It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The GUT
The initial questions raised might find some of the Aviary elements falling into all the categories. But if you, like me, find it highly unlikely that either Dr. Green or Col. John Alexander would go rogue and dump on their allegiances and continued fees as "consultants," then I think we can safely remove two from the list in regards to their main motivations:
Originally posted by The GUT
We're certainly treading in murky--purposely murky--waters here.
Originally posted by Aliensun
All of this interest in "mind work" is done in earnest for the last few decades because of one startling fact that has emerged from UFO abduction cases. That singular fact is that the ETs have incredible powers to control minds at will.
Originally posted by Druscilla
Human-animal chimeras are already a reality. We manufacture mice with human genes (most common), pigs with human genes, and other animals for research purposes.
These animals don't exhibit phenotypical traits, or look human in any way. Their genes are just modified such that they're more human from a cellular biological perspective in reaction to drugs to better gauge reactions and side effects when actual human trials begin.
Mice are a good choice with chimeras because of their rapid development and short lifespans.
If we could do the same with fruit flies to any success, it would be done, but, there's some key differences between insect and mammal that make this impractical.
Some chimeras you've probably heard about are the glow in the dark cats that were modified with jellyfish DNA.
Originally posted by greyer
It kind of sent a chill down my spine when William Cooper said that what the inside does not want us to know is that aliens can control mass amounts of people through religion, magic, and the occult.
The Aviary was behind the show UFO Cover-Up Live
'But, if there is a condition that is threatening to the social structure - like the idea that the aliens are here and they are taking our babies, or that God hates people of a certain creed or colour - and if people who believe in that kind of delusion band together, they can end up encouraging each other to get a lot sicker, or they strap on belts and make themselves human bombs. So we have to know how to deal with these people and how to prevent them from being dangerous to others.
'So, what do we do? There are studies on both sides of the problem. Some show that people will go crazy and jump of bridges when they're presented with this information.
"If you were to give them the core story right off the bat, they'd get sick, so you do it slowly over ten or twenty years.You put out a bunch of movies, a bunch of books, a bunch of stories, a bunch of Internet memes about reptilian aliens eating our children, about all the crazy stuff that we've seen recently in Serpo. Then one day you say, "Hey, all that stuff is nonsense, relax, it's not that bad, you don't have to worry, the reality is this..." - and then you give them the real story."
Originally posted by IsaacKoi
(1) I would not assume that all members of The Aviary had the same motivation(s).
(2) I don't think your posts above result justify a view that either Dr. Green or Col. John Alexander have been shown to have gone "rogue" or "dump on their allegiances and continued fees".
In your research, I assume from this thread and your prior posts on ATS that you've read both "The Mirage Men" and "Project Beta" - but have you also read some of the books on remote viewing which heavily feature some of the members of the Aviary and give an insight into their personalities? If not, I'd be happy to recommend a couple of the relevant books.
We can certainly agree on that. The possible motives for some people making these waters so murky is, however, a point on which different views can reasonably be held.
Originally posted by The GUT
The initial questions raised might find some of the Aviary elements falling into all the categories. But if you, like me, find it highly unlikely that either Dr. Green or Col. John Alexander would go rogue and dump on their allegiances and continued fees as "consultants," then I think we can safely remove two from the list in regards to their main motivations:
1.) They are UFO believers who in their high-clearance careers have heard rumors and have subsequently tried to determine for themselves what the government is hiding in regards to UFOs.
2.) They know the truth and are attempting, out of goodwill, or as part of official disclosure, to get the info out to the public.
3.) They are involved in ufological deception for their own murky purposes apart from any intelligence agency directives.
4.) They are tied to the hip with intelligence factions and their prime directive(s) include ufological deception.
If you find that line of thinking valid, which side do you fall on?
If not, how do you see it?
Col. Alexander, his current connections to intelligence, and why I think he's a true-blue company man coming soon.
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by The GUT
Wonderful post so far.
Neurophysiological science has some important applications that can benefit many, as well as have uses in less than reputable practices.
For the good, grounds can be gained regarding Alzheimer's treatment among other pursuits, especially where stem cell research developments come into play.
Additionally, somewhat on the Mengele side of things, advancements could result in a new and smarter you.
On the downside, we get into programming and control.
There's already a number of social and media mechanisims in place and pervasive in Western culture for the generalized control, and influence of populations and groups.
Much of this can be seen with the prevalence of social networks. Influence the groups through memes, manufactured popular opinion, customized advertising, media stories, and you essentially own your own human bot-net.
Human-animal chimeras are already a reality. We manufacture mice with human genes (most common), pigs with human genes, and other animals for research purposes.
These animals don't exhibit phenotypical traits, or look human in any way. Their genes are just modified such that they're more human from a cellular biological perspective in reaction to drugs to better gauge reactions and side effects when actual human trials begin.
Mice are a good choice with chimeras because of their rapid development and short lifespans.
If we could do the same with fruit flies to any success, it would be done, but, there's some key differences between insect and mammal that make this impractical.
Some chimeras you've probably heard about are the glow in the dark cats that were modified with jellyfish DNA.