It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Well you are jumping all over the place. Noone gives a damn what your gut feeling is. Provide some evidence other than wild accusations that stem from nothing more than your imagination. Just try at least. Remember the motto of the site.
General Conspiracies: This forum is dedicated to general conspiracy theories, cover-ups, and government scandals that may not fit into other topical forums on ATS. Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups.Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com's tradition of focusing on conspiracy theory, cover-ups, and scandals.
NASA executives probably were throwing 'high fives' all over the place upon hearing of his demise. As in "Whew."
Originally posted by PsykoOps reply to post by de_GenovaYeah unlike the OP which was somewhat original my reply was directly to that one specific post. If you get tingly feeling from a video that does not a conspiracy theory make. Especially when you claim facts based on nothing but your gut feeling. You provide no evidence to support these claims.
We've gone through these several times on the board already. You should try the search function. It's really handy.
Originally posted by sprtpilot
It is obvious to anyone with an IQ over, say, 90 that the technology used in 1969 could not have done what they presented.
NASA admits to have used staged photographs and releasing them at the time as authentic.
NASA today is researching solutions to problems like lethal to humans radiation that they must solve to return to the Moon or go to Mars.
Only one element of the many has to be found to be scientifically bogus to discredit the lunar landing claims:
the lunar lander single rocket engine could not have worked;
the radiation danger was not solved, there was essentially zero protection while on the lunar surface;
the film photography could not have survived the radiation, studio perfect photographs are presented as those made by astronauts with no way to focus, set, or frame;
there was no way to heat or cool the lunar lander while on the surface;
the risk of leaving bodies on the moon was too great, they knew the tech was insufficient for the deadline of 1969;
it was a "matter of national security", any means necessary justified the end.
think about it critically
Originally posted by babybunnies ......And yet recent photos of the moon landing site taken in the last month or so show the whole area exactly as Armstrong said took place, even down to the flag that was knocked over by the rockets of the LEM when it took off.
Originally posted by mikellmikell
IQ 137 here you gotta do better than that.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
At the risk of violating ATS terms of service, I have to say that these moon hoaxer conspiracy theorists are among the most horribly uninformed and unrepentently ignorant people I've ever encountered. On the other hand, the Apollo moon landing was probably THE most well documented event you can think of.