It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by moniesisfun
reply to post by TimesUp
i don't think labor camps are probable. people will revolt before that happens. a debt jubilee will result before everyone who's in debt decides to go to one of these camps. the logistics of such a thing make it simply not possible.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913--which established the Federal Reserve as the central bank of the United States--has been amended or altered by the Congress numerous times over the years, but the act has never included an "expiration date" or repeal date. As stated in the law itself, the Federal Reserve Act can only be repealed, amended, or altered by the Congress.
Originally posted by tinfoilman
reply to post by truthofnitrous
Something about the ammo doesn't make sense. Being sarcastic is one thing, but being real for a second.
Even in a collapse I don't think there's anyway they could really use all that ammo on the American people.
They've bought enough for every man, women, and child. Doesn't make sense. Even if they wanted to kill us all, they wouldn't shoot us individually by hand. They could just nuke us and wait for the rest to starve.
Some alternative possible explanations.
1. It's meant for someone else, like the Chinese army. In a total collapse will other countries think we're weak and try to invade us?
2. It's for storage. Maybe they're gonna nuke us and hide in underground caverns? Perhaps they're just prepping themselves.
3. It's to buy up the supply and drive up prices so that when the riots start, we can't get our hands on any to use against the foreign troops they call in?
I think that's all I got right now.
EDIT: Wait, one more.
4. The ammo isn't for anything. It's just a PSYOP to keep us scared of our gov.
edit on 3-9-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)edit on 3-9-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)edit on 3-9-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)