It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by MaMaa
What kid eats carrot sticks? Cmon, if it's going in the trash it's just a waste. Muchelle thinks she is going to retrain all the kids because the parents don't know what they are doing. This is what I do not like about her and her programs.edit on 25-8-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
Where did I say that I expect such an outlandish thing? I said it is my BELIEF that the government should not be involved in nutritional decisions for our children. A registered dietician could design a healthy menu, but there should be CHOICES such as breads other than just wheat. Some people really don't like wheat products, or are allergic to gluten. When I was a child the only drink was white milk...something I could NEVER stomach. Everyday was a struggle to NOT drink it as the teachers tried to force me. This was in the early 1960's. I do not have any tolerance for anyone who wants to dictate what I should be eating, drinking, saying and watching...as long as I am not inflicting pain on others. It's called CHOICE in this country of mine last time I checked, so why are these CHOICES waning more and more in every facet of our lives? Did "we, the people" ask the government to cater to us by expecting choices for school lunch as they always were? How is this catering to us? On our tax dollars? Hmm.
1)You didnt say it outright. You juts complain because they are not offering what YOU want, which is the same thing. If you dont want the government involved, DONT BUY SCHOOL LUNCH. It really IS that simple. They are forcing nothing, yet you complain anyway.
2)You talk about tax payer dollars, yet you want school districts to hire dieticians. Hypocrite?
3)If people dont like wheat product, they dont have to eat them. Again, NOTHING IS BEING FORCED.
4)Again, NO ONE IS DICTATING WHAT YOU EAT. They dictate what the school offers for lunch. Dont want it? Send your kid with a packed lunch. Why is this concept so hard to grasp?
5)It is called CHOICE. The choice is: pack your kid a lunch, or eat the OPTIONS that the school offers. Again, it really is that simple.
6)On your tax dollars? You do realize, as I have already pointed out, that school lunch programs are required to be self-sustaining, right? Meaning your tax dollars dont affect them, only the kids on free lunch.edit on 27-8-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by elrem48
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
Where did I say that I expect such an outlandish thing? I said it is my BELIEF that the government should not be involved in nutritional decisions for our children. A registered dietician could design a healthy menu, but there should be CHOICES such as breads other than just wheat. Some people really don't like wheat products, or are allergic to gluten. When I was a child the only drink was white milk...something I could NEVER stomach. Everyday was a struggle to NOT drink it as the teachers tried to force me. This was in the early 1960's. I do not have any tolerance for anyone who wants to dictate what I should be eating, drinking, saying and watching...as long as I am not inflicting pain on others. It's called CHOICE in this country of mine last time I checked, so why are these CHOICES waning more and more in every facet of our lives? Did "we, the people" ask the government to cater to us by expecting choices for school lunch as they always were? How is this catering to us? On our tax dollars? Hmm.
1)You didnt say it outright. You juts complain because they are not offering what YOU want, which is the same thing. If you dont want the government involved, DONT BUY SCHOOL LUNCH. It really IS that simple. They are forcing nothing, yet you complain anyway.
2)You talk about tax payer dollars, yet you want school districts to hire dieticians. Hypocrite?
3)If people dont like wheat product, they dont have to eat them. Again, NOTHING IS BEING FORCED.
4)Again, NO ONE IS DICTATING WHAT YOU EAT. They dictate what the school offers for lunch. Dont want it? Send your kid with a packed lunch. Why is this concept so hard to grasp?
5)It is called CHOICE. The choice is: pack your kid a lunch, or eat the OPTIONS that the school offers. Again, it really is that simple.
6)On your tax dollars? You do realize, as I have already pointed out, that school lunch programs are required to be self-sustaining, right? Meaning your tax dollars dont affect them, only the kids on free lunch.edit on 27-8-2012 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
Why is it beyond your ability to GRASP the only beef( no pun intended) that I have with this agenda is the mere fact that the GOVERNMENT is sticking its' nose in? Do they not have enough crucial issues that need their attention? You keep harping on me complaining about WHAT they don't "offer." You are missing my point...the government involves itself in anything that can give it more control of "us" ...and THAT is what I am against!
Where did I say That the "school should hire a dietician?" I said, "A registered dietician could design a healthy menu, but there should be CHOICES such as breads other than just wheat."
If you believe our government's not hypocritical....then that is your CHOICE! I believe our choices are being curtailed more than any school lunch could ever be!
Because it is another "brick in the wall' of government control....subtle as it may be ...it's happening all around us, and I resent it, okay?
Why is it so hard for you to grasp that the government is not controlling you whatsoever in this instance?
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Because it is another "brick in the wall' of government control....subtle as it may be ...it's happening all around us, and I resent it, okay?
Why is it so hard for you to grasp that the government is not controlling you whatsoever in this instance?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Because it is another "brick in the wall' of government control....subtle as it may be ...it's happening all around us, and I resent it, okay?
Why is it so hard for you to grasp that the government is not controlling you whatsoever in this instance?
You resent that they are regulating something that you do not have to participate in (in fact, something that is a luxury, more or less)?
Seriously, the sense of entitlement these days is scary.
Originally posted by elrem48
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Because it is another "brick in the wall' of government control....subtle as it may be ...it's happening all around us, and I resent it, okay?
Why is it so hard for you to grasp that the government is not controlling you whatsoever in this instance?
You resent that they are regulating something that you do not have to participate in (in fact, something that is a luxury, more or less)?
Seriously, the sense of entitlement these days is scary.
Wow, Sir, what is it YOU'RE saying that I feel entitled to??? My attempts to explain what irks me about this has been futile. Please read Wrabbit2000's reply on page one which I just saw now....he said it better than I, so maybe you'll finally understand where I'm coming from.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Because it is another "brick in the wall' of government control....subtle as it may be ...it's happening all around us, and I resent it, okay?
Why is it so hard for you to grasp that the government is not controlling you whatsoever in this instance?
You resent that they are regulating something that you do not have to participate in (in fact, something that is a luxury, more or less)?
Seriously, the sense of entitlement these days is scary.
Wow, Sir, what is it YOU'RE saying that I feel entitled to??? My attempts to explain what irks me about this has been futile. Please read Wrabbit2000's reply on page one which I just saw now....he said it better than I, so maybe you'll finally understand where I'm coming from.
If you believe that the school lunch regulations fall under government control, that means you believe school lunch is a right that you are entitled to. That is what I am saying.
so who's nose does belong in regulating public school lunches?
Originally posted by elrem48
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Because it is another "brick in the wall' of government control....subtle as it may be ...it's happening all around us, and I resent it, okay?
Why is it so hard for you to grasp that the government is not controlling you whatsoever in this instance?
You resent that they are regulating something that you do not have to participate in (in fact, something that is a luxury, more or less)?
Seriously, the sense of entitlement these days is scary.
Wow, Sir, what is it YOU'RE saying that I feel entitled to??? My attempts to explain what irks me about this has been futile. Please read Wrabbit2000's reply on page one which I just saw now....he said it better than I, so maybe you'll finally understand where I'm coming from.
If you believe that the school lunch regulations fall under government control, that means you believe school lunch is a right that you are entitled to. That is what I am saying.
Oh my! I KNOW the government is sticking its nose where it doesn't belong...as usual! THE END!
so who's nose does belong in regulating public school lunches?
I grasp, I grasp! Poor, poor schools with their "limited, self-sustaining budget!" Okay, let them feed low-quality food to the children! Is that because they have much CONCERN for their growing brains? In all sincerity, is that kind of food so much better than what they used to serve? Reminds me of the scaled down portions in supermarket products....I suppose they do this because they care about our "fatness," however I don't see the PRICES going down....they actually increase with the rationed portions! It's a travesty and me thinks you know it!
Schools are not restaurants. There is a limited, self-sustaining budget which they must use to create their menu. Which means there are limited options available.
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I grasp, I grasp! Poor, poor schools with their "limited, self-sustaining budget!" Okay, let them feed low-quality food to the children! Is that because they have much CONCERN for their growing brains? In all sincerity, is that kind of food so much better than what they used to serve? Reminds me of the scaled down portions in supermarket products....I suppose they do this because they care about our "fatness," however I don't see the PRICES going down....they actually increase with the rationed portions! It's a travesty and me thinks you know it!
Schools are not restaurants. There is a limited, self-sustaining budget which they must use to create their menu. Which means there are limited options available.
And again, the bottom line here, is that you are not forced to buy these lunches. You are complaining about the options given by the school. YOU DONT HAVE TO BUY THEM. If you were forced, you MIGHT have an argument. The fact that it is TOTALLY OPTIONAL means you are expecting them to cater to you.
.
No, you dont grasp. Do you know what a self-sustaining budget is? Obviously not, given your comment about pricing
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Leave the kids alone FEDS! Let the multicorps screw them! McD for all schools!
Originally posted by elrem48
reply to post by captaintyinknots
.
No, you dont grasp. Do you know what a self-sustaining budget is? Obviously not, given your comment about pricing
So it doesn't bother you to pay more for your food and actually get less for your money? And crappier quality to boot! Good for you!edit on 27-8-2012 by elrem48 because: (no reason given)