It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by MrXYZ
Evolution is PART of the puzzle, but it's not the whole thing, and it's insufficient to explain a facet of the creation demonstrating an original intent. You missed what I'd presented and it was lost in your assumptions, the first of which is that you are right and I am and must be, wrong.
Of course evolution is only part of the puzzle...it makes no statement regarding how life started in the first place. Doesn't change the FACT that the theory is a FACT...and that your entire argument is based on an argumentative fallacy
Also, how about you prove "intent" is even part of the equation? As I mentioned already, your "earth, moon, ..." stuff is complete and utter nonsense and an argumentative fallacy..
Read up on physics and stop trying to copy O'Reilly:
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by nixie_nox
You missed the point as well..
Have a nice day everyone, and don't even bother with this thread it's a waste of time.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by MrXYZ
Evolution is PART of the puzzle, but it's not the whole thing, and it's insufficient to explain a facet of the creation demonstrating an original intent. You missed what I'd presented and it was lost in your assumptions, the first of which is that you are right and I am and must be, wrong.
Of course evolution is only part of the puzzle...it makes no statement regarding how life started in the first place. Doesn't change the FACT that the theory is a FACT...and that your entire argument is based on an argumentative fallacy
Also, how about you prove "intent" is even part of the equation? As I mentioned already, your "earth, moon, ..." stuff is complete and utter nonsense and an argumentative fallacy..
Read up on physics and stop trying to copy O'Reilly:
There was more to it than just the strange Earth, Moon, Sun relationship, something very signigicant that you missed and glossed over entirely.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by nixie_nox
Have a nice day everyone, and don't even bother with this thread it's a waste of time.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Funny how you can't seem to name that "something". You can't seriously still claim "intent" is what I'm missing because that would be complete and utter nonsense
Originally posted by GafferUK1981
reply to post by NewAgeMan
But as I've just taught you the earth is not a sphere so your numbers are incorrect.
It does seem to be a tactic of those who still can't get with the times and let religion go that they try confuse atheists and if they confuse an atheist then there must be a god. Very very wrong
You could always try the chicken and the egg argument
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Funny how you can't seem to name that "something". You can't seriously still claim "intent" is what I'm missing because that would be complete and utter nonsense
Of course, it would HAVE to be, wouldn't it?
Oh and that "something" would involve the real star of Bethlehem (info provided), and a red moon rising at 3:00pm on April 3rd, 33AD (info also provided).
edit on 28-8-2012 by NewAgeMan because: edit
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Serdgiam
you don't try to get people to do the work for you.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by GafferUK1981
reply to post by NewAgeMan
But as I've just taught you the earth is not a sphere so your numbers are incorrect.
It does seem to be a tactic of those who still can't get with the times and let religion go that they try confuse atheists and if they confuse an atheist then there must be a god. Very very wrong
You could always try the chicken and the egg argument
Originally posted by Serdgiam
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Serdgiam
you don't try to get people to do the work for you.
Interesting you should bring that up.. What specific experiments have you done to verify what you accept as true? What work in genetics have you done to verify evolution? What archaeology have you performed to these ends?
And to just try to make this point clear; Have you done testing of the collisions of particles at near light speed, or rely on structures such as the LHC to do the work for you?
I am not attacking or making fun of you because of it though. We all do this is some form or another, and I feel its just part of being human. As far as justifying making fun of people.. I still dont see the need to openly make fun of someone. That doesnt just refer to you, but the endless ways this happens throughout this board and even the world.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by MrXYZ
That didn't describe the orbit of the moon.
Originally posted by centrifugal
Originally posted by Serdgiam
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Serdgiam
you don't try to get people to do the work for you.
Interesting you should bring that up.. What specific experiments have you done to verify what you accept as true? What work in genetics have you done to verify evolution? What archaeology have you performed to these ends?
And to just try to make this point clear; Have you done testing of the collisions of particles at near light speed, or rely on structures such as the LHC to do the work for you?
I am not attacking or making fun of you because of it though. We all do this is some form or another, and I feel its just part of being human. As far as justifying making fun of people.. I still dont see the need to openly make fun of someone. That doesnt just refer to you, but the endless ways this happens throughout this board and even the world.
Exactly the point I have been trying to make. All information anyone here has learned regarding evolution was from a source they believe to be credible. Every belief you hold(true or not) whether atheist or christian is based on intuition and not logic, since we only know logic exists through intuition. Have fun proving the existence of logic with logic... similarly try proving existence of god because you believe in god.
Welcome to religion evolutionists... Enjoy! (This is a taunt)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Funny how you can't seem to name that "something". You can't seriously still claim "intent" is what I'm missing because that would be complete and utter nonsense
Of course, it would HAVE to be, wouldn't it?
Oh and that "something" would involve the real star of Bethlehem (info provided), and a red moon rising at 3:00pm on April 3rd, 33AD (info also provided).
edit on 28-8-2012 by NewAgeMan because: edit
Get a planetarium software (I recommend Celestia if you're on a Mac) and you'll notice that this isn't a rare event. And astronomical happenings don't automatically make the other claims in the bible valid...ESPECIALLY if there are HUNDREDS of things demonstrably wrong in the bible, a fact you seem to wilfully ignore