How Many Civilians Does the U.S. Have to Kill Before It's Gulity of Genocide?

If America was practicing genocide, all the Atheists and the homosexuals and the non-believers would go first. Then all the people who aren't all white conservative Christians.

reply to post by learnatic


A related question:

How many nations who have little hope of ever being anything other than a hell hole does the US have to prop up only to have it further cascade in to misery? Egypt, Afganistan, looks like Syria next, who knows what the hell the US is doing in Africa, but we're most definately engaged. North Korea will get $billions in US aid when that regime tips over.

Does anyone in their right mind actually believe that Afganistan will ever be anything but a stone-age hell hole?

In our international interventions, we've merely been tossing out Hitlers and installing Stalins only to be surprised that Stalin is not much different than Hitler.

It is none of our business and they should be left alone or dealt with regional organizations like the Arab League and the African National Congress. We should not give any of them a dime, a drone, advice, intelligence, nothing.

I think Obama is an absolute disaster, yet had he immediately withdrawn from all of these absurd international interventions immediately, he would have my vote today. Yet, all he's done is doubled down on the idiotic, neocon Bush policies.

Obama is a serious, practicing neocon and that is a real disappointment. He had the mandate coming in, he had the honeymoon of being a new president with much affection afforded him by the public and he blew it.

Internationally, how is Obama any different than Dick Cheney, John Bolton, John McCain or any off the other neocons? In terms of actions he's exactly the same.

Originally posted by learnatic

Originally posted by JBRiddle
People die in war. Wars are no longer fought on some distance battlefield where only the two opposing forces get killed. Wars are fought in Urban Areas that are usually highly populated. The United States Military avoids civilian casualties when ever possible, but sometimes people are in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The Military's Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan are total retarded simply because we try too hard to avoid civilian casualties. For example, US forces are taking fire from a house across the Valley. In the old days we'd call in Artillery or an Airstrike and blow the building and all in it to kingdom come and let God sort'em out. But that's not the way we do it today, you are only allowed to shoot when we see enemies with weapons in there hands.

So back to the building that were being shot form. A few minutes later out walk 3 guys with no weapons. Are these the people shooting at us? (expletive deleted) YES! Can we shoot them? (expletive deleted) no. Why? Because of out stupid rules of engagement.

Americans are dying because of these stupid rules and it only encourages the enemy to exploit these rules knowing our hands are tied.

Yes mistake happen but we never directly target civilians like some other countries do.

I respect your comments because it seems you have been in the miltiary and know of the complications that arise but your claim does not seem to be supported by Wikileacks video from Iraiq for eample. If its just a case of mistakes happen when the U.S kills civilians then why is also not this same case when its the Lybians or the Syrians do it?

I see Hilary Clintion and other world leaders incuding those of my own goverment and that of Israel scream genocide when 100 bodies are found in Syria.

In any event, I'd still like to know; how many civilians does the U.S need to kill before its gulity of genocide according to its own definition of the term???

The Wikileacks video you refer to was heavily edited, if you see the whole video you can't come to the same conclusion.

i'd say around the time when the united states falls out of favor with the bank cartel/rothschild family. not anytime before that unfortunately. money controls the world and they have the money so even genocide in "excusable".

Originally posted by learnatic

Originally posted by JBRiddle

The United States is not deliberately or systematically targeting, in whole or in part, any ethnic, racial or religious groups or any one nationality.

(no reason given)