posted on Jun, 6 2003 @ 02:14 AM
Hasn't this just turned into a bundle of joy! First, to be on topic, there is no proof that many of the "asteroid craters" were made by
asteroids....that's just what they are called because that is the only accepted explanation for it.
now about creationism vs. evolution.....here's the thing. Firstly, it is more probably that there is an intelligent being or groups of intelligent
being that exist on a plane not comprehendable in the terms of our existence that could have been the source of life than it is that darwin's theory
is true, for the reasons I stated in my earlier post. As for similarities, there are a lot of things that look alike and arent very related at all.
Cats that look like dogs, and dogs like cats, etc...and if I remember correctly, over 90% of our DNA IS THE SAME AS A SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM! This
does not support evolution, this supports the use of a blueprint, an INTELLGENT DESIGN, for life. If evolution were true, why are there no mass
divergents? after all, anything probably, however unlikely, will happen, isnt that right? So there should be some sort of organism that is totally
alien from all other life, just by the freak chance.
Someone here asked for proof....can anyone show me ANY proof for darwinism? I know they can't, there is none. Accepted theory is not proof, nope,
sorry bub, you've been brainwashed! I'm not saying I'm right....I'm saying that your belief is...you got it....a religion too! A religion of
anti-religion, of anti-soul, but a religion all the same. A religion tailor-made for those who want to believe that this is all there is,so they can
live without a conscience. Remember, a religion is based on faith, and faith is the belief in things that are not provable. Darwinism cannot be proven
true. That things can adapt can be proven.....but not that anything can make a fundamental change from one thing to something completely different.
Anyone who is willing to do unbiased, objective research will see that there is far too much design for darwin's theory. How could an orchid with a
12 inch hole down to its pollen have survived before the moth with the 12 in nose existed? And if the moth came first, then why would the orchid have
come into existence, and even if it had, how and why would the moth have survived in the meantime? Life, all of life, is contructed with immensely
complex designs that mere chance can explain. And have it known that Darwin actually USED that moth/orchid example as supposed proof for his
theory.....and people call that brilliant? Pretty blind, I would say.
That, though, is just a tiny piece. Things that we take for granted, like vision, hearing, etc, our entire nervous system, rely on so many
interconnected systems that supposed mutations can't begin to explain. If the fittest survived, then why is it they just happened to also have these
odd useless mutations that later became key for other mutations, not just once, but millions of times? Seems pretty organismed and well thought out,
doesnt it? I'm not saying there is a god...what I am saying is that there is more than blind chance. And we haven't even touched the metaphysical
aspects of life. And before you rush out to deny them, enlighten yourself, and you might just see your error. That we are more than just the skin that
holds us all together has been proven in many ways and forms, some quite scientific. Tell me how a non-physical body evolves from nothing, will you?
Thats something I REALLY want to hear.