posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 07:20 PM
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
Originally posted by libertytoall
I don't think MrInquisitive is coming back. He must realize he's lost the argument.
Mr. Inquisitive is coming back, but he has better things to do than spend every day refuting the crap you warmongers, zionists and dissemblers of
misinformation on the health effects of depleted uranium have to say.
You have better things to do? You brought it up in case you have sudden Alzheimer's so I corrected you with factual information and then you fail to
respond with any worthy rebuttle but instead say your not going to bother spending the time? Yeah you lost that argument.. Next..
This is particularly the case with you, who quotes your own post about how it is beneficial to supply weapons to countries to oppress their own
rebellious people, in a response to my post about the irony of your name, "libertytoall", your point being that you claim you never said anything
about supporting oppressive governments.
Quote me please or are you making up more bs? I never said I support sending weapons to oppressive governments but I did say I understand in certain
situation why a government becomes oppressive. Take Syria for example. As mildly oppressive as Assad might be he's certainly a better alternative to
Muslim Brotherhood being in power. They would be hundreds of times more oppressive and thousands of times more violent. So wouldn't a slightly
oppressive Assad be a better alternative?
When you have a population of people hell bent on killing because of a sick religious ideology I would say that warrants being slightly oppressive
over giving free reign to kill thousands of people. Do you disagree?
By definition, a government that oppresses its people is an oppressive government.
Yes but what if the general population is much more oppressive and violent than the current government?? You don't seem to get that yet.. Assad has
kept the fanaticals who would love to skin you alive and smash your children into walls with pipe bombs simply for not being Muslim under control for
decades. Do you truly think the world will be better if one of those fanaticals actually controls the government and a military??
Do you feel population control in prisons is oppressive behavior? Some mildly oppressive government are necessary when the population is a bunch of
thugs and criminals. Most of the Muslim world might as well be a prison in need of correction officers and using Syria as the example, Assad has
been that prison guard for a long time successfully.
That you can't see this shows your lack of intelligence and/or cognitive dissonance, and it goes a long way to explaining why I am not going to bother
responding to every one of your posts.
You're going to insult me saying I have lack of intelligence when the only argument you provide in return is personal attacks and "I don't have time
for you" type attitude. Like I said before you have obviously lost this argument out of shear ignorance and ego.
It's like responding to a kid who's only response to everything you say is, "I know you are, but what am I?" There's no point to it.
I think that's how you responded when you made comments like "I'm not going to waste my time," or "shows your lack of intelligence," while providing
NOTHING of material in your response.. I have provided pages of quotes and factual sources to back up what I've stated.. As far as being a child..
Do you own a mirror? Try using it.
edit on 12-9-2012 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)