It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by LeSigh
If she had been sentenced for breaking the plea agreement by revealing their names... any idea what her punishment would have been?
The prospect of it being anywhere near as severe as the sexual offenders makes my skin crawl.
Originally posted by LeSigh
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by LeSigh
If she had been sentenced for breaking the plea agreement by revealing their names... any idea what her punishment would have been?
The prospect of it being anywhere near as severe as the sexual offenders makes my skin crawl.
I had to look this up as I didn't know. Apparently, she could face up to 180 days in jail and a $500 fine. Keep in mind that the boys had yet to be sentenced at the time of the article (July 23rd), when she Tweeted about it.
www.dailypaul.com...
ETA: You know what disturbs me here (and forgive me if I'm misreading what people are saying) is this double standard thinking. The concept that girls/women must be the responsible ones in any given situation or they can expect terrible things to happen to them, whereas boys/men are not to be blamed too harshly for being irresponsible concerning perpetrating any nonconsensual sexual acts. Because, clearly, a woman who lets her guard down for even a minute is fair game as men apparently aren't expected to have any self-control when presented with the opportunity. Boys will be boys and girls must constantly fight for their own virtue and deserve to have it destroyed if they step one toe out of line.
Sure- we should raise girls to be diligent and responsible. However- this begs the question (as it is NEVER mentioned that I've ever seen)- how should boys be raised?edit on 22-8-2012 by LeSigh because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by Golf66
True words spoken through emotion. Try to be logical.
Granted, if these boys did in fact penetrate this girl, they deserve to rot. But if they only touched or took pictures, they should be punished as well and in the same breath, if they didn't penetrate she had no right to call them rapist.
I've known many girls that cried rape when in fact they werent. And in some circumstances I know of women who cried rape after having consensual sex, they were just embarrassed the next day for their actions so they had to "cover" for it.
ETA: innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply when it comes to rape.edit on 22-8-2012 by kimish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by Golf66
True words spoken through emotion. Try to be logical.
Granted, if these boys did in fact penetrate this girl, they deserve to rot. But if they only touched or took pictures, they should be punished as well and in the same breath, if they didn't penetrate she had no right to call them rapist.
I've known many girls that cried rape when in fact they werent. And in some circumstances I know of women who cried rape after having consensual sex, they were just embarrassed the next day for their actions so they had to "cover" for it.
ETA: innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply when it comes to rape.edit on 22-8-2012 by kimish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by captaintyinknots
They admitted penetration, ie. intercourse? If not then it's not rape, she had no right to call it that, sexual assault yes, rape no.edit on 22-8-2012 by kimish because: (no reason given)
ETA: maybe she needs a lesson in semantics, that's all.edit on 22-8-2012 by kimish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by Amanda5
Nobody teaches boys or men to do things like that, it's something called hormones, particularly Testosterone which has been scientifically proven to make people think irrationally. Food for thought especially when combined with the effects of alcohol.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by captaintyinknots
If they didn't rape then wouldn't the correct term to coin them be "sexual assaultists" ? After all, they sexually assaulted the girl, they didn't rape her, correct?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by Amanda5
Nobody teaches boys or men to do things like that, it's something called hormones, particularly Testosterone which has been scientifically proven to make people think irrationally. Food for thought especially when combined with the effects of alcohol.
Again, boohoo. I had hormones as a teen. I never sexually assaulted anyone. The same is true of the majority of males out there.
Somewhere along the line, these boys were taught it was ok, whether directly, or through seeing the actions of others that do such things and get away with it.
Again, a nice big "Sexual Predator" tattoo on their forehead would be a good start.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by captaintyinknots
If they didn't rape then wouldn't the correct term to coin them be "sexual assaultists" ? After all, they sexually assaulted the girl, they didn't rape her, correct?
we dont know for sure. She claims they did. Either way, they have admitted to sexual assault, and frankly, assault, rape, either way, they are the scum of the earth and deserve to be labelled for all to see.
and really, the proper term would be "sexual predator", as thats what they are. They sought out the weak of the herd, and preyed upon her.
Originally posted by kimish
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by Amanda5
Nobody teaches boys or men to do things like that, it's something called hormones, particularly Testosterone which has been scientifically proven to make people think irrationally. Food for thought especially when combined with the effects of alcohol.
Again, boohoo. I had hormones as a teen. I never sexually assaulted anyone. The same is true of the majority of males out there.
Somewhere along the line, these boys were taught it was ok, whether directly, or through seeing the actions of others that do such things and get away with it.
Again, a nice big "Sexual Predator" tattoo on their forehead would be a good start.
Do you know they were taught it's ok? Do you have proof to back it up? In my 32 years of living I've never witnessed anything that OK's or suggests that raping is ok. Unless you're from S.A. where the men think that it's their obligation to take what they want from women.
Originally posted by kimish
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by captaintyinknots
If they didn't rape then wouldn't the correct term to coin them be "sexual assaultists" ? After all, they sexually assaulted the girl, they didn't rape her, correct?
we dont know for sure. She claims they did. Either way, they have admitted to sexual assault, and frankly, assault, rape, either way, they are the scum of the earth and deserve to be labelled for all to see.
and really, the proper term would be "sexual predator", as thats what they are. They sought out the weak of the herd, and preyed upon her.
We don't know for sure soo in lieu of that Rapist is not the correct term to use for the perps, correct?
ETA: at first, and many times you called them rapist, which is incorrect
edit on 22-8-2012 by kimish because: (no reason given)