Originally posted by Carrierwave
Here's the problem with people like you. In your mind everyone "else" is a liar except you because *you* were "in the military". I am a co-website author with H. Green Jr. Many of the photos on his site I took and he and I have been researching the tacmar codes for over 8 years. We have briefed many dozen of military in service -out of service. Most of them have tolds us that the signcode markers are military and FEMA. Since you are in denial and probably never checked out the evidence yourself, which is out there on the roadways for everyone to see, your comments are baseless. We have known people like you to outright lie who are in the military. Of course this information is supposed to classified and lying is the only way to keep it "classified". Let's get honest. We have more knowledge about this information in our little toes than you have in your whole body, unless you are lying too.
Come back with more information than "you are a liar" and I will listen to you.
By the way the, article in the Washington Post is entitled-- "SUBTLE SIGNS WILL SHOW THE WAY" Do you need more help with that?
Originally posted by Carrierwave... I am a co-website author with H. Green Jr. ...Carrierwave~
Originally posted by Carrierwave... Many of the photos on his site I took and he and I have been researching the tacmar codes for over 8 years.
Originally posted by NightStalker
You keep on 'dancing' around the issues and facts being presented.
How about answering a few questions for us, that is after I make a few observations from your previous posts.
Observations, Comments and Questions:
1) You stated that you are the co-author of the website that you keep using as a reference.
Question: How can we beleive you when you are directly involved with the 'source' of your 'facts'?
2) You took the photos yourself?
Observation: Take a photography class! Those are some badly out of focus photos.
Question: Why no closeups? Gee, maybe it would show that they are just what we have been telling you, inventory tags.
3) You have briefed military personnel on this and were told by them that it was, in fact, signcode for the military and FEMA.
Question: What Rank(s) were these people? What branches were they from? And (if this was true) why would they tell you about it?
4) You accuse anyone with facts of being a liar and possibly part of the conspiracy.
Question: Is this because you have no other defense? Or do you choose to ignore the facts?
5.) You say that the way this is done is that the vehicle shines a infrared light from the back of the vehicle at the sign, the driver who is wearing a set of nightvisions and looking out the rear view mirrors is able to drive and navigate at 50mph?
Question: Do you really think that this is possible??
Observation: Hey boys and girls do not try this at home. I train and have instructed drivers training using nightvision. This is not safe, it is not the way the military trains, and anybody that thinks you can drive using nightvisions using the rear view mirrors to navigate gets a big .
I posted this before: Imagine yourself driving in the dark and trying to read something on the back of a sign. NO WAY. You would end up crashing.
Oh, just so you know:
a. I have 30 years Military time
b. I have Law Enforcement time
c. I have a high enough Clearance and need to know about something like this
d. 'special forces Marines' are called Force Recon
e. I am getting a real laugh over this thread, because its not true
f. I've checked this out (just in case some one forgot to tell me about it, wouldn't want to get lost on the way to the staging area) and buddies in Law Enforcement, FEMA and the Military all had a big over it.
There are so many other subjects out there to research, but this is not one of them.
Originally posted by Carrierwave
I suppose a better word would have been "ignorant" for you Mr. R-U. And if you desire to sue me, have at it. I have been threatened before with lawsuits and I have a good lawyer. I would hope it is not because you got your feelings hurt. I have been called much worse and never threatened ANYONE with court nor taken ANYONE court over it.
The word "ignorant" comes from the root to "ignore". \Ig"no*rant\, a. [F., fr. L. ignorans, -antis, p. pr. of ignorare to be ignorant. See Ignore.]
I get a little tired of having to repeat information I have already posted. In otherwords, you have, ignored facts I have posted and continue to bring them up, Especially about the night-vision thing. This is what a Special Forces Marine told me just recently. Go back and read my posts, please. I even questioned whether this could be done in another posting I made. Can't you read? Here you are bringing it up again. GO BACK AN D READ MY POSTINGS. I have been to the land navigational range at Camp Grayling and have seen the road signs and arrows and reflective markers they are using to train with night-vision. I have already posted this also. Can't you read?
I have worked security and had police training in anti-terrorism, bomb threat assessment, medical response, and investigations. Though I was never in military I rub shoulders with them on a weekly basis, and my father was a decorated Pearl Harbor veteran. I work with law enforcement laison officers at an educational institution daily, and National Guard recruiters are my close associates every other week. I have briefed Captains, Sergeants, Special Forces officers, and National Guard of various ranks, sheriffs, deputies, State Police Officers, and the FEMA officer in our county. I have lots of resources to draw from. I have studied the roadway signcodes for 8 years and held seminars with H. Green before the Michigan Militia Wolverines, nothern division, and several town hall discussion forums on the subject.
Some of the picky points-- Fuzzy photos- These are not to deceive-- I could not afford a digital camera for several years and used a 110 Kodak for many of the photos and used a cheap flat-bed scanner to proccess them. Best I could do then, but the older photos are some of the best because they show the transition of markers over the years.
"No Close-ups of the markers"--- There is a close up shot of a marker on Harold's website showing an "un-punched' date marker on the back of a stop sign. There are no inventory numbers on it. Just dates, but they "forgot" to punch out the date of installation, as far as warranty goes makes the marker worthless. Yet the "highly reflective" quality makes it a good visual.
[edit on 25-9-2004 by Carrierwave]
Originally posted by SkiFreak
if you need additional photos as proof by someone not associated with the people that have documented this phenomenon.
Originally posted by Carrierwave
If the UN/NATO ever decides to police America during an extreme emergency, better lock and load brother. Operation Garden Plot coupled with the unCostitutional "emergency executive orders" will totally dismantle our nation and put us under international control. Good bye freedom and justice for all. These troops will be using these marked routes and confiscating the marked facilities and resources for their use to do it.