It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by hawkiye
A lot of countries require you to dip your finger in indelible ink after voting. That way you know who voted and would be hard to actually vote again unless you had a insider to allow you to do so again.
Maybe that is the way the US should go. Though I would prefer Voter ID.
By the way, I only vote in the local elections at State level since the POTUS is elected via the electoral college rather than popular vote.
If the popular vote for POTUS was incorperated, then Gore would have been POTUS as would have been Hillary.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by hawkiye
The more who vote, the less impact it has is all I'm saying.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by hawkiye
What I do know is that come voting day most of those working in the polling places are our neighbors. They are not appointees or hired in most cases. If it were as some think it is, they would be screaming from the rooftops.
It may appear at times that corruption is everywhere, but it's not; not really.
Yes it exists, but as we see it uncovered and it does get exposed often, it's clear it's on a small scale. The more who vote, the less impact it has is all I'm saying.
What I do know is that come voting day most of those working in the polling places are our neighbors. They are not appointees or hired in most cases. If it were as some think it is, they would be screaming from the rooftops.