It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The plaintiff tried to show that Ronan and all priests are employees of the Vatican, which is therefore liable for their actions.
Mosman made a previous decision strictly on legal theory and determined that, if all the factual assertions made by the plaintiff's lawyers in the case were true and applicable, then the Vatican would indeed employ Ronan. But on Monday, Mosman said he looked at the facts in the case and didn't find an employer-employee relationship.
"It's a shame that, once again, top Catholic officials successfully exploit legal technicalities to keep clergy sex crimes and cover ups covered up," Clohessy said. "The truth is that the Vatican oversees the church worldwide, insisting on secrecy in child sex cases and stopping or delaying the defrocking of pedophile priests."
Mosman said that if he accepted the plaintiff's argument that the Vatican maintains absolute control over all priests, and is therefore their employer, then all Catholics everywhere could similarly be considered employees of the Holy See.
It's a shame that, once again, top Catholic officials successfully exploit legal technicalities to keep clergy sex crimes and cover ups covered up
The Church could have avoided all of these problems centuries ago...by allowing priests to be married.
Originally posted by WhisperingWinds
reply to post by DontTreadOnMe
The Church could have avoided all of these problems centuries ago...by allowing priests to be married.
really? Can you explain to why many married men prey on children for sex?..and I mean married men who are having sex on a continual basis with their partners.
edit on 20-8-2012 by WhisperingWinds because: (no reason given)edit on 20-8-2012 by WhisperingWinds because: (no reason given)
"Many" men? Would that be like a "whole bunch"? Perhaps you could be a little more vague?
LIsten, there are sicko's in every group. You probably shook hands with a couple today. But, inarguably, the molesting of children by clergy would be far improved were RCC priests allowed to marry.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
I guess I'd have to agree with others in saying that Marriage or the lack of it has nothing to do with being a pedophile. As far as I have read and understand this by studies, it's a pretty valid illness. I say 'pretty valid' because some actually do believe child rapers can be rehab'ed. I disagree personally...
If Marriage is remotely related though, then what does that do for likelihood for a divorced person or just a guy who can't find that special someone? I say we just make sure those who are accused are investigated and tried, if appropriate. Send them into the system like any other pervert....but they were perverts before they became priests. I don't buy that being a priest or single created that defect in them. Just my two cents..
edit on 21-8-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
Well, on this point...We really don't agree at all I'm afraid. You equate the rape of children to male prisoners finding sexual release in prison. Of course...those males you talk about in prison as somehow being an example to understand the child rapers.....would tear those perverts limb from limb and then beat them to death with the pieces they tore off them. Literally..and it's actually happened more than some would want to talk about at prisons around the nation.
You seem to be coming at this from a position of sexuality with children being a 'natural' (?) or at least predictable path of release for an otherwise healthy male human being that simply finds themselves with no OTHER outlet.
I come at this from the position of something being fundamentally defective and outright malfunctioning about the human brain that sees a child as a sexual object to take by force and rape. Priest or not? Doesn't matter... Sick is Sick is Sick...and this defines sickness at the most vile and base level.
So.... While you may see the monster of a baby/child raper being the product of circumstance, I see it as a pure failure of the physiology that makes us all tick and forms one man into an Einstein while another can barely tie their own shoelaces. The same differences, in my view, separate a healthy and normal human male from the two legged animals that would brutalize children in the worst imaginable way.
I don't think we'll ever see common ground on this issue, at any level. We're just starting from two positions TOO far apart and polar opposite in cause/effect.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
You seem to be coming at this from a position of sexuality with children being a 'natural' (?) or at least predictable path of release for an otherwise healthy male human being that simply finds themselves with no OTHER outlet.