posted on Aug, 25 2012 @ 02:52 AM
reply to post by sled735
I have to begin by saying that I think David Wilcock is snake oil salesman, my opinion. As to some of the things he said about the US Marshals, he is
correct. The US Marshals are the only Constitutionally mandated law enforcement agency. One of their primary jobs is protecting the Federal Judges and
the judges appreciate that, sort of in the same way that the Secret Service protects the president. They also have the power to deputize people, turn
you into a federal agent under their command. Me. Wilcock stated that the Marshals can take over the military, that is also true. It is good to be
friends with Federal judges for them. Finally, the military cannot command local law enforcement, the US Marshals can. A very little known fact is
that the US Marshals are responsible for protecting all of the Americans at the UN. Not just anyone gets to bring a gun into the United Nations.
Just to save you time, I am not nor have I ever been a US Marshal; but, I knew many. Something I forgot, I do know of US Marshals being sent overseas
to make an arrest. I don't know under what authority they did so, I just cannot remember. Now here is what I find interesting about Mr. Wilcock's
comments, only a US Marshal could require a military base to allow them on to arrest military officers. The military have their own courts; but, a US
Marshal could arrest a military person on the base without permission because of the Constitution. This parting note for any "militia" or
"sovereign citizens", do what the nice Marshal tells you or the judge will crucify you.