 |
|
Topic started on 27-4-2003 @ 06:12 AM by deepwaters
|
external image
In 1929, a group of historians found an amazing map drawn on a gazelle skin. Research showed that it was a genuine document drawn in 1513 by Piri
Reis, a famous admiral of the Turkish fleet in the sixteenth century. His passion was cartography. His high rank within the Turkish navy allowed him
to have a privileged access to the Imperial Library of Constantinople. The Turkish admiral admits in a series of notes on the map that he compiled and
copied the data from a large number of source maps, some of which dated back to the fourth century BC or earlier.
The Piri Reis map shows the western coast of Africa, the eastern coast of South America, and the northern coast of Antarctica. The northern coastline
of Antarctica is perfectly detailed. The most puzzling however is not so much how Piri Reis managed to draw such an accurate map of the Antarctic
region 300 years before it was discovered, but that the map shows the coastline under the ice. Geological evidence confirms that the latest date Queen
Maud Land could have been charted in an ice-free state is 4000 BC.
Link 1
Link 2
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-4-2003 @ 08:20 AM by dragonrider
|
What I find interesting about the Piri Reis map is that it shows a submarine canyon which bisects Antarctica under the ice. We didnt know about this
until the 1950s, but the Germans found it in the 1930s (before they began surveying it with submarines), and presumably used it as an entrance point
for U Boats to thier bases.
Did the Nazis have a copy of this map? Or did they have copies of the original maps that Piri Reis copied?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-4-2003 @ 11:04 AM by deepwaters
|
Hitler was known to have collected many atrefacts in his rise to power (spear of destiny etc.) that would have enabled him to succeed in his quest for
world domination.
I wouldn't doubt that the Nazi party would have gone after this type of information to empower their quest.
[Edited on 27-4-2003 by deepwaters]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-4-2003 @ 11:11 AM by dragonrider
|
This is a very interesting subject that I have been looking into for some time.
The main points I have come across so far is that Rudolf Hess was a member of the Thule Society (oddly, I dont find evidence that Hitler was actually
a member, but could be wrong on that), and commanded at least one of the several German expeditions to Neu Schwabenland (Antarctica) int he 1930s.
Very little is known of what they were looking for or what they found during these expeditions, but they apparently expended consideral captial in
them.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2003 @ 07:20 AM by mad scientist
|
Originally posted by dragonrider
This is a very interesting subject that I have been looking into for some time.
The main points I have come across so far is that Rudolf Hess was a member of the Thule Society (oddly, I dont find evidence that Hitler was actually
a member, but could be wrong on that), and commanded at least one of the several German expeditions to Neu Schwabenland (Antarctica) int he 1930s.
Very little is known of what they were looking for or what they found during these expeditions, but they apparently expended consideral captial in
them. 
Have a look at this thread OPERATION HIGHJUMP
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2003 @ 12:29 AM by Estragon
|
We've had aspects of this numerous times here at ATs -most recently, as I recall, some geologicially-illiterate drivel about continents slipping
because of melting ice!
It would be useful to recall that "southern continents" are to be found on maps of classical antiquity: not because anyone had been there but
because it was felt that the earth really ought to be "balanced" so there had to be a southern land mass to match Eurasia, as it were.
There's a good little discussion of Piri Reis, Hapgood and so forth here:
www.violations.dabsol.co.uk...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2003 @ 12:32 AM by Estragon
|
It's also worth reminding ourselves that some parts of the map (easy find-able on the net) are glaringly wrong e.g. the Caribbean.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2003 @ 12:37 AM by FoxStriker
|
All good points. But the fact remains that the map could be much older because it was made from much older maps.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2003 @ 12:49 AM by Estragon
|
I quite agree, Fox-S: it is very intriguing, hence the popularity of the topic.
Incidentally, cyber-chums: all who like a good "fantasy/the unexplained" read would probably enjoy searching Neu Schwabenland and encountering
numerous tales of a secret Fourth Reich and a Nazi moonbase etc.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2003 @ 05:47 AM by Maddas
|
With the tens of thousand's of years that humans have lived on this planet, migrating, forming new cilivalisation's and so on. It has, and is quite
accepatable to have the ignorant conception that these continents where not known about or discovered, until Western explorers staked their claim for
the history books. Just because conventional history dictate's one point of view, we can not dismiss the massive amount of other information for the
other.
Graham Handcock, Author of Fingerprints of The Gods has had many studies of this map done. His theories may be subjective but the information
gathered by him is very objective .
I've posted his website here, but since this is ATS, I expect most of you would have all ready been here.
www.grahamhandcock.com...
You could also go to my Thread -New Zealand History-A Radical point of view-. There are some more theories concerning the map within the web site.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2003 @ 08:00 AM by Nans DESMICHELS
|
done at the period of Plato, and that it's a map to the Atlantides.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-5-2003 @ 07:14 AM by Maddas
|
I've read about all the theories of this map; chartographed by aliens, civilisations existing before the pharaohs and more.
But recently Ive read that the previous maps that this one was drawn from, most likely came from the 1421-23 exploration of the Chinese Treasure
Junks. Cheak out this site or get a copy of Gavin Menzies, 1421 The Year China Discovered The World.
www.1421.tv...
By far, this is the most belivable theory.
Estragon really qouting Ptolemy would be the most unintelligent thing I've seen you do. Simalar is the earth-crust displacement theory you were
trying to diss.
For anyone interested in this map and others predating western voyages of exploration, I do believe that this will answer your questions. But, no
doubt it will be an anti-climax, or to say the least a let-down for many who tended towards the "far-out" lines of theory.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-5-2003 @ 09:14 AM by Estragon
|
Oh, dear. I fancy you'll find that among the English-speaking inhabitants of Planet Sane "quoting" tends to imply a repetition of an original word
or two. Did I even mention Ptolemy?
"Allude" might be the word for which you are struggling. It's under "A" very near the front of the dictionary.
And the idea started 4 centuries before with Aistotle. The point is that, because it ( Terra Australis Incognita, or Aristotle's "antarctica"
-i.e. the opposite of the Arctic, "the bear" -as in constellation) seemed logical, it was present on maps for a millennium and a half, and nothing
whatsoever about any voyages can safely be inferred from this.
Read the archives for the ice-pressure drivel.
"A little learning is a dangerous thing", the poet Pope assuerd us.
We can now see that no learning whatsoever is merely a ridiculous thing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |