Romney Threatened Ron Paul With PR A-Bomb! (Great Vid), page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times
Topic started on 30-8-2012 @ 09:27 PM by maddog99
Great interview with Doug Wead that talks about Romney's threats as well as answers to a lot of questions about Jesse Benton's campaign strategy, the voter fraud, and the future of the Liberty Movement. My hat off to Mr. Wead for trying to give us some honest answers.

(15:25) Basically, the campaign decided not to go after Mitt going into Michigan which Doug Wead was in favor of doing. Romney threatened that he would "Destroy The Name Of Ron Paul Forever"!



I think this was a big mistake by the campaign also. What dirt could they have had that wasn't already used to try to hurt RP? They were being cheated at every level and the campaign should have gone out swinging in my opinion.

This makes me dislike Romney even more!
edit on 8/30/2012 by maddog99 because: (no reason given)
edit on 8/30/2012 by maddog99 because: (no reason given)
edit on 8/30/2012 by maddog99 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 06:55 AM by sicksonezer0
reply to post by maddog99


I'm giving this person the benefit of the doubt and saying that their letter 'O' key is broken, or he is doing it to keep his posts unsearchable.


reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 08:09 AM by gladtobehere
reply to post by sirnukeem

Often times, statements or events are relayed through witnesses. This is not uncommon, quite typical in many settings, courts of law for example.

Doug Wead is of impeccable character so this is very believable.

Nor is it difficult to believe. The candidates were constantly running attack ads against each other.


reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 09:40 AM by ErgoTheConclusion
Originally posted by Common Good
What I want to know is- What makes Mitt Romney think that he can destroy a name like Ron Paul?
Is he really that full of himself?

At the level those guys are operating on, there isn't any image they couldn't create of Ron Paul or anyone of us if they wanted to. CG and actors good enough for TV broadcasts is trivial... and there is no evidence as damning as video for the population at large. Especially if it were released via the "alternative media" as a scoop from "someone inside the Paul Campaign that regrets to do this but... has to do what's right..." and only then in an "we told you so" manner would the main media outlets would *sigh* and say "so he wasn't what he said after all... those silly youth and their silly gullibility".

There would be no real defense.

It wouldn't need to convert anyone today that was already in support of the movement. It would only need to create an impenetrable wall between those who still believe and those who feel vindicated for "never falling for that loony"... the youth will get jobs or kids or whatever and lose the ability to be as passionate... years go by and fewer are speaking up on the streets... until eventually the kids of the liberty movement today see the "weirdos" on the street corner talking about "the constitution" waving flags and looking like "hippies" from the 2010's... the parents would disassociate themselves because they wouldn't want their kids to be disillusioned like they were... they want their kids to be "In"...

We can't say we haven't seen it before.

Which is why I think I can see why it was so important to leave the cleanest most positive trail behind possible. There wouldn't have been *that* much to gain in the truly long term for a couple of short term attacks. I think they took the most effective approach in the interest of the long term strength of the movement.
edit on 31-8-2012 by ErgoTheConclusion because: (no reason given)


reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 06:30 PM by preston067
reply to post by sirnukeem


Really ?
I don't understand alot of what I'm reading, But I'm trying.
What I do see and read is this is not right, this seams plain and simple, we screwed! no vote counts


reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 06:30 PM by preston067
reply to post by sirnukeem


Really ?
I don't understand alot of what I'm reading, But I'm trying.
What I do see and read is this is not right, this seams plain and simple, we screwed! no vote counts


reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 06:48 PM by maddog99
reply to post by something wicked


When this person comments obviously without watching the vid or knowing who the person is...then calls him a liar...and his comment is just a poor attempt to troll my thread, I will call him / her out on it.

Why don't you make a contribution instead of just trolling yourself?


reply posted on 31-8-2012 @ 07:02 PM by Bakatono
Originally posted by Labrynth2012
Originally posted by ugie1028
I saw this a few minutes ago. Was going to make a thread but you just beat me to it!

The campaign didn't want to take a jab at Romney at all! This was their fatal mistake imo.

This proves that the bullying (including the conventions) came from the top down.


It proves NO SUCH THING ! Nice try, but NO CIGAR ! What it does prove, if anything, that
Ron Paul and his followers are sore losers and just need to get a grip and follow ROMNEY
into the voting booths to defeat OBAMA, because if they don't and they try to SPLIT the vote,
OBAMA is going to win and America will become a SOCIALIST REGIME.


*sigh* silly people

See, it isn't whether or not romney or Paul won, it is how the game was played.

Romney cheated from the start by stealing Iowa. Yes, he did. Go look it up. Once it was obvious that he didn't win Iowa they tried to hand it to Santorum. They had to keep the illusion alive that no one wanted to vote for Paul. It was weeks and weeks later before we found out who really won.



This was to ensure Paul never gained any momentum.

Here is another robbery:


Here it is in Mass (where romney was governor)


Here is some "reality check" of Romney's lawyers trying to change the rules to make it so Ron Paul is one State short of qualifying for the nomination. It was 5, so they changed it to 8.


Then they stripped Maine of their delegate status since they were going to nominate Paul.

Here is Swann asking Romney about it:


And so on. There are literally thousands of videos dealing with how Romney lied cheated and stole the nomination. It may very well have been his nomination anyhow, even if he played it honestly, but we will never know. No one who supports Ron Paul would have a single issue with Romney if he won fair and square. That is because Ron Paul supporters support Ron Paul because we support honesty and integrity, which are the foundation this country was built upon. We may not have liked the fact that Romney won, if it were fair and square, but we would respect it because that is the way it goes. We can't have it both ways. We believe in the Constitution and the rule of law and fair is fair.

However, Romney did NOT play fair. You can youtube and google all day long and find thousands upon thousands of news articles from mainstream media, local media, news papers, magazines, etc... discussing how odd the primary process was. How ballots were counted in secret locations and how primaries in Ron Paul strongholds were cancelled for no valid reason. You watch hidden video where party chairmen admitted to breaking rules to ensure Ron Paul did not get delegates or win their state. They admit it. You can read about how party chairmen resigned after validating results that everyone knew to be false. Normally they would resign at midnight and sneak away under the cover of darkness.

Then there were these last minute changes at the convention. Ron Paul still may not have won the nomination but they decided to steal the convention to ensure that there was no chance. When Nevada attempted to nominate Paul from the floor, since they tried to disallow his nomination earlier, they simply changed the rules to ensure he could not receive a nomination. They also changed all rules of the repubican party to ensure no more Ron Pauls will ever exist.

They changed the rules to allow the RNC and the candidate of choice to replace delegates as they see fit. This will ensure that no one like Ron Paul will ever get a delegate in the future, no matter how popular they are. The establishment will just replace that person's delegates with delegates of the blessed candidate and that is that.

So, it isn't that Ron Paul supporters are sore losers. It is that we never had a fighting chance. The game was rigged. That, and cheaters suck.

Let me add this last video which goes into further detail of how romney stole the convention. Yes, romney. All activities were instigated or controlled by his campaign lawyers and captains.



edit on 31-8-2012 by Bakatono because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags