It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by windword
You don't seem to understand the basics of female biology and ovulation or understand the life of the sperm. A woman can become pregnant up to 5 days after intercourse. Ovulation can be brought on, out of cycle, by sexual arousal, and happen hours, even days, after intercourse. Remedies like a diaphragm and the rhythm method will fail inder these circumstances.
Your argument is circular, illogical and based on your personal bias.
On one hand you say the women are not victims of their biology and then on the other hand you if a woman indulges her biological urges and gets pregnant, then ethically, she must bear the biological responsibilities forced on her by biology.
You place some sort of magical attributes on a biological process and then impose your personal morals accordingly.
You "believe" that the fertilized egg is sacred, therefore condemning a majority of the kinds of birth control being used today
Your only argument is that women should either abstain and ignore their physical needs, or get sterilized, ending any prospect of motherhood at a later date when they are ready, willing and able to be a parent.
Your viewpoint is unreasonable, outdated and puritanical. That sex Genii isn't going back into the bottle. Sexual expression isn't going to diminish, and stifling it is only going to make matters worse.
Victims often act out their abuses and the cycle of abuse continues and is perpetuated.
Originally posted by beezzer
I wonder what the civil rights movement would have looked like if they just had blacks working on it?
Originally posted by Charmed707
reply to post by TempleCat
Your argument is based on the belief system that fetuses are not worthy of any rights and that women can be victims of their own actions. There are proponents of abortion that argue that babies in general don't have personhood- even after they born.
A woman who gets pregnanat as a result of her actions is not having her rights violated.
But you don't have a problem with slavery- you think it's acceptable to force someone to pay for the choices of others.
My point is that abortion is NOT an issue that only affects 'women's bodies'.
....but genetics don't matter to you. The fact that it's genetically your child has no relevance in being able to avoid responsibility for it. Contribution to genetics doesn't mean he has a choice in whether his child will live or die. There's no logical reason why he should be obligated to pay for a woman's choice.
...and he has 0% responsibility in choosing to grow a child that will need to be taken care of. Again, his actions in getting her pregnant doesn't mean he has any say whether an 'actual child' will be created or not. That's 100% the responsibility of the woman, therefore, the child's needs are 100% her responsibility.
That's not how it works. Women aren't forced to pay when they play... Consenting to sex is not consenting to parenthood.
Originally posted by Charmed707
reply to post by TempleCat
The woman is the one makes the choice to create a child. She chose not to have an abortion and chose to grow a child that would need to be taken care of.
...but women own men?
You're advocating for the control of men and telling them that they're responsible for women's choices. I don't think you're really thinking this through.
The notion that women have a 'right' to abortion and that men have no say in the matter and are still obligated to take responsibility is a modern social construct created by deadbeats.
Since when does having sex with someone equal caring about them? Even if he does care about her, that doesn't mean he doesn't care about his child....and if she kills his child. then he has absolutley no obligation to respect or support her in any way whatsoever. If women can make choices for men, then it's only logical that men can make choices for women.
If they don't even have to have their mother's life support, then forget all those trivial aspects. Besides, women are now financially independent and can pay for their own choices.
You can't refute what I said.
The ONLY positive thing I can see coming from rampant abortion on demand is that it's killing western civilization faster.
Originally posted by Charmed707
reply to post by windword
Originally posted by windword
You don't seem to understand the basics of female biology and ovulation or understand the life of the sperm. A woman can become pregnant up to 5 days after intercourse. Ovulation can be brought on, out of cycle, by sexual arousal, and happen hours, even days, after intercourse. Remedies like a diaphragm and the rhythm method will fail inder these circumstances.
That doesn't equal 'anytime' as you claimed.
Traditionally, it has been thought that ovulation takes place only once in every menstruation cycle. A growth wave of 15 to 20 egg-carrying cells called follicles occurs before ovulation. One follicle will become dominant while the others die off.
"It's been assumed until now that women have just one wave per monthly cycle, leading to one ovulation, but nobody has actually carried out detailed analysis before," said Roger Pierson, who led the study. "In fact, all the women in our study had at least two waves and 30 per cent of them had three."
www.newscientist.com...
Your argument is circular, illogical and based on your personal bias.
If mine is, then so is yours. I'm only speaking about the biological process while you're attributing subjective characteristics to it that you have formed an opinion about.
On one hand you say the women are not victims of their biology and then on the other hand you if a woman indulges her biological urges and gets pregnant, then ethically, she must bear the biological responsibilities forced on her by biology.
You have a choice whether to entertain your urges. Are pedophiles and rapists victims of their biology as well?
You place some sort of magical attributes on a biological process and then impose your personal morals accordingly.
You're the one treating the biological process of reproduction as a curse and acting like it's unique to humans.
You "believe" that the fertilized egg is sacred, therefore condemning a majority of the kinds of birth control being used today
You 'believe' that women are too stupid to realize the consequences of their actions and are therefore 'victims' who have authority over someone else's life.
Your only argument is that women should either abstain and ignore their physical needs, or get sterilized, ending any prospect of motherhood at a later date when they are ready, willing and able to be a parent.
Desire is not the same thing as a 'need'. You are 'ready' to be a parent when you're sexually mature. Someone who would abort their child, especially for a purely self-serving purpose, is easily a danger to any child they may have later on. Sterilization doesn't end any prospect of parenthood anyway. There is always the option of adoption.
Your viewpoint is unreasonable, outdated and puritanical. That sex Genii isn't going back into the bottle. Sexual expression isn't going to diminish, and stifling it is only going to make matters worse.
Your viewpoint in purely based on the twisted notion that an adult can be a victim of their own choices and actions. As for 'outdated', I don't conform to a certain mindset just because it is en vogue at the time. You're the one is trying to stifle the outcome of 'sexual expression'. Offering financial compensation to those who will get themselves sterilized would be an extremely good thing for all involved. Women who took the offer could have all the sex they want with no worry of getting pregnant. Not to mention it's good for eugenics purposes.
Originally posted by TempleCat
A fertilized egg doesn't have any rights.
It doesn't live and breath on its own.
It does not think for itself.
Everyone is the victim of their own actions.
Women take responsibility and make responsible decisions that are best for them and their children.
When a woman gets pregnant because her birth control failed it is a violation of her rights to have the government force her into compliance and servitude.
Taking care of your own children is slavery?
Again, the woman pays for the child through blood, sweat, tears, food, shelter, and care. Why are you giving the father a free pass?
He was there for conception.
It certainly doesn't affect a man's body, does it?
So if a man wants the woman to have an abortion that's ok with you?
You seem awfully concerned in all these posts with the poor misunderstood man and how you and he should band together and control the womb of another person so you can abandon the baby after birth. Kinda creepy. He was there to do the deed. You've been talking in circles so much during this whole debate.
All women get pregnant on purpose
The man shouldn't have to pay for his children
but the woman should be forced into motherhood
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
One very simple rule that everyone needs to learn that applies to every question:
The girl is always right, even when she isn't.
Learn it. Live it. Love it. Your life will be all the better for it.
edit on 23-8-2012 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TempleCat
the man should own the woman because he doesn't have a uterus of his own
as long as the egg is in the woman it belongs to the government.. and the man!"
You should really listen to yourself
The woman doesn't have any say whether an 'actual child' will accidentally be created or not when she has protected sex, either.
Women truly are forced to pay mentally, physically, and financially.
On top of that there are "those people" who love to persecute women, with their holier-than-thou control issues and their "women are evil and must be punished" mentality.
Originally posted by TempleCat
Women don't always make a conscious choice to get pregnant. If they did they wouldn't use birth control. Wait a minute... You're taking the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" mentality. Now you're persecuting her for choosing not to have an abortion!
Nope.
I'm telling them they're responsible for the consequences of having sex. Just like women.
Yet it's the women who has to carry the child and often takes 100% responsibility.
For the child's sake.
First you're advocating for women to be forced into maternity, then you're advocating that they shouldn't because the man will have to share in being a parent.
Child support isn't about the woman. It's about the child.
Children do much better if the father is there both emotionally and financially.
In fact, I've refuted your path of reasoning several times.
There are 314,411,944 people in America right now, by the way. I don't think western civilization is going to go extinct.
Originally posted by windword
Please tell me, when is it that a woman CAN"T get pregnant?
More circular, irrelevant arguments.
There you go again attributing the biological process with all knowing. Biological readiness is NOT the same being ready mentally, financially and spiritually. Really, do you care about the children at all, or just about forcing young girls to give birth as a punishment for their crime?
It's okay, you can join us in the 21st century.
Originally posted by Charmed707
Originally posted by windword
Please tell me, when is it that a woman CAN"T get pregnant?
As I have been referring to all along- when she's sterile or not sexually active.
More circular, irrelevant arguments.
Why won't you answer the question?
There you go again attributing the biological process with all knowing. Biological readiness is NOT the same being ready mentally, financially and spiritually. Really, do you care about the children at all, or just about forcing young girls to give birth as a punishment for their crime?
THIS is a true and most obvious example of circular arguments. Answered and refuted.
It's okay, you can join us in the 21st century.
Yet another conformist talking point. I was referring to the notion that a woman actually has a 'right' to abortion as being en vogue in this day and age.
Originally posted by windword
Not gonna happen. You can't impose your morality onto others.
What question?
A woman does have the right to an abortion.