It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by jimmyx
you can't "murder" a part of your own body...geez, please try and use comparisions that make sense.
A person is not a part of another person. They are independent in soul and body. The mother is host - she feeds/nurtures the individual baby - the separate person - by means of the umbilical cord.edit on 20-8-2012 by de_Genova because: error
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by jimmyx
Exactly. No one is making laws based on Biden's chains, Obama's 57-states or Palin's many gaffes. It's an entirely different thing to suggest that women who get raped can somehow WILL themselves not to get pregnant IN ORDER TO make laws against a woman's right to her own medical care and reproductive choices.
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by jimmyx
you can't "murder" a part of your own body...geez, please try and use comparisions that make sense.
A person is not a part of another person. They are independent in soul and body. The mother is host - she feeds/nurtures the individual baby - the separate person - by means of the umbilical cord.edit on 20-8-2012 by de_Genova because: error
THANK YOU! You are exactly right my friend. ^ Get educated...
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by jimmyx
My mom and your mom was pregnant. I know for damn sure I wasn't part of "HER" body. IT WAS MY BODY. Just because it is inside her doesn't mean it belongs to her. You people will learn that once you get that huge chip off your shoulders.edit on 20-8-2012 by Evanzsayz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by Lannister
No, not irrational. Just of a different opinion from you, apparently. What gives me the high moral ground here is that I respect your right to your opinion... what I get in return is categorized.
~Heff
Originally posted by Daughter2
The scary thing about this is I bet he really could dig up one or two doctors who could come up with some type of "scientific" proof. It's really easy to do.
Almost any type of study could prove anything with a little selective sampling and biased questions/theory.
This is why liberals need to be very careful with using "scientific" studies to further their cause. The only reason why left/liberal studies are being used is because you have judges willing to use these studies. The tables can get turned very quickly.
Originally posted by de_Genova
A person is not a part of another person. They are independent in soul and body. The mother is host - she feeds/nurtures the individual baby - the separate person - by means of the umbilical cord.edit on 20-8-2012 by de_Genova because: error
reply to post by neformore
victims of “legitimate rape” have unnamed biological defenses that prevent pregnancy
Research published in the Journal of American Obstetrics and Gynecology suggests over 30,000 pregnancies result from rape annually. “Rape-related pregnancy occurs with significant frequency,” the trio of researchers from the University of South Carolina concluded. “It is a cause of many unwanted pregnancies.” A separate 2001 study – which used a sample of 405 rape victims between ages 12 and 45 – found that 6.4 percent became pregnant.
Originally posted by neformore
Read this from a link off my Twitter feed and it left me speechless.
Rep. Todd Akin, the Republican nominee for Senate in Missouri who is running against Sen. Claire McCaskill, justified his opposition to abortion rights even in case of rape with a claim that victims of “legitimate rape” have unnamed biological defenses that prevent pregnancy.
“First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare,” Akin told KTVI-TV in an interview posted Sunday. “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
2012.talkingpointsmemo.com...
It scares me - as an outsider - that someone with this viewpoint could potentially get into the US senate and actually start to look at influencing legislation around this kind of issue.
Are people/politicians in the 'states really so naive to actually believe this? In fact - how on earth did this man get to be a politician in the first place?
Originally posted by Lannister
If a man murders a pregnant woman he would be charged with 2 counts of murder. Yet if that same woman aborted that same child that same day it's called family planning. Only in the twilight zone. But sure, make sure a woman never has to be responsible for a child that she doesn't want, but make sure you throw a man in prison for 18 years and destroy his entire life for missing a single child support payment.
Todd Akin apparently believes the body can suppress conception or cause miscarriage after rape. Historically, it was widely thought a woman could only conceive if she had an orgasm.
Originally posted by Heresy
reply to post by neformore
victims of “legitimate rape” have unnamed biological defenses that prevent pregnancy
Apparently he apologised later, kind of.
"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year," Akin said in a statement. He promised rape victims "will have no stronger advocate in the Senate to help ensure they have the justice they deserve" if he is elected.
Originally posted by Long Lance
Really ain't news, is it?
people have dedicated websites to this particular issue....
Republicans for Rape
People who call the guy out on stupidity are way off, imho, they are simply violent predators at heart who wish to legalize their desires and probably believe that rape is more in tune with their Darwinistic right-is-might mindset than voluntary intercourse (and conception, which implies Eugenics - something they probably love too but haven't yet found the time saying - yet)
It's high time to see such statements as what they are: a simple, very clear warning, just act on it whenever you can, but don't expect much in the way of support, a sizable portion of society admires that ideology and cannot be reasoned with in the conventional sense. Failure at this game of theirs leads to poverty, slavery and death. I'll leave it to everyone to figure out, which phase we're currently dealing with.
So, you can't fix stupid and you can't convince sanctimony but one can definitely kill the fascists. right?edit on 2012.8.20 by Long Lance because: (no reason given)
Second, being a "victim" of rape is, at best, a minor inconvenience and can be acceptably swept under the rug.