It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by windword
I honestly can't wrap my mind around you're thinking that the Bible is more significant than the Vedas, unless you are just unaware of their vast content, and implications.
It doesn't justify a version of "God" any more than any other sacred text.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by DeadSeraph
Not unlike the Bible!
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Murgatroid
That's not true. The Bible misses the prophecy mark over and over again.
Originally posted by windword
That's not true. The Bible misses the prophecy mark over and over again.
"There are 456 OLD TESTAMENT AND NEW TESTAMENT PROPHECIES about the Messiah that were fulfilled by the life of Jesus Christ. The Bible has many that were written thousands of years before Jesus was born! Precise, detailed prophecies such as; where He would be born (Micah 5:2), how He would be born, (Isaiah 7:14) how He would die (Psalm 34:20), etc. And history has PROVEN, without ANY doubt whatsoever, they were fulfilled EXACTLY as the Bible had prophesied, hundreds of years earlier!"
The chances of just 48 out of the 456 prophecies being fulfilled in one person are 1 in 10 to the 157 power.
That's — 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
"According to Emile Borel, once one goes past one chance in 10^50, the probabilities are so small that it is impossible to think that they will ever occur..." LINK
"...what's the likelihood of a person predicting today the exact city in which the birth of a future leader would take place, well into the 21st century? This is indeed what the prophet Micah did 700 years before the Messiah. Further, what is the likelihood of predicting the precise manner of death that a new, unknown religious leader would experience, a thousand years from now - a manner of death presently unknown, and to remain unknown for hundreds of years? Yet, this is what David did in 1000 B.C.
Again, what is the likelihood of predicting the specific date of the appearance of some great future leader, hundreds of years in advance? This is what Daniel did, 530 years before Christ. ...Indeed, it may be possible for someone to fake one or two of the Messianic prophecies, but it would be impossible for any one person to arrange and fulfill all of these prophecies." LINK
"Any man who rejects Christ as the Son of God is rejecting a fact, proved perhaps more absolutely than any other fact in the world. God so thoroughly vindicated Jesus Christ that even mathematicians and statisticians, who were without faith, had to acknowledge that it is scientifically impossible to deny that Jesus is the Christ."
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by DeadSeraph
What are you talking about? We have already agreed that the Bible contains an historical record of Jewish people. So what if their cities, like Sodom and Gomorrah, are found. It doesn't prove that God is the one who destroyed them. It's the historical value of the Biblical description of God that I question, not if cities existed or not.
Troy was thought to be a mythical city until archaeologists recently found it.
Why is Biblical accuracy so special? Why are the archaeological discoveries that verify Vedic scripture any less valid? How is their description of their God's any less profound?
7. “Babylon…shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make a fold there. But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there;…and satyrs shall dance there…and her time is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged.” - Isaiah 13:19-22, Jeremiah 50:39-40,
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by DeadSeraph
7. “Babylon…shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make a fold there. But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there;…and satyrs shall dance there…and her time is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged.” - Isaiah 13:19-22, Jeremiah 50:39-40,
Babylon was never destroyed like Sodom and Gomorrah, and was never rendered uninhabited and satyrs never danced there..
Want more? Take a look for yourself.
rationalwiki.org...
pay2cem.hubpages.com...
faithskeptic.50megs.com...
Originally posted by windword
Why is Biblical accuracy so special? Why are the archaeological discoveries that verify Vedic scripture any less valid?
"Perhaps the most compelling of evidences demonstrating that the Bible is the word of God is its unswerving ability to accurately predict future events, often in minute details. Specific prophesies are conspicuously absent from the 26 other religious books that claim to be scripture, including the Muslim's Koran, the Book of Mormon, the Hindu Vedas, and Buddhist writings. This in itself should be a major eye-opener to the honest skeptic. "
Accuracy Of Prophecy
Originally posted by windword
Babylon was never destroyed like Sodom and Gomorrah, and was never rendered uninhabited and satyrs never danced there..
It is a fact of history that Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon lay prostrate in utter ruins from the second to the twentieth centuries. Babylon without doubt sank. When prophecy teachers speak of the "rebuilding" of Babylon, that "Babylon will rise again," and "The Second Coming of Babylon" (the title of a recent book), their own words are an admission that the Babylon of Jeremiah's time did sink. But God added that after sinking, Babylon "shall not rise." Saddam Hussein did not change that (see Insight #113), nor will Antichrist change that. God has spoken.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Murgatroid
Or, perhaps the Bible is, and has been, used as a blueprint for mind control by the Illuminati!
Originally posted by windword
Or, perhaps the Bible is, and has been, used as a blueprint for mind control by the Illuminati!
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Murgatroid
Or, perhaps the Bible is, and has been, used as a blueprint for mind control by the Illuminati!
Yes that's it, windword. And who does the Illuminati worship? Lucifer? OH WAIT, SO GOD IS REALLY THE DEVIL AND.... wait... where are we going with this?
Basically, You just don't like things the way they are. You want them YOUR way, and if they aren't your way you POUT. Well, I don't give a # if you want a sucker.
The Bible has been revealed to contain historical fact whether you like it or not.
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Murgatroid
Or, perhaps the Bible is, and has been, used as a blueprint for mind control by the Illuminati!
Yes that's it, windword. And who does the Illuminati worship? Lucifer? OH WAIT, SO GOD IS REALLY THE DEVIL AND.... wait... where are we going with this?
Basically, You just don't like things the way they are. You want them YOUR way, and if they aren't your way you POUT. Well, I don't give a # if you want a sucker.
The Bible has been revealed to contain historical fact whether you like it or not.
Too bad that you missed my attempt at humorous sarcasm. I do, however believe that the "Church" engineered the New Testament and used the OT as a blue print.
Why so angry? And yes, for the 3rd time, the Bible does contain some historically accurate records of the Jewish People. It isn't ALL myth.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by r2d246
I have read the Bible from cover t cover, a few times. It doesn't scare me nor do I find profound truth coursing through it.