It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Pagami Creek Fire covered 93,000 acres in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wildness. Now, scientists are finding a goldmine of clues to the region's past unearthed by the fire.
“It’s interesting because you see that landscape similar to what it was like after the glaciers receded; really open landscape and you can imagine what it looked like as tundra,” said archaeologist Lee Johnson.
disturbing an archeological site can be a federal offense
zack vavricka
Originally posted by Elton
I am no geologist, but it seems odd that in 10,000 years no dirt or soil has covered them up (from the article they were in a dense growth area so there should not be too much wind erosion).
Hopefully they will follow up and we will hear more of this find.
Originally posted by Elton
I am no geologist, but it seems odd that in 10,000 years no dirt or soil has covered them up (from the article they were in a dense growth area so there should not be too much wind erosion).
In the US, archaeological resources are protected on Federal lands and disturbing them is an offence. In Ontario, the law applies across the board, and a provincial licence is required to do any field work.
Originally posted by St Udio
... so why the threat of Federal prosecution?
Originally posted by votan
where do people get the dates from?? what is it based on?? how did the determine 9000 yrs old.
Ever notice how there are only two things that look like lithic debris on a freshly-ploughed and rained-upon field...and one of them is bird crap?
Originally posted by Byrd
To follow up on what Johnny said -- the fires would have burned off the vegetation, leaving the area subject to erosion as well. If you've ever been on a dig (paleontological or archaeological) you know that we always find more material after a good rain.
Originally posted by Elton
I am no geologist, but it seems odd that in 10,000 years no dirt or soil has covered them up (from the article they were in a dense growth area so there should not be too much wind erosion).
Hopefully they will follow up and we will hear more of this find.
Originally posted by votan
where do people get the dates from?? what is it based on?? how did the determine 9000 yrs old.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Ever notice how there are only two things that look like lithic debris on a freshly-ploughed and rained-upon field...and one of them is bird crap?
Originally posted by Byrd
To follow up on what Johnny said -- the fires would have burned off the vegetation, leaving the area subject to erosion as well. If you've ever been on a dig (paleontological or archaeological) you know that we always find more material after a good rain.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Originally posted by votan
where do people get the dates from?? what is it based on?? how did the determine 9000 yrs old.
The dates are usually inscribed on the backside of the artifact, along with the phrase "Hecho en Mexico".
Originally posted by Byrd
This is why we don't lick lithics.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Ever notice how there are only two things that look like lithic debris on a freshly-ploughed and rained-upon field...and one of them is bird crap?