Tea Party is the American Taliban -The Newsroom

Originally posted by acmpnsfal
Penndot is now offering free voter ids to people who do not have a drivers license or state id. All you need to bring is proof of address like a bill or something. The plot to keep minorities from voting has been foiled.

 

Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

 

No one is trying to keep minorities from voting, just the Illegals who should not be voting anyway, but ACORN has made it easier for them to vote.
Go to Mexico and try to vote in their elections and see what happens

To be fair to the Tea Party, out of all the current political movements like Occupy and the Ron Paul revolution. The Tea Party, love them or hate them, have been the most successful at gaining political influence and making a change in American politics.

Reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

Ummmm Pennsylvania does not have a large population of illegals...lol. So putting a law like that in place for that reason makes no sense.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by RealSpoke

 

I can see how personal responsibility, smaller government, less government can terrify so many.

Growin up and maintaining the rights to self-determine can be scary.

Off topic.
So what do you have to say about -
-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in scriptural literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of progress
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological hatred of the U.S. government

And please try to keep your tribal mentality in check.
Or is this just you being unmoved by facts?
Thank you.

Originally posted by Summerian

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by RealSpoke

 

I can see how personal responsibility, smaller government, less government can terrify so many.

Growin up and maintaining the rights to self-determine can be scary.

Off topic.
So what do you have to say about -
-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in scriptural literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of progress
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological hatred of the U.S. government

And please try to keep your tribal mentality in check.
Or is this just you being unmoved by facts?
Thank you.

If you can't tolerate the truth you WILL and MUST always:

vigilantcitizen.com...

reply to post by Summerian


I see you have decided to use the Left's description. Nice try.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by acmpnsfal
Penndot is now offering free voter ids to people who do not have a drivers license or state id. All you need to bring is proof of address like a bill or something. The plot to keep minorities from voting has been foiled.

 

Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

 

No one is trying to keep minorities from voting, just the Illegals who should not be voting anyway, but ACORN has made it easier for them to vote.
Go to Mexico and try to vote in their elections and see what happens

edit on 1-9-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

ACORN is the topic?
Illegal aliens is the topic?
Oh, you are trying to be deflective, aren't you? Nothing you wrote above is true. You do not know of one single case of an illegal alien committing voter fraud.
So you try to defend the TEA party by making up things about someone else.
Does that seem intelligent to you?

Originally posted by Summerian

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by RealSpoke

 

I can see how personal responsibility, smaller government, less government can terrify so many.

Growin up and maintaining the rights to self-determine can be scary.

Off topic.
So what do you have to say about -
-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in scriptural literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of progress
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological hatred of the U.S. government

And please try to keep your tribal mentality in check.
Or is this just you being unmoved by facts?
Thank you.

I'll discuss personal responsibility.
Less taxes.
Smaller government.

NOT leftist talking points.

You're welcome.

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by Summerian
Off topic.
So what do you have to say about -
-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in scriptural literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of progress
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological hatred of the U.S. government

And please try to keep your tribal mentality in check.
Or is this just you being unmoved by facts?
Thank you.

I'll discuss personal responsibility.
Less taxes.
Smaller government.

NOT leftist talking points.

You're welcome.

Oh, only righties talking points then.
What ever keeps you safe...

---
American Taliban - spot on!
Internet has trolls. Reality has The Tea Party.

reply to post by Summerian


Since I'm a member of the Tea Party, I feel it only appropriate to define myself. Now you can call me whatever you wish, but saying it doesn't make it true.

MSNBC has tried. They failed also.

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Summerian

 

Since I'm a member of the Tea Party, I feel it only appropriate to define myself. Now you can call me whatever you wish, but saying it doesn't make it true.

MSNBC has tried. They failed also.

I haven't called you anything. So I agree with you a 100% - Now you can call me whatever you wish, but saying it doesn't make it true.

But please explain why you post in a thread you will have nothing to do with?

reply to post by Summerian


Because a group I belong to is being falsly associated with a terror group.

I felt I had to chime in. Did I need special permision?

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Summerian

 

Because a group I belong to is being falsly associated with a terror group.

I felt I had to chime in. Did I need special permision?

Not falsly - apt.
Not associated - compared to.

-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in scriptural literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of progress
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological hatred of the U.S. government

Apt, apt, apt...


(If the trolling don't stop maybe in the not so distant future we'll all need special permision.)

reply to post by Summerian


The leftists can be more aptly described by;

-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in secular literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of freedom
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological reliance of the U.S. government

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Summerian

 

The leftists can be more aptly described by;

-ideological purity
-compromise as weakness
-a fundamentalist belief in secular literalism
-denying science
-unmoved by facts
-undeterred by new information
-a hostile fear of freedom
-a demonization of education
-a need to control women's bodies
-severe xenophobia
-tribal mentality
-intolerance of dissent
-a pathological reliance of the U.S. government

Now that's just absurd.
Explain yourself please.

reply to post by Summerian


No. I will visit other forums. I refuse to get stuck debating irrelavent issues that don't define me. Perhaps I was in error to point the finger back at yourself.

Mea Culpa.

Good day.

reply to post by Endorra


I was not attempting deflection, I was merely clearing up a bit of disinformation, that being that people are trying to keep minorities from voting. This is nothing but a rant that Democrats have been using to paint Republicans as evil racists.

Originally posted by acmpnsfal
Reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

Ummmm Pennsylvania does not have a large population of illegals...lol. So putting a law like that in place for that reason makes no sense.

 

Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

 

I guess there are people who disagree with you. Perhaps it's just not as large a population as Az or Fla.

www.fairus.org...

Closed for staff review.