It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Serdgiam
reply to post by MrXYZ
Are you a part of that process yourself?
If so, do tell us of your contributions to the scientific community! I think itd be pretty cool.
If not, well, you really dont see the point of the correlation being made?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by MrXYZ
That didn't describe the orbit of the moon.
It doesn't describe anything really...not even the earth is a circle, so they didn't even get that right
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Funny how you can't seem to name that "something". You can't seriously still claim "intent" is what I'm missing because that would be complete and utter nonsense
Of course, it would HAVE to be, wouldn't it?
Oh and that "something" would involve the real star of Bethlehem (info provided), and a red moon rising at 3:00pm on April 3rd, 33AD (info also provided).
edit on 28-8-2012 by NewAgeMan because: edit
Get a planetarium software (I recommend Celestia if you're on a Mac) and you'll notice that this isn't a rare event. And astronomical happenings don't automatically make the other claims in the bible valid...ESPECIALLY if there are HUNDREDS of things demonstrably wrong in the bible, a fact you seem to wilfully ignore
Yes, but what doesn't happen often, or again, is the sun rising in front of Virgo with a crescent moon underneath, and at night, a triple retrograde conjunction of Jupiter over Regulus, as seen near Judea, preceeded by a perfect conjunction of Jupiter and Venus nine months prior, followed 33 years later to the day of the cross, a date verified also by prophecy (Daniel) coinciding with a full lunar eclipse as it rose on the horizon occuring at mid afternoon, and then a red harvest moon in the evening. Also worth considering, ah never mind, this is really just throwing pearls before swine to be trampled under foot by ignorant and hard-hearted people with an agenda not an open-mind.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by MrXYZ
That didn't describe the orbit of the moon.
It doesn't describe anything really...not even the earth is a circle, so they didn't even get that right
What are you laughing at? It's called squaring the circle, just one of many HIGHLY unusual properties of the Earth, Moon, Sun relationship.
Originally posted by centrifugal
Exactly the point I have been trying to make. All information anyone here has learned regarding evolution was from a source they believe to be credible. Every belief you hold(true or not) whether atheist or christian is based on intuition and not logic, since we only know logic exists through intuition. Have fun proving the existence of logic with logic... similarly try proving existence of god because you believe in god.
Welcome to religion evolutionists... Enjoy! (This is a taunt)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
WRONG.
Why?
Because of scientific method and peer reviews ensuring that mistakes are caught...mistakes that religions aren't willing to catch at all.
Originally posted by centrifugal
Originally posted by MrXYZ
WRONG.
Why?
Because of scientific method and peer reviews ensuring that mistakes are caught...mistakes that religions aren't willing to catch at all.
First... mistakes are subjective, you will define a mistake based on your belief of the world.
Second... which mistakes are you referring, please provide examples.
Third... Science and Religion are not mutually exclusive. There are many sciences and many religions, and cannot not be compared at a general level. Your statement about religions not catching mistakes it just biased. I also generally agree with most scientific theories and yet I still believe in intelligent design.
I will still admit I can't provide definitive proof for either side of the argument, but neither can you.
Originally posted by Serdgiam
reply to post by MrXYZ
I am saying that if you dont do that, you are trusting others to do your exploration and explanation for you and have no ground to stand on when criticizing someone else for having "blind faith."
Ill take it from your response you are not even involved in the scientific community?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
According to you, NOTHING can ever be known. When you get in your car you can't ever know if it'll work because after all, can you build an engine?
Look up what peer reviews are
Originally posted by Serdgiam
Originally posted by MrXYZ
According to you, NOTHING can ever be known. When you get in your car you can't ever know if it'll work because after all, can you build an engine?
Interesting interpretation of the data at hand. I never said that though. Funny how these things work, isnt it?
Look up what peer reviews are
I am aware of what they are. I find it interesting that you, who has no interaction with the scientific community or peer review, would attempt to educate someone else on the matter. Do you get your information on these things from third party sources as well?
Originally posted by centrifugal
reply to post by Serdgiam
It probably is a futile effort even discussing it. The lessons in these replies will be totally forgotten in the next biased evolution vs creationism thread. Everyone is so quick to take a side, and even though I favor intelligent design I am at least open to discussing the arguments. You can't argue with people who have already decided. It's fun to pull their arguments apart though.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by MrXYZ
One thing that does become clear is that Daniel and his descendants along with Magi from the East were very well acquainted with astonomy, and in reading the gospels that Jesus recognized something rather elemental about his birth origin and fated calling, which has now been shown to have culminated with a lunar eclipse, the only one visible from the region of Judea during the reign of Pontias Pilate, the implication of which Jesus saw himself as the fullfillment of prophecy and intentionally played the role to the hilt, AND, and here's the kicker, carried out his three year ministry, from baptism at the Jordan River to the cross, with that celetial event already in MIND, but it get's better, when we consider the framing of his conception and birth, and then start stepping back and looking at the frame from father and father away regarding causes and effects or vice versa.
The Bible can be wrong about lots of things it doesn't matter is the thread of prophecy that runs thorugh it, holds up, and this one holds up under scrutiny, BOTH from the prophecy framework eminating from Daniel, AND to the present day with the help of a little historical sleuthing and astonomical software.