It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Better question for the whole of ATS, why [snip] are ya'll so eager to see millions of us fail and die?
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Really? Bush allowed 9/11 to happen by not taking the threat seriously. Or if you're a truther he planned it. He also put us into 2 wars, one through an absolute lie. Warantless wiretapping, patriot act.
Are you planning to Rebel if Romney is elected? If not, you're a lost cause. Romney is very much like Obama in his major political policies.
edit on 22-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by th3onetruth
Better question for the whole of ATS, why the fu&k are ya'll so eager to see millions of us fail and die?
Who said we do???
I'd much rather Texas be a proud member of the Union instead of bitching and moaning about threatening to secede everytime something happens that they disagree with. This is what children do...threaten to leave and run away when they don't get to do what they want. Grow up Texas and stop with your empty threats.
I'm not gonna find all the related facts that you simply don't bother to look for. This is one example, and like I said, I'm not your teacher you need to learn stuff on your own. There are more examples but I'm not your mother.
Originally posted by SadButTrue
He is correct about his assumptions that Obama and others want the UN to trump the constitution. This isn't the first time someone in the Obama administration has threatened to use UN troops or power to do something with the USA.
Don't pretend he calling for an armed rebellion.... He said if these laws passed and UN troops come to the US. Don't fear monger and put words into his mouth.
Originally posted by Chickensalad
I guess I didn't read the part about him being a Republican or actually anything that told his political affiliation.
Just because somebody is against Obama doesn't mean that they are GOP.
Sounds like Outkast is trying to spin a story again....
They don't like the guy you like, so they must be crazy or even worse, they must be a Republican.....
I have always thought we should. If we can survive and thrive by ourselves, why not do it. It would be more childish to stay with mommy and daddy USA than it would be to go off and live on our own like responsible "adults". Since you wanted to calls us babies, thought that analogy would help you.
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Why should we respond with force? As long as we get our personnel and equipment back let them go. Inside of ten years they will either be annexed by Mexico or begging for statehood again. Sort of like that teenager that can't wait until they are 18 to move out and find it is a lot harder than they thought.
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
And so if you don't want to be part of our country anymore...why shouldn't we respond with force against you???
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by Chickensalad
I guess I didn't read the part about him being a Republican or actually anything that told his political affiliation.
Just because somebody is against Obama doesn't mean that they are GOP.
Sounds like Outkast is trying to spin a story again....
They don't like the guy you like, so they must be crazy or even worse, they must be a Republican.....
Or, he actualy is a Republican.
Here...here is an article that actualy spells it out for you.
www.kcbd.com...
LUBBOCK, TX (KCBD) -
From Lubbock County Democratic Party
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it...At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it....link