It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

a motion introduced to place a ban on cigarette sales to anyone born after the year 2000?

page: 8
15
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by akushla99

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by randomtangentsrme
 


Their airspace is what hits their lungs. Sorry we can't divide the world up in some imaginary world.



Hopefully you do not eat meat...because the amount of methane from meat production really is taking my air away...

A99


Yes I smelled the cow at the farm fart. Get real. Another poor comparison... Next...




posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by akushla99
 


Drinking doesn't emit smoke... Next poor comparison...


Cars do...
Trucks do...
Factories do...

...which other one of these could be contributing to lung cancer...any idea?

A99



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Poopooplatter

Originally posted by akushla99

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by randomtangentsrme
 


Their airspace is what hits their lungs. Sorry we can't divide the world up in some imaginary world.



Hopefully you do not eat meat...because the amount of methane from meat production really is taking my air away...

A99


Yes I smelled the cow at the farm fart. Get real. Another poor comparison... Next...


You patently have no idea what you're talking about...research my friend...

Take it up with Scientific Amercan dear sir...

A99
edit on 22-8-2012 by akushla99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by aaron2209

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by akushla99
 


Drinking doesn't emit smoke... Next poor comparison...


Damn looks like we've been outsmarted!


Well you make it too easy



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by akushla99
 


Drinking doesn't emit smoke... Next poor comparison...


You are right though, it doesn't emit smoke. It only causes cancer, causes addiction, creates a drain on our public health system and "costs society" billions

But your right it's no comparison to something that causes cancer, causes addiction, creates a drain on our public health system and "costs society" billions



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:32 AM
link   
reply to post by akushla99
 



I know exactly what's going on. We are comparing someone making you breathe second hand smoke to cow methane. You can't compare the two.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   
reply to post by aaron2209
 


We weren't comparing health risks but nice try tesla.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Poopooplatter
 


Smokers have been asked to move from doorways, public buildings and the like, is it so hard to ask non smokers to move away from directly downwind?
I too am sorry we cannot divide the world.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by akushla99
 


Drinking doesn't emit smoke... Next poor comparison...



About 3 million violent crimes occur each year in which victims perceive the offender to have been drinking at the time of the offense.


alcoholism.about.com...

3 million people would disagree.


Another 40,933 died from car crashes and other mishaps caused by excessive alcohol use.


40,000 (From one country) are unable to disagree

www.msnbc.msn.com...

Second hand smoke is said to of killed 600,000 people worldwide.

www.theglobeandmail.com...

Your argument is not valid.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by akushla99
 



I know exactly what's going on. We are comparing someone making you breathe second hand smoke to cow methane. You can't compare the two.


Absolutely can!

Its a no-brainer! My air is being compromised!

A99



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:34 AM
link   
reply to post by randomtangentsrme
 


No the smoker moves down wind...



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:35 AM
link   
There's no point discussing anything with someone that chooses to ignore all the facts. I think I shall do what I should have been doing all along and ignoring the baseless, pointless dribble.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by boncho
Second hand smoke is said to of killed 600,000 people worldwide.


and even that is up for debate.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:37 AM
link   
reply to post by akushla99
 


No you can't. The methane discussion is for another thread. Get rid of the cows. And the smokers.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Poopooplatter
 


The smoker stays where they have been deemed legal to be. If you have a complaint from there, take it up with your government.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by aaron2209

Originally posted by boncho
Second hand smoke is said to of killed 600,000 people worldwide.


and even that is up for debate.


I agree with you. I'm just posting the numbers and stats that the other side of the argument is using.

I don't care what numbers are made up for either, I don't believe a government should tell it's people what they can and can't put in their bodies. Especially seeing as many things governments do, lead to equal if not greater suffering than what our vices bring.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by aaron2209

Originally posted by boncho
Second hand smoke is said to of killed 600,000 people worldwide.


and even that is up for debate.


Absolutely 'up for debate'...

We are meant to believe that there have been NO OTHER contributing factors in this 'second-hand' corrupted oxygen?...so...must be smokers!...brilliant deduction...

A99



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by aaron2209
There's no point discussing anything with someone that chooses to ignore all the facts. I think I shall do what I should have been doing all along and ignoring the baseless, pointless dribble.


Your dribble is from the nipple of an ignorance I can't even imagine. I've had a solid debate to every point you've had. You can keep circling around the same baseless arguments, but you won't be anymore right.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Poopooplatter
reply to post by akushla99
 


No you can't. The methane discussion is for another thread. Get rid of the cows. And the smokers.


Yes I can...quality of breathable air!...

A99



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:41 AM
link   
so reply to post by randomtangentsrme
 


Sorry from now on instead of discussing government policy on a forum that welcomes it I will email the legislators. Thanks for the tip.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join