It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HamrHeed
We know that the founders were NOT referring to hunting rifles. The were referring to arms equal to those possessed by the government.
The were referring to arms equal to those possessed by the government.
Originally posted by WP4YT
they can always amend the constitution
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Originally posted by HamrHeed
We know that the founders were NOT referring to hunting rifles. The were referring to arms equal to those possessed by the government.
Please state where it defines the type of gun you are allowed to own...please state where it says not hunting rifles..
Also please state where it says you can own multiple weapons?
The were referring to arms equal to those possessed by the government.
I need to see where it states this..edit on 26-8-2012 by kerazeesicko because: I can
Originally posted by Doc Gator
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Originally posted by HamrHeed
We know that the founders were NOT referring to hunting rifles. The were referring to arms equal to those possessed by the government.
Please state where it defines the type of gun you are allowed to own...please state where it says not hunting rifles..
Also please state where it says you can own multiple weapons?
The were referring to arms equal to those possessed by the government.
I need to see where it states this..edit on 26-8-2012 by kerazeesicko because: I can
Once again, if there is no law making it illegal, it is legal.
The 2nd Amendment places no restrictions on firearm ownership. There have been restrictions on the ownership of certain firearms, see National Firearms Act (NFA), but that is a tax and registration, not a ban. The individual states have the option of passing laws that restrict firearm ownership/purchasing as long as it does not violate the 2nd Amendment. Most states don't pass these laws and most states have some version of the 2nd Amendment in their Constitutions.
If you want to understand the founders intent, I would suggest reading The Federalist Papers. It spells it out in their own words.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by kerazeesicko
Since the 2nd Amendment does not state what type or number of firearms a individual may aquire, then the obvious answer is as many as I want.
The Constitution also gave the States rights to govern themselves as well at a local level. That is where law really matters. At the local level.
And that makes it even simpler. If a State decides that weapons are illegal, I'll move to another State.
If the Feds outlawed weapons, the US would be a third world nation in no time.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by HamrHeed
Bonnie and Clyde had Automatics, and that was more than fifty years ago.
I have no problem with the restrictions placed on automatic/machine guns though. I can't afford the ammo.
And even if I could I still wouldn't get one as it has always been my belief that if you have to "Pray and Spray" to hit something, then you have no business behind the trigger.
The military on the other hand does have a need for such weapons, but I think that at the Soldier level, all weapons should be Semi-Auto only...teach to hit what they aim at, rather than burning through their basic load in minutes.
The military on the other hand does have a need for such weapons, but I think that at the Soldier level, all weapons should be Semi-Auto only...teach to hit what they aim at, rather than burning through their basic load in minutes.
God, give us grace to accept with serenity the things that cannot be changed, Courage to change the things which should be changed, and the Wisdom to distinguish the one from the other.