory rests on both environmental AND heredity.


It doesn't matter the only difference between it being epigenetic or not is the time at which the force strikes. There is no rule that says forces can't attack prior.


Which forces?

A mutation, in order to be passed genetically to the next generation no matter its origin, must be present in the sex cells. If something is present in, say, the liver cells, it's not getting passed on.

Do you understand what I'm saying here?




posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 01:28 PM
link   
reply to post by HappyBunny
 





Negative proof. Additionally, epigenetic theory rests on both environmental AND heredity.
Intorducing lead into ones system is enviromental. Once it changes the genes, it can then also be passed on as well.




Which forces?

A mutation, in order to be passed genetically to the next generation no matter its origin, must be present in the sex cells. If something is present in, say, the liver cells, it's not getting passed on.

Do you understand what I'm saying here?
Sounds like your only referring to sexuall speciation.



posted on Jul, 22 2013 @ 11:38 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics
 
5
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join