Secret Tape Of Mitt Romney Talking About Buying A Slave Labor Camp

I would add that Communist China has come a long way in terms of the free market economy, and perhaps like Russia, once they get the taste of it, they will not want to go back to their communist overlords. Communism seeks to control the people through excessive Statism and Totalitarian means. Leftists have tried to stop the US from exporting free enterprise to the rest of the world, while globalists seek to enslave people to the NWO.

Originally posted by Kali74
Guard towers to keep people out, might be true... desperate people do desperate things but it seems more likely it is to keep people in. "You seen them?... Oh we've seen them *wink wink*" It even sounded like he actually bought the crap about people being kept out but he seemed most impressed with the model, paying people pennies to make goods that sell for hundreds and thousands of dollars. Let's remember that even if this is to be interpreted as innocently as possible it is still disgusting and pretty soon we Americans will be fighting and begging for jobs and working conditions such as China has. Go Go toxic Capitalism!

In-facing barbed-wire? Guess the verdict is still out along with all the American jobs.

reply to post by Americanist


no surprise at all
it's those Conservative_Southern_Values as usual

Conservative Southern Values Revived: How a Brutal Strain of American Aristocrats Have Come to Rule America America didn't used to be run like an old Southern slave plantation, but we're headed that way now. How did that happen?

North versus South: Two Definitions of Liberty

Michael Lind first called out the existence of this conflict in his 2006 book, Made In Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern Takeover of American Politics.www.powells.com... He argued that much of American history has been characterized by a struggle between two historical factions among the American elite -- and that the election of George W. Bush was a definitive sign that the wrong side was winning. ***
Which brings us to that other great historical American nobility -- the plantation aristocracy of the lowland South, which has been notable throughout its 400-year history for its utter lack of civic interest, its hostility to the very ideas of democracy and human rights, its love of hierarchy, its fear of technology and progress, its reliance on brutality and violence to maintain “order,” and its outright celebration of inequality as an order divinely ordained by God.

As described by Colin Woodard in American Nations: The Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America, the elites of the Deep South are descended mainly from the owners of sugar, rum and cotton plantations from Barbados -- the younger sons of the British nobility who'd farmed up the Caribbean islands, and then came ashore to the southern coasts seeking more land. Woodward described the culture they created in the crescent stretching from Charleston, SC around to New Orleans this way:

It was a near-carbon copy of the West Indian slave state these Barbadians had left behind, a place notorious even then for its inhumanity....From the outset, Deep Southern culture was based on radical disparities in wealth and power, with a tiny elite commanding total obedience and enforcing it with state-sponsored terror. Its expansionist ambitions would put it on a collision course with its Yankee rivals, triggering military, social, and political conflicts that continue to plague the United States to this day.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
I would add that Communist China has come a long way in terms of the free market economy, and perhaps like Russia, once they get the taste of it, they will not want to go back to their communist overlords. Communism seeks to control the people through excessive Statism and Totalitarian means. Leftists have tried to stop the US from exporting free enterprise to the rest of the world, while globalists seek to enslave people to the NWO.

You have the gift of gab... Leftists? Let's inject some common sense and seriously reflect. Who do you think runs Bain, Vanguard, StateStreet, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, GE Financial, The Fed, London Crown Corporation, etc., etc.?

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


No it has not, just how deluded can one person be and not be institutionalized? That's pure GOP horse poop. All the crying you do over how evil communism is and how brutal for the people under it then turn around and condone the exploitation by American Business of those same brutalized people? I guess it's all okay when Romney does or any other piece of trash GOP business crook hmm? I think you might suffer from Leftphobia and delusions of Right Grandeur.

reply to post by DerepentLEstranger


Willie Lynch letter: The Making of a Slave

Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger

 

Willie Lynch letter: The Making of a Slave www.africanamericanimages.com...

fixed

reply to post by Americanist


My disclaimer is that globalists have ruined free enterprise for the rest of us, but that does not change the fact that communist and Marxist radicals hate everything capitalist including free enterprise. They lump free enterprise in with globalist capitalism though. To them it is all the same. I recommend Milton Friedman if you don't understand.

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

No it has not, just how deluded can one person be and not be institutionalized? That's pure GOP horse poop. All the crying you do over how evil communism is and how brutal for the people under it then turn around and condone the exploitation by American Business of those same brutalized people? I guess it's all okay when Romney does or any other piece of trash GOP business crook hmm? I think you might suffer from Leftphobia and delusions of Right Grandeur.

Please feel free to join a communist labor camp if you feel that free market capitalism is enslavement. The collectivist farms of Russia failed in addition to being Totalitarian enslavement. That is just history in case you never read about it.

Here is the alternative to capitalism if you want it.

Stalin's campaign of forced collectivization was a major factor explaining the sector's poor performance. Collectivization relied on a system of internal passports to keep farmers tied to the land. This has been referred to as a form of "neo-serfdom", in which the Communist bureaucracy replaced the former landowners.[1] In the new state and collective farms, outside directives failed to take local growing conditions into account, and peasants were often required to supply much of their produce for nominal payment.
Also, interference in the day-to-day affairs of peasant life often bred resentment and worker alienation across the countryside. The human toll was very large, with millions, perhaps as many as 5.3 million, dying from famine due largely to collectivisation, and much livestock was slaughtered by the peasants for their own consumption.[2] In the collective and state farms, low labor productivity was a consequence for the entire Soviet period.[3]

en.wikipedia.org...

If you would but be honest, you would see that Communist China is still tied to a collectivist ideal, though changing possibly.

reply to post by Kali74


UN Agenda 21 is an attempt by die hard communists to collectivise the entire world from the top down and the bottom up using such harmless sounding concepts as "sustainability", convincing Utopians like yourself that it means happily living out one's life in a Green community where everybody makes the world a better, happier place by conserving, when in actuality, it means herding the masses into the big cities and keeping the rest of the planet "pristine" and free from the "human parasites". If you don't believe me, you should just read the materials. It really means telling such Citizens of the World as yourself how much water you will be allowed to consume by the bureaucrats at the UN sucking off the proceeds of capitalist venture.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


These systems work the same... The main point falls short on a great many thinkers (not implying you're one of them):

I would like someone to explain to me, if they could, how Romney is a free market capitalist.

You see, the problem I have understanding, is that, the system we have today involves Major Corporations and Big Banks, writing legislation and policies via lobbyists or the people higher up the chain in these entities going into to politics in DC to support these lobbyists as well.

These policies kill off the small and medium sized business, whom employ the majority of the people in this country, while the globalist corps and banks reap the worldwind from killing off their competition.

Romney is not a capitalist, but a scavenger, taking over these companies as a result of these very anti capitalist policies because of those running the government.

I don't see how anyone can be opposed to socialist Obama and at the same time support these same socialist corporate and banking institutions that have invaded our government at the tax payers and well being of the nations expense.

That's what happens in communist countries. The ones at the state level reap the benefits while everyone else suffers, and one look at DC and the Major Corporations plus Obama Wall Street Banks verifies this.

Originally posted by belindamck
After viewing the video, it is apparent that he is discussing what he found to be the working conditions in that area of the world! Not that he wanted that type of work ethic, environment or anything of that sort... Watch the video again... just my opinion...

The ONLY reason to want to employ people in that part of the world is to exploit them.

Why do companies move to those countries? Because the living conditions are terrible, they all need jobs, and they can pay them almost nothing compared to what they would have to pay an American at home. Then then make trash for the lowest price, export it to the USA and sell it for the highest price to people who are too dumb to realize how it was made.

It doesn't matter how you or any other Romney-ite try to spin this, capitalists move their businesses there to exploit the people of that nation. That's a simple fact that no rose-colored glasses can hide.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


So you're one of those "free market" types who thinks that capitalism still exists even after your government bailed out banks and corporations?

Fact check - Capitalism (if it ever truly existed) ended when the first bailout occurred. It is hypocrisy to claim that you live in a free market capitalist society when the state is propping up businesses. In a true capitalist system those failed corporations would have been allowed to collapse due to their own failures, and others would have risen to take their place.

Like a forest, when one gigantic tree dies, it collapses, and new saplings have the light to grow. That is how a capitalist system should work. It balances itself, allowing for greater choice and competition in the market. What you think is a capitalist system is actually more similar to fascism - the combination of state and corporate business.

But please, keep on blabbering about "socialism" while completely ignoring that capitalism is dead, it makes people look really clever.

I'll be the first to criticize Romney but this video isn't incriminating in the least. In fact, it shows what little humanity the guy actually has.

Originally posted by Lysergic
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussion in the above linked thread.
Thanks

**Thread Closed**


for future reference:

We Have A New Search Engine--Please Use It!