posted on Aug, 23 2012 @ 08:56 PM
FDR began the New Deal and President Obama has expanded upon it. Suggesting he is going to loose because the do nothing congress did nothing, for
makes little sense. Presidents are not kings they cannot order congress to do what they want them to do based upon some penalty if they do not.
The economy is not the presidents fault the problem is with congress.
Willard Mitchel Romney evaded taxes when he placed his money into of shore accounts, not only on the money he put in, also the interests he earned.
Clearly he is hiding that, with respect to the only year he has provided in taxes? He did not submit the form related to his of shore accounts, he had
to have received amnesty, meaning he is guilty of tax evasion. This could actually justify reasoning for impeachment, meaning he would resign and
guess who becomes president.??? Personally I do
not feel at all comfortable with electing a person into office who would be in prison if it were
not for the issue of him being really rich.
I feel it is really silly to consider Willard a viable candidate for the highest office in the United States but not because he is Republican.
Ron Paul won in Iowa, why did it take so long for that information to be accurately presented in the press? They insisted that Romney had won well
into the primaries. Despite the fact that it was not true, which makes little sense under the circumstances. Ron Paul is the kind of person who would
expose the problems with the system while Willard is not.
For the record I am an independent.
edit on 23-8-2012 by Kashai because: midified content