reply to post by jtap66
I got offended as soon as you compared my thought pattern to a "religious zealot", im sure any rational mind would.
And funny how you claim not to be offending me, and ending with "I don't expoect you to "get" what I'm saying
", i take that as another
And i think we should agree to disagree, and admitted there is an argument either way, however again you left out the money trail (follow the
Agreed that the "Official story" is more water tight than the 9/11 story, however water is still leaking (discrepensies in what the "officials"
claim, and what appears to be going on) and until im completely satisfied with the official explanations, then there is cause for suspicion for me.
Now what you misunderstand, is that entertaining an idea and believing it are two different things, now ill entertain the idea of Fema Camps, until im
satisfied that they don't exist, that does not mean that i believe that they psychically exist, however i think its highly plausible that they do.
There is a difference, i in no way or shape, carve anything into stone, as nothing is static and every thing is dynamic and constantly moving and
evolving, now if your beliefs cant do the same, then yes i agree, you start falling into thought patterns like a religious zealot, as you reject all
information that does not fit your model, and you start looking for confirmation bias.
So i root we should agree to disagree, as i think we have established that we both have fluid thought beliefs, however we are clearly not on the same
page, and this is after looking presumable at most of the same information, so i doubt this thread will change much.
On that note Namaste and no disrespect meant anywhere along the way