It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well commercial planes fly around 35-40,000 feet, or 12 kilometers up...
18 is about 60,000 feet...
So there's basically a paper saying that chem trails could in theory if high enough effect global warming...
basically we're screwed. In short.
They must be pretty worried if they are going to all the trouble...
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by benrl
Well commercial planes fly around 35-40,000 feet, or 12 kilometers up...
18 is about 60,000 feet...
So there's basically a paper saying that chem trails could in theory if high enough effect global warming...
No. First of all, these aerosols would not be "chemtrails." It has long been understood that dust and ash from volcanic eruptions can screen incoming sunlight, cooling the global atmosphere. Solar radiation management, SRM, would attempt to mimic this process. The technology to do this does no yet exist.edit on 31-8-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)
Im not saying its already happening, I am saying that the theory behind it is sound, that a plane could in theory "spray" a chemical or material that would directly effect the atmosphere.
Originally posted by benrl
...Im not saying its already happening, I am saying that the theory behind it is sound, that a plane could in theory "spray" a chemical or material that would directly effect the atmosphere.
Originally posted by DJW001
For the record, I consider adaptation to be the only safe response to climate change. The Earth's eco-sphere is highly susceptible to Chaos Theory.
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
Originally posted by DJW001
For the record, I consider adaptation to be the only safe response to climate change. The Earth's eco-sphere is highly susceptible to Chaos Theory.
The authors (I'm pleased to see) specificly state that they do not support the strategy they have investigated
I concur.