It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The same sentiment a year ago motivated magistrates to play to the gallery by jailing 1,292 people for stealing bottles of water or trainers or sending idiot incitements during the dispersed rampage dubbed "urban riots". Hysterical ministers raced home from holiday to tell judges to send messages. Judges duly ruined the lives of hundreds of young people, at great public expense and to no advantage to their victims. I have no sympathy for these people either, but again the politicised response to crime was disproportionate.
A month before, a London court jailed a stoned Charlie Gilmour after he swung on a union flag from the Cenotaph and tossed a bin at a police car, thus causing widespread outrage in the offices of the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail. The judge sent him down for 18 months to send a message carefully designed to wreck his university career. Yet again we need have no sympathy for Gilmour. But there is no such thing as a rap over the knuckles in jail. Judges know that any term in prison is a sentence for life.
Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge
Just want to point out that the band did not steal anything, did not throw trash bins at police officers,did not destroy anything, did not damage any property, did not plot to make Molotov thing and did not harm anyone physically.
They sang in Church against Putin, without permission.
24 months of labour camps. Half a year in jail during trial.
Hypocricy? Yes, OP - this thread is full of it.edit on 22-8-2012 by ZeroKnowledge because: (no reason given)edit on 22-8-2012 by ZeroKnowledge because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpaceCadet69
still ..... i think it`s a little strange how most media outlets around the world are saying the words PUSSY RIOT all day long.
Doesnt it seem "odd" to anyone else ?
Sky news also spoke to a man named Dick who invented a "flop" when they first started reporting PUSSY RIOT.
Thier music sounds crap anyway , that`s why they locked em up
Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge
Just want to point out that the band did not steal anything, did not throw trash bins at police officers,did not destroy anything, did not damage any property, did not plot to make Molotov thing and did not harm anyone physically.
They sang in Church against Putin, without permission.
24 months of labour camps. Half a year in jail during trial.
Hypocricy? Yes, OP - this thread is full of it.edit on 22-8-2012 by ZeroKnowledge because: (no reason given)edit on 22-8-2012 by ZeroKnowledge because: (no reason given)
The fact that Christ the Savior Cathedral had become a significant symbol in the political strategy of our powers that be was already clear to many thinking people when Vladimir Putin’s former [KGB] colleague Kirill Gundyaev took over as head of the Russian Orthodox Church. After this happened, Christ the Savior Cathedral began to be used openly as a flashy setting for the politics of the security services, which are the main source of power [in Russia].
Why did Putin feel the need to exploit the Orthodox religion and its aesthetics? After all, he could have employed his own, far more secular tools of power—for example, national corporations, or his menacing police system, or his own obedient judiciary system. It may be that the tough, failed policies of Putin’s government, the incident with the submarine Kursk, the bombings of civilians in broad daylight, and other unpleasant moments in his political career forced him to ponder the fact that it was high time to resign; otherwise, the citizens of Russia would help him do this. Apparently, it was then that he felt the need for more convincing, transcendental guarantees of his long tenure at the helm. It was here that the need arose to make use of the aesthetics of the Orthodox religion, historically associated with the heyday of Imperial Russia, where power came not from earthly manifestations such as democratic elections and civil society, but from God Himself.
It was also fairly logical that the Russian Orthodox Church, given its long mystical ties to power, emerged as the project’s principal exponent in the media. It was decided that, unlike in the Soviet era, when the church opposed, above all, the brutality of the authorities towards history itself, the Russian Orthodox Church should now confront all pernicious manifestations of contemporary mass culture with its concept of diversity and tolerance.
Implementing this thoroughly interesting political project has required considerable quantities of professional lighting and video equipment, air time on national TV channels for hours-long live broadcasts, and numerous background shoots for morally and ethically edifying news stories, where the Patriarch’s well-constructed speeches would in fact be presented, thus helping the faithful make the correct political choice during the difficult time for Putin preceding the election. Moreover, the filming must be continuous; the necessary images must be burned into the memory and constantly updated; they must create the impression of something natural, constant and compulsory.
Originally posted by Beavers
reply to post by woodwardjnr
If i put on a balaclava and ran into Westminister Abbey, I wouldn't get 2 years, I'D GET SHOT!