reply to post by KingAtlas
Have you ever researched the wealth of information that actually proves evolution is not a valid theory overall?
There is not nearly enough proof of evolution out there, way too many holes in that theory. I have seen scientists who, after much research into the
topic, actually converted to faith in a living God because of all the evidence in support of creation. Here is an example:
"Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are
several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this
Ronald R. West, PhD (paleoecology and geology) (Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University), "Paleoecology and
uniformitarianism". Compass, vol. 45, May 1968, p. 216
Isn't that what atheists usually accuse Christians of doing?
At this point, many Darwinists will usually trot out the same handful of incredibly weak, totally laughable examples of "transitional forms" that
have been debunked and discredited time after time.
For example "Archaeopteryx" has been used as "proof" of evolution for years, mostly because scientists can't find anything better to support
their case. Fortunately, it is very easy to debunk....
The cold, hard truth of the matter is that if Darwinian evolution was true there would be millions and millions and millions of very clear
transitional fossils in the fossil record.
But their "theory" has a huge problem.
The fossils are simply not there.
"Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the
species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find
them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?"
There are millions and millions of fossilized creatures out there. So why can't we find tons of transitional forms among all of those fossils?
Well, as one prominent evolutionist once explained, it is because they simply are not there....
"In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another."
-Evolutionist Stephen M. Stanley, Johns Hopkins University