It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Are these GAMMA RAY bubbles MOVING towards SOL space?

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 27 2012 @ 01:30 PM
Really good thread, and this is the issue. I've posted links to that or a similar picture a few times on ATS, because, just what is that, is it incoming? Well I think the energy is but then what is this energy?

For example I hear of the influx radiation from the sun and cosmos and the flares that will come in very strong in 2013. Now there are some threads about the possible dangers of these radiations.

(one of the possible dangers of the warming up or radiated earth idea, to me is the methane that is bubbling up in the arctic area, seemingly untrapped by the ice currently and a very real danger to us, if it gets worse and solutions aren't found.)

But I've only had the most wonderful experiences from CME's and Guides, that occur during this time, like a council meeting. So, to me the energies coming are wonderful and I have no fear of them.

But do wonder if part of the cycles have to do with these energies. ie, the cycles that are around 26 000 years remind me of the distance of 26 000 years ie, from the Galactic Center. ie. so, does the Mayan calendar have to do with this energy then?

posted on Aug, 27 2012 @ 01:36 PM

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Soloro

Electromagnetic energy and photons get hyper accelerated when around the Supermassive black hole.

Electromagnetic energy and photons travel at the speed of light. They cannot be "hyper accelerated".

Yeah right. I for one do not share Einstein's theories!

And science has already shown they are in error.

In fact, he worked in a patent office and did not invent the "theory" of relativity.


This was echoed in March 2003 by data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (3), dubbed by professional observers as "the best map yet of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation."

Also, according to recent research, laser laboratories in the continental USA were able to transmit laser beams through various media, such as gas and plasma, at speeds 300 times greater than the strict limit of 180,000 miles per second set by Einstein. (4)

With the toppling of its two major pillars, isotropy and fixed light velocity, notes Nicolai, we see Einstein’s position joining the history of science’s failed attempts to understand reality. ....
The Theory of the Universe
and Objective Reality

The essence of this postulate in that the velocity of light in a vacuum is fixed, in other words, a constant, and the maximum possible velocity of motion of matter in the Universe equals 300,000 km/sec (186,000 mile/sec). Without this condition the Lorentz transformations become nonsense, because, when matter (and even light) moves with a speed greater than 186,000 mile/sec even the mass of a photon be-comes infinite according to these equations.

Let us examine now how matters unfold with this postulate of Einstein’s theory.

Dr. Lijun Wang obtained surprising results in his experiment performed at the NEC Research Institute in Princeton. The experiment consisted of passing light impulses through a vessel filled with a specially treated gas, caesium. The results appeared to be phenomenal: the speed of light impulses appeared to be 300 (three hundred) times greater than the allowed speed from the Lorentz transformations (recorded in 2000)!

In Italy (in 2000), another group of physicists from the Italian National Research Council conducted the experiments with microwaves. The speed of their distribution was 25% faster than the maximum pos-sible speed stipulated by Einstein. It follows from the Lorentz transformations that, if the velocity of light (or other material objects) exceeds the speed of 186,000 mile/sec, in even one millimeter per second, the mass would become infinite.

In other words, in these experiments the mass of photons and microwaves should be greater than the mass of any "black hole", and, according to the formulas of Einstein’s theory, our planet would turn into a super "black hole" as a result of these experiments. However, nothing of the kind happened; both light and radio waves remained simply waves and their mass did not tend toward infinity, etc.

edit on 27-8-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 27 2012 @ 03:25 PM
reply to post by Unity_99

When I saw the words Theory of the Universe I thought of Douglas Adams:

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.There is another theory which states that this has already happened." - Douglas Adams

Sorry to be off topic but it made me laugh and when I see humor I have to let it ride .

posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 03:59 AM
They're already here. The Fermi telescope accumulates gamma sun sun rays.

posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 06:05 AM

Originally posted by Unity_99

Yeah right. I for one do not share Einstein's theories!

And science has already shown they are in error.
First, your source doesn't support this, and second, even if there is an error or some kind of tweak needed, the model has been extremely useful.

"All models are wrong; some models are useful." -George Box

We now know that Newton's theory was wrong, but we can still say it was extremely useful and we still teach it in school because it's so useful.

Likewise, even if Einstein's theory needs some tweaking which it might, it's a very good model like Newton's, because it also makes accurate predictions. So I'm open to Einstein's theory needing some tweaking like Newton's did, but you haven't found any evidence it needs to be tweaked. There's a whole list of things at this link that go faster than light without violating relativity:

Faster than light
Specifically phase velocity or group velocity can exceed the speed of light and they are often cited in experiments demonstrating faster than light. If you think it's something other than this, maybe link to a peer-reviewed paper instead of a physician in training linking to without even a story reference.

Don't you recognize how useful Newton's model has been, and continues to be, even though it's "wrong"?

posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 10:32 AM
Fine...ill be the one to ask . Ophiucus...why do you spell Earth like this: EA*RTH?


top topics
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in