Originally posted by neformore
Read this from a link off my Twitter feed and it left me speechless.
Rep. Todd Akin, the Republican nominee for Senate in Missouri who is running against Sen. Claire McCaskill, justified his opposition to abortion
rights even in case of rape with a claim that victims of “legitimate rape” have unnamed biological defenses that prevent pregnancy.
“First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare,” Akin told KTVI-TV in an interview posted Sunday. “If
it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
It scares me - as an outsider - that someone with this viewpoint could potentially get into the US senate and actually start to look at influencing
legislation around this kind of issue.
Are people/politicians in the 'states really so naive to actually believe this? In fact - how on earth did this man get to be a politician in the
Because Traditionalist women voted him into office. Both political parties represent the interests of only their wealthy backers and women. Granted
Democrats tend to advocate on behalf of Feminist Women and Republicans Traditionalist Women, but it is fairly obvious that neither political party
represents the interests of men at all, because the general concerns that politicians use to get men to vote for them should be everyone's concern.
The reason why that idiots BS fly's, is because some Republican men are whipped little white knights who do everything their traditionalist
wife/mother figure tell them to; or because they, like me, only vote Republican because Republican's don't give a &&^% about men one way or another
while the Democrats go out of their way to persecute, discriminate, disenfranchise boy's, young men and men.
Maybe in another life I would care, but when an a male is raped by a female in our society, the so called egalitarian's thinks it is so funny. Me
personally I find this funny. I find everyone running around like a decapitated chicken to be hilarious. The gender war has never been about men and
women. It has always been a war between women.
Like I have said many times, and many times the feminist element here and their supporters ignore me because they don't care for the truth(which is
why the cause of leftist women is doomed), start at the beginning. Look up Mothers of the Republic. The Women's Rights Movement that fought for the
right to be SAHM's.
I guess if truth about "women's oppression" was ever known, feminist's and other new age lefties wouldn't be able to shame men in
subjugation anymore. But what can I say, as a child of the "girl power", boy's are stupid throw rocks at them 90's, this is highly amusing in a
morbid kind of way.
The term I use to describe what the traditionalist have done as a response to the 70's is called "The Traditionalist Noose".
The end goal was to make men either a) angry at women/ feminist's or b) apathetic towards the plight of women. The traditionalist's will keep up the
offensive, and they will actually be increasing it. The reason why things are happening so fast now is because the traditionalists know they only have
a small window to crush leftist women before they themselves would be destroyed by the same mechanisms they are using to get men out of the way.