It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xuenchen
I think the Marxists would love to see 100% assistance.
"Liberalism is not socialism and never will be", Winston Churchill, 1908 as the Liberal Party candidate for Dundee.
"Anarchism is stateless socialism", Mikhail Bakunin
Jump to: navigation, search
In the anarchist, Marxist and socialist sense, free association (also called free association of producers or, as Marx often called it, community of freely associated individuals) is a kind of relation between individuals where there is no state, social class or authority, in a society that has abolished the private property of means of production. Once private property is abolished, individuals are no longer deprived of access to means of production so they can freely associate themselves (without social constraint) to produce and reproduce their own conditions of existence and fulfill their needs and desires.
By large building you must be talking about the holes in walls that most welfare offices are.... Some without bathrooms ( I know I've worked in them.. Construction) and the three or four office people talking to assistees.
Once again that helps the working tax payer how?
What's happening now is the people who take advantage of the system are in control.
The real problem is the staggering amount of people already using this system for a cheap meal ticket, the drug addicts, the gangsters, and the ones who don't want to work.
and the rest are leaches on society that should just die and rid us of their pestilence.
It's not necessarily about the programs.
It's about the waste and corruption.
Too many thieves involved.
Take the corruption out of the picture and some of it might actually work without bankrupting the country.