It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Iran has doubled the number of uranium enrichment machines it has in an underground bunker, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Thursday, showing Tehran's defiance towards Western pressure to stop its atomic work and the threat of Israeli attack.
Originally posted by diddy1234
looks like 'team America' will be going in there then.
f### yehedit on 30/8/2012 by diddy1234 because: (no reason given)
The NPT is often seen to be based on a central bargain: “the NPT non-nuclear-weapon states agree never to acquire nuclear weapons and the NPT nuclear-weapon states in exchange agree to share the benefits of peaceful nuclear technology and to pursue nuclear disarmament aimed at the ultimate elimination of their nuclear arsenals”
Originally posted by miniatus
and I responded by pointing out that Iran has not allowed the inspectors in all of the areas they wished to inspect ( and suspect )... Basically it's like you kill someone and hide them in your closet, then you allow your house to be searched everywhere EXCEPT the closet.. they can say they found no evidence, but it doesn't mean you're not hiding something ..
Originally posted by miniatusThere is no need for Iran to have enrichment capabilities... they claim it's for peaceful purposes
Originally posted by miniatusUnfortunately the UN has no teeth however.. they just like to issue warnings and sternly worded letters .. Iran knows that ...
Originally posted by diddy1234
it was a flippant remark due to the fact that the American government likes to wade into any country that doesn't do as America says.
also I think the American government wants to do some payback for the American embassy hostage issue.
Originally posted by TheMindWar
reply to post by CALGARIAN
And they know this because they have been allowed access?
Or do they have xray vision that can see like superman?
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT, is a landmark international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament.
Key articles
Article I: Each nuclear-weapons state (NWS) undertakes not to transfer, to any recipient, nuclear weapons, or other nuclear explosive devices, and not to assist any non-nuclear weapon state to manufacture or acquire such weapons or devices.
Article II: Each non-NWS party undertakes not to receive, from any source, nuclear weapons, or other nuclear explosive devices; not to manufacture or acquire such weapons or devices; and not to receive any assistance in their manufacture.
Article III: Each non-NWS party undertakes to conclude an agreement with the IAEA for the application of its safeguards to all nuclear material in all of the state's peaceful nuclear activities and to prevent diversion of such material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
Article IV:
1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty.
2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
Article VI: The states undertake to pursue "negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament", and towards a "Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control".
Article X. Establishes the right to withdraw from the Treaty giving 3 months' notice. It also establishes the duration of the Treaty (25 years before 1995 Extension Initiative).
Originally posted by buster2010
reply to post by GarrusVasNormandy
What's your proof of what you are saying is true. Wikipedia
North Korea has intensified its cooperation with Iran this year and supplied it with a computer program that could help the Islamic Republic build nuclear weapons, a German newspaper reported on Wednesday, citing western intelligence sources.
The Sueddeutsche said the program, called Monte Carlo N-Particle Extended, or MCNPX 2.6.0., was used widely for civilian purposes but is subject to strict export controls because it can also be used to develop atomic weapons.
It is unclear how North Korea got hold of the software.
Originally posted by GarrusVasNormandy
Iran hasn't made anything hostile or shown to possess anything illegal in relation to the NPT and IAEA agreements, but the fact that they are hiding information,..., and the fact they block access to important facilities that raise suspicions, does make their case hard to defend.
What information are they hiding and which facilities are they blocking?
The head of the UN nuclear agency called on Iran yesterday to sign a deal giving greater transparency on its nuclear drive and announced that new talks with Tehran would be held this week.
“Iran is not providing the necessary cooperation to enable the agency to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran, and therefore to conclude that all nuclear material in Iran is in peaceful activities,” he told the board of governors. He also urged Iran “to provide access to the Parchin site,” where the IAEA believes suspicious testing has been carried out.
After a visit to Tehran on May 21, where he met Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, Amano had said an accord could be signed “quite soon,” but there is still no sign of any deal two weeks on.
Please get ALL your facts straight.
The installations Iran doesn't allow access to are MILITARY installations.
There is a additional protocol, which was not ratified by Iran, so they don't have to grant access to those.
PLUEEEEZE! You have studyed history have you?
Only two nuclear weapons have been used in the course of warfare, both by the United States near the end of World War II. On 6 August 1945, a uranium gun-type fission bomb code-named "Little Boy" was detonated over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, on 9 August, a plutonium implosion-type fission bomb code-named "Fat Man" was exploded over Nagasaki, Japan. These two bombings resulted in the deaths of approximately 200,000 Japanese people—mostly civilians—from acute injuries sustained from the explosions.[3] The role of the bombings in Japan's surrender, and their ethical status, remain the subject of scholarly and popular debate.
Incorrect - Iran supports Hamas / Hezzbullah who attack Israel. Secondly if you research Iran going way back you will find they have attacked others.
Originally posted by waveydavey
Seriously who cares anymore? I don't care what Iran has or has not got, they haven't attacked anybody ever.
Because the last time the US tried to remain neutral it resulted in 2 world wars.
Originally posted by waveydavey
Yet the world police, USA,
If you are going to play stickball in Brooklynn you better know the rules. Japan started the war, not the US. Japan also had a nuke program, just like the Nazis, and I guarantee if Japan or Germany got them first things today would be a lot different. We deployed nukes in order to force an end to the war instead of an invasion of the Japanese main islands that would have resulted in many more deaths than the nukes did.
Originally posted by waveydavey
the ONLY nation to EVER use Nuclear weapons in ANGER
Why not? As you pointed out we have used nukes so what could be better than the US trying to limit them in the world by citing example?
Originally posted by waveydavey
has the gall to dictate to anybody who should or should not have these weapons. Please, I'm not anti American I'm anti US Government.
Originally posted by waveydavey
idiots.