It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrSpad
Ron Pauls support is confined to small group. If he were to run third party it would have little effect on the general election.
reply to post by MrSpad
Ron Pauls support is confined to small group.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Ron Paul won't run third party. It's too late. There is A LOT to do ... exploratory committees and signatures and getting on ballots. if he hasn't got all that in place by now and if he isn't running ads ... he isn't running.
Originally posted by RELDDIR
reply to post by Alxandro
Or course Obama. Ron Paul has stayed in every single GOP primary to the end, to make sure the "true conservative" doesn't win. RP, also with foreign donations was able to end his campaigns with surpluses, while the others ended theirs with deficits. Ron Paul reminds me of Ross Perot '92. Like Obama said early on in the campaign season, 2012 elections will be much like 1992.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by Alxandro
I'm a Ron Paul supporter and neither I, nor any other Dr Paul fan that I know, would EVER cast a vote for Obama...
I'm sorry, nothing against you, but I find this a bit difficult to believe
Folks, is this true?
Originally posted by Alxandro
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by Alxandro
I'm a Ron Paul supporter and neither I, nor any other Dr Paul fan that I know, would EVER cast a vote for Obama...
I'm sorry, nothing against you, but I find this a bit difficult to believe
Folks, is this true?
Originally posted by Cuervo
Originally posted by Alxandro
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by Alxandro
I'm a Ron Paul supporter and neither I, nor any other Dr Paul fan that I know, would EVER cast a vote for Obama...
I'm sorry, nothing against you, but I find this a bit difficult to believe
Folks, is this true?
Very untrue. He may be saying that because most of the people he knows are republicans. Several people I know (myself included) are Obama supporters who would have voted for Ron Paul had he gained the nomination.
He is much more liberal than Obama where it counts and much more conservative than Romney where it counts. No matter which side of the fence you sit on, he will represent you better than your guy will.
Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
reply to post by MrSpad
Not really. Ron Pual supporters are a large number. The reason it never showed in the polls is because they are all young voters, and aren't in the habit of voting in the primaries. Primaries are predominantly voted on by the extremely elderly. I should know. I work the polls every year. I know who was there. And the elder end isn't on the web, isn't getting news outside of a newspaper or the main news sources. Heck, some of the elder Republicans don't even watch FOX, lol.
The reason RP got the Caucus response is because these people went to the Caucuses, when they wouldn't go to the Primaries. Seriously.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by Alxandro
I'm a Ron Paul supporter and neither I, nor any other Dr Paul fan that I know, would EVER cast a vote for Obama...
I'm sorry, nothing against you, but I find this a bit difficult to believe
Folks, is this true?
Originally posted by MrSpad
Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
reply to post by MrSpad
Not really. Ron Pual supporters are a large number. The reason it never showed in the polls is because they are all young voters, and aren't in the habit of voting in the primaries. Primaries are predominantly voted on by the extremely elderly. I should know. I work the polls every year. I know who was there. And the elder end isn't on the web, isn't getting news outside of a newspaper or the main news sources. Heck, some of the elder Republicans don't even watch FOX, lol.
The reason RP got the Caucus response is because these people went to the Caucuses, when they wouldn't go to the Primaries. Seriously.
So lets say he has a large group of hidden supporters that do not take polls or vote and are some how hidden from from everyone. If they do not vote then they might as well not exist. Pauls supporters are Pauls supporters. They vote Paul even if he is not running. So if Paul runs or does not run as a third party it is a non factor as the people who would vote for him if he ran are not voting for anyone else if he does not. In the end it would not help or hurt either party if he ran again. Last time he ran as a 3rd party he got .05% of the vote. I do not understand this demand that Paul has lots of popular support when clearly he does not. Do Pauls supporter need some kind of vindication for their beliefs? So what if most people do not support him. If you do then more power to you. Is that not enough?
Agreed.
So lets say he has a large group of hidden supporters that do not take polls or vote and are some how hidden from from everyone. If they do not vote then they might as well not exist.
Not quite. Some of them that voted for his supporters in the Caucuses are going to vote the lesser of 2 evils in Mitt Romney. Or Obama, depending on which end of the spectrum they are. I am one that's tired of voting the lesser of two evils. Some RP folks haven't reached that point.
Pauls supporters are Pauls supporters. They vote Paul even if he is not running. So if Paul runs or does not run as a third party it is a non factor as the people who would vote for him if he ran are not voting for anyone else if he does not.
It's never enough to lose, but who others support is honestly their business, in the end. I can only object so long before they have to walk in and vote the polls. I'm sure, some RP supporter needs some vindication, but to me, that's just plain asinine.
Do Pauls supporter need some kind of vindication for their beliefs? So what if most people do not support him. If you do then more power to you. Is that not enough?