posted on Aug, 23 2012 @ 08:28 PM
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Im not surpruised at all to see this. Its a signal, in my opinion, to Assad, that Russia is not going to get involved should a conflict
occur.
They were never going to get directly involved, and have made it clear that they would not. But I think you knew that. Russia's approach to
international issues and conflicts is fairly pragmatic and predictable. It has not, and will not intervene directly in any conflict where its own
territory or that of its closest allies is not in danger. Syria is nowhere near being a "closest ally" - there would be limited solely to Belarus,
Armenia, and Kazakhstan.
What I think is more relevant when it comes to Syria, is how Russia can intervene "indirectly" - meaning not involving its own military assets or
personel. This can mean exercising influence in international forums (UN), supplying arms and intelligence, or pulling strings elsewhere in the world
to test US/NATO's resolve.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Its been stated many times that Russia is not going to risk their own interests in order to protect Syria. While it requires Putins approval the fact
a senior Russian military officer has suggested this possibility tells me its something Putin knows about and has been briefed on.
The Naval chief is not going to make a comment of that magnitude on his own without approval.
Well, you don't know Russian armed forces commanders very well. Many of them are fairly reckless in running their mouth, especially since the
military conduct is not nearly as strict as it was in Soviet times. They will be reprimanded only if what they say significantly contradicts the
boss's intent or hurts his image. In this case Kremlin may have considered the comments not to be too off-base. Russia doesn't mind if its
intentions and resolve appear more aggresive than they really are. But US and NATO know the game well enough not to pay attention to
attention-seeking officers.
Russia is not the main reason why US has not yet intervened in Syria. US, Israel, and a number of other countries like Assad and Syria exactly where
they are at right now - mired in an internal conflict without an end in sight. It keeps Assad busy, and keeps him away from the international arena
and the militant factions he had ties with. It keeps Iran concerned. And nobody really minds the herd being thinned a bit - including all sides
involved in the fighting. Despite what it may seem like, Syria is in a stable position right now - a stalemate with each punch-drunk side becoming
weaker. US could take some risks with stability in Libya, but Syria is a more serious matter. US and some of its allies are not very happy about how
Egypt turned out.
Also, the Syrian rebels will not attack the Russian base. That will not get them anything of value.
edit on 23-8-2012 by maloy because: (no
reason given)