It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Thank you.

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

Help ATS via PayPal:

# Information Energy changing within an unchanging Space where (Gravity+Mass=Time) in space

page: 1
0
share:

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 12:19 AM
Empty space or filled space cannot be warp or bent only the occupant of a space may bend and warp
Never space itself
space holds constantly changing forms of energy flowing outwardly from within bending and warping itself as it progresses through the stages of life being structured of positive, negative and neutral parts
like a blank piece of paper which one can draw on and make a picture or a blank hard drive of a computer
Both a storage devises for information
Back to the paper which for this thought will represent energy
since all you have is this one blank white paper plus it's inverse black side (all particles have anti particle) like the bizarro world of atomic structure

imagine that this papar is nearly infinite taking up as much space as conceivable in two polarly opposing ways giving us [0,1,0] since the one pull itself into the zeros that have nearly identical composure except that each will always be opposing the other as -anti+

which begets the creation of [-1,0,1]
Now (and this is where I believe the big bang began) the whole of space was filled with 1 and -1 only the place between the outer 1 and opposing outer -1 was empty
Causing the universe to begin its beginning after being begotten from its former ends conception
To race towards its own eventual end at the common center of the opposing ones so (+1>]0[

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 01:45 AM

Your initial assumption is way off base. Gravity +mass=time is flat out wrong at the base level. As it has been known for almost 100 years that gravity is a side effect of mass. Meaning mass X = gravity gradient X in an exact equivelancy.

There is no difference between gravity and mass, so it is impossible to add gravvity to mass. Time is linked to both gravity and mass, as is evident in the fact that in the presence of mass X or gravity gradient X slows time relevant to the observers distance to the source of mass or the gravity well as it is most commonly used description.

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 01:55 AM

Also, forgot to mention this in my first reponse. It has been not only theorized but proven through almost 100 years of scrutiny that Einstein proved space and time themselves are warped by mass( gravity). It is widly known and observable by anyone with simple observation. Space warps in the presence of gravity(mass) by an exact measured amount, also time is also warper by the presense of mass(gravity).

Just one easy example, satelites don't havve clocks that function at the same rate as clocks on earth. We know this to be true and use the warping of sapce and time to our advantage, google" how does GPS work"

E=MC2. Look it up! Then get back to us after you learn basic physics, this is a kindergarten level misunderstanding.

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 07:59 PM

Originally posted by inverslyproportional

Also, forgot to mention this in my first reponse. It has been not only theorized but proven through almost 100 years of scrutiny that Einstein proved space and time themselves are warped by mass( gravity). It is widly known and observable by anyone with simple observation. Space warps in the presence of gravity(mass) by an exact measured amount, also time is also warper by the presense of mass(gravity).

Just one easy example, satelites don't havve clocks that function at the same rate as clocks on earth. We know this to be true and use the warping of sapce and time to our advantage, google" how does GPS work"

E=MC2. Look it up! Then get back to us after you learn basic physics, this is a kindergarten level misunderstanding.

Space can never get truly bigger or smaller since it is infinite
energy warps and bends as it flows thru space
The reason clocks further from the surface or center don't function the same is that time moves faster at the surface

As a object of low mass moves away from the center of a body of a object with large mass
Traveling from the surface where time and gravity hold and flow constantly around a spherical object
The same object put in orbit around the large mass object where its gravity has limited effect upon the orbiting object whose clock is a fraction behind the surface clock
because time at the surface moves faster then all points above it

This makes it only appear like time further above is going slower
Point in case is the pioneer anomaly which is described as the unexplained deceleration of the craft as it leaves the solar system
The pioneer craft in reality only appears to slow down because we move faster on earth then off it
as you move off the planet and away you are slowing your relative passage of time compared to the surface which passes more quickly

The sun having large enough mass to allow for fusion to take place moves faster then here jupiter or mars
After producing iron at its core a star goes super-nova and if large enough collapses into itself forming a blackhole a place where time moves so fast that it have gone beyond our sight since even light produced by it can never move faster to escape its surface which is traveling inwardly down like a drain at a time scale faster then light

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 09:29 PM
As most people should realize, Dinosaurs would never have been able to live in the current earth. Simple laws of physics puts up a delimiter for that.

But what if the earth itself was bigger meaning that the everything on it was of larger sizes as well if compared to the present earth scale
but as the size of the earth at the time of a fossils preservation would slowly decrease more so in living organic matter which over the grenrations of living things adapted with small things continuing on and larger creatures going extinct leaving only fossilsed remains within stone that captured their size when they where in the far off past

Over time the earth or the atoms that comprise the earth became smaller with rock being frozen into a state while moltin rock decreased in size and volume over time then it previously had been meaning everything living on earth could no longer be as large as before causing earthquakes and eruption as the crust slowly collapses to fill the space simotaniously pushing up other to form mountains
Killing off creatures to large to continue to in habit a world that over thousands and millions of year decreased in size to survive

This would leave behind only fossilized remains of what sizes those living things where at the time of their demise
Being turn into stone preserving them in a substance that takes the longest to atomically lose size over time

This explains the various sizes of large plants animals and insects that are found today

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 09:33 PM

Originally posted by IblisLucifer
As most people should realize, Dinosaurs would never have been able to live in the current earth. Simple laws of physics puts up a delimiter for that.
< snip >

You're forgetting an important data there.

The O2 and CO2 saturation of the atmosphere was higher at those days, thus allowing animals and plants to grow in a very different size.
edit on 19-8-2012 by PlanetaryStorm because: corrected typo

posted on Aug, 20 2012 @ 12:17 AM

Originally posted by PlanetaryStorm

Originally posted by IblisLucifer
As most people should realize, Dinosaurs would never have been able to live in the current earth. Simple laws of physics puts up a delimiter for that.
< snip >

You're forgetting an important data there.

The O2 and CO2 saturation of the atmosphere was higher at those days, thus allowing animals and plants to grow in a very different size.
edit on 19-8-2012 by PlanetaryStorm because: corrected typo

How should that matter in regards to living things. I fail to grasp why O2 and CO2 saturation could make such a thing possible.
Why does O2 and CO2 saturation effect the limits of carbon life forms in regards to size.
Even with such saturation would that cause a drop in atmospheric pressure great enough for such mammoth animals to exist.
Gravity still should allow for such growth if the present size of earth hadnt changed.
Relativity of time and the relativity of dimensions of all bound mass in composite that change over time depently as well as independently within the common point of existences

posted on Aug, 20 2012 @ 02:41 AM
The way I have recently understood it is as such:

Gravity=Mass=Attractive and/or repulsive force of all particles and fields.

I see it as the basic operating system of the others, the others being electromagnetism (duality), and the complexities of electromagnetic interaction (Attraction and repulsion) with electrons and atomic nuclei.

By this logic:

Gravity=Electromagnetism
Gravity=Mass (Atomics)
Therefore:
Mass=Massless

So the point maybe isn't the product of total mass and density. More like, total particulate count x density.

Of course, I could very well wake up tomorrow completely disagreeing with....'myself'.

As for time, I think time is just the description of reference points within an infinite void, whether the reference points are literally two distinct points in space, or the measured progress of any system in terms of duration.

Time = Duration = Distance = Space
edit on 20-8-2012 by Soloro because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 20 2012 @ 05:20 AM

Originally posted by Soloro
The way I have recently understood it is as such:

Gravity=Mass=Attractive and/or repulsive force of all particles and fields.

I see it as the basic operating system of the others, the others being electromagnetism (duality), and the complexities of electromagnetic interaction (Attraction and repulsion) with electrons and atomic nuclei.

By this logic:

Gravity=Electromagnetism
Gravity=Mass (Atomics)
Therefore:
Mass=Massless

So the point maybe isn't the product of total mass and density. More like, total particulate count x density.

Of course, I could very well wake up tomorrow completely disagreeing with....'myself'.

As for time, I think time is just the description of reference points within an infinite void, whether the reference points are literally two distinct points in space, or the measured progress of any system in terms of duration.

Time = Duration = Distance = Space
edit on 20-8-2012 by Soloro because: (no reason given)

When you look at an electron
See it as the force which holds reality together
When an electron jumps up a level it emits a photon
When moving down a level they obsorb one

this Change of Charge in the electron
turns it into a positron causing
A positron to become an electron at different level up or down
Because of the interaction photons have with these positron-electron (electro-magnetic) particle medium
Which gives a rhythm to matter.

posted on Aug, 20 2012 @ 06:47 AM

Originally posted by IblisLucifer
When you look at an electron
See it as the force which holds reality together
When an electron jumps up a level it emits a photon
When moving down a level they obsorb one
this Change of Charge in the electron
turns it into a positron causing
A positron to become an electron at different level up or down
Because of the interaction photons have with these positron-electron (electro-magnetic) particle medium
Which gives a rhythm to matter.

U have absolutely NO clue what you're talking about.

Electron jumping an orbital results in absorption, and coming back to its original orbital is emission. You have those two interchanged.

The electron never changes its charge during orbital translation.. huh?

Rhythm to matter? Lmfao.

Positrons are Beta + particles given off through radiation they don't happen during electron excitations.

new topics

top topics

0