It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BogieSmiles
The increase in volume of the hot dense ball of wave energy emerging from the big crunch starts the "baking" of the raisin bread . The first raisins that appear are individual patches of standing waves that emerge.
My disclaimer applies but specific questions like that are welcome. My layman understanding falls far short of answering that question except that as I understand it, the LHC is attempting to provide scatter data that will disclose evidence of the decay of the Higgs boson. Finding evidence of the Higgs boson decay will be supporting evidence of the underlying theory and will give science confidence that the source of particles, the source of matter itself, ties in with the hot dense ball of energy/particle-soup that existed in the first instant after the big bang.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by BogieSmiles
What do you think of the higgs field?
Light has different observable characteristics depending on the means and environment of the observations. Particle-wave duality, the photoelectric effect, the single and double slit experiments, the propagation of light through a vacuum, all are valuable observations that are part of the evidence that I include to support my hypotheses.
What are your theories views on light?
From my model, I derive a philosophy that I believe. First, the center piece of that philosophy is that the universe has always existed and if there is any intent, that intent has likewise always existed. Second, there are invariant natural laws that govern the universe, and we have discovered some of them and some are as yet unknown. It is in the area of the unknown natural laws where my philosophy sees an opening for hope or faith in the possibility of eternal intent, but that is not part of the QWC model, it is derived from the model.
Do you think there is any "purpose" towards the existence of universei?
No, if you read my last response to you, you picked up on how the arenas are all interconnected; parent arenas yield new arenas. It implies a life cycle of each arena that includes portions being incorporated in new arenas by the overlap with other mature arenas, and also by the broad disbursal of portions of the parent arenas that don't get included in the new big crunch, but instead drift on through the corridors of continuity to eventually be captured by the gravity of distant and subsequent big crunches. My hypothesis is that because all of that interconnectedness occurs all throughout the landscape of the greater universe, there are no other universes that could come out of nothing, or out of no where that would have different physics. They all are born out of the "stuff" of the preexisting arenas in accord with invariant natural laws that invoke the same invariant natural results.
... or with infinite big bang arenas,, every combination will take place and so ours is just one of infinite forms,, there are no absolutes or nothing special ( unless you think because they are all so unique and rare they are all special)..
Yes.
but do things like the triangle and 1+1= 2 hold over absolutely?
OK, I think he should write a book too .
Originally posted by swan001
The "book" was just a joke, I was teasing CLPrime by suggesting he write a book.
Interresting. As mass is the core of these "raisins", do you think anti-inflation of space (gravity) would be caused by these kind of standing waves? It would imply inflation space is undergoing non-standing occilation.
Originally posted by BogieSmiles
reply to post by ImaFungi
Pretty good for off the top of your head at the spur of the moment.
But your are laboring for a beginning and there wasn't one ... according to my model. Take another look at the PCP explanation I included in this post above. There has always been a potentially infinite arena landscape of active arenas playing out the process of arena action.
You cannot go back to the beginning because no matter how far you go back you just keep finding an infinite past where the faithful arena landscape is maintaining the presence of arenas, and hosting the conditions conducive to the generation and evolution of life.
Eternity in my model applies to the arena landscape that defeats entropy, and the perpetual existence of life.
Originally posted by BogieSmiles
reply to post by ImaFungi
You are beginning to get the picture, but you are struggling with "infinite". Do what you just did, over and over, and sleep on it and start over doing it again, each time starting where you left off, and don't stop, ever, and you are still talking about almost nothing, almost nowhere, almost never relavtive to the infinite. But instead of struggling like that, accept the concept of infinity and apply it to my model, take two aspirins and you can have it by in the morning, lol.
edit on 2-9-2012 by BogieSmiles because: (no reason given)
Its evidential. Take all of the physical evidence we have, redshift, CMB, Hubble view, and the data from sky surveys, and you have evidence that is consistent with my model.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by ImaFungi
ok,, so how do we know our entire universe ( assuming we have not peered out of it/ beyond it... yet) isnt a microchip in gods computer? which would mean the universe,, its laws of physics/ nature,,, would be completely contrived ,, and there exists a more original and prior fundamental reality we can not access or know of?
Originally posted by BogieSmiles
When you invoke the "possible" without the constraints of a methodology, I call it a Friday night model. I work all week to make my model correspond to reality, and then on Friday night I make reality correspond to my model.
Each of us has a time and a place for I unconstrained modeling, and Friday night is reserved for God's all the way up!edit on 2-9-2012 by BogieSmiles because: (no reason given)
Let me let you in on where you can invoke God using my model, if you have enough faith and hope. You acknowledge that there is a boundary between known science and the as yet unknown natural laws. Then you activate hope and faith that it is possible to receive acknowledgements from beyond that boundary; acknowledgements in the form of guidance when you need it, and in the form of positive responses to well intended hopes and dreams that let the future unfold as you would have it. That is the realm of Eternal Intent that is the philosophy that is derived from my model.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
yea, i guess your right,,, Its just that I hope there are gods...
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by BogieSmiles
you should message CLprime to discuss with you,, he knows a lot about a lot...
Gravity is very strong in the close quarters of the early arena, and so particles clump together, atoms and molecules form and they clump together ...
Elaborating on the separation momentum (sorry for the word salad): I think you are looking for more substance on what dark energy force is still operative when the gravitational influence between galaxies is diminished, i.e. the galaxies don't just speed up on their own now do they. There has to be a still unknown force at work, and in my model there is.
Originally posted by CLPrime
BogieSmiles, could you go into a little more detail about what separation momentum is and how it would gain an upper-hand with the dispersion of gravity?