It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Then please explain what "truth" you are after. I am all ears.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
I think that you are referring to "Illuminati", but point taken.
Again... Do rhetorical questions require evidence?
But my question presupposed that sexual orientation is pliable, given some advanced knowledge of human psychology that we are not privy to.....
Oh is that what that was?
So the statement of it being a NWO agenda was supposed to trigger a light bulb eh?
Well then... it didn't
and if you would be so kind.... I will ask again. Can you show the evidence for me?
I was not sharp enough for the rhetorical question to do its work all on its own.
Predicated on the idea sexual orientation is primarily psychological to begin with.
The overwhelming majority of both heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual people say it's not.
So if it were primarily psychological it would stand to reason to be based in the subconscious and therefore since not cognitive not a choice.
So sure hypothetically the NWO is on a grand scale infiltrating our society with the means to adjust our children's subconscious to turn them gay.
Let's pretend that's true. Why?
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by otherpotato
Then please explain what "truth" you are after. I am all ears.
I was being General, not Specific.
I am after the prize of Truth, and this requires letting go of emotional biases, cognative biases, and memory biases.
Truth can be attained if one is brave enough to face the inherent fallacies of their own cognitive dissonance....
Like claiming to fight for your children, while simultaneously claiming that you would not stop someone from trying to change their sexual orientation.
Originally posted by r2d246
Truth is often stranger than fiction. Today it's sex ed. Tomorrow it's a Jr option class called "becoming a homo 101" where they practice and learn about their gay rights.edit on 20-8-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason given)
What's the point of arguing for truth for the sake of truth? What prize do you get?
A sad and lonely path to pursue. (And believe me I have pursued it).
Truth in and of itself is nothing.
But feel free to sleep with it tonight.
If you avoid questions don't ask questions. It's rude and not conducive to discussion.
What if it is a NWO agenda to turn people gay?
And like.... the homosexuals aren't even aware of it?
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Were you going to answer that one? or just continue to look for ways to attack me for even asking it?
What if it is a NWO agenda to turn people gay?
And like.... the homosexuals aren't even aware of it?
I think most people would agree that our kids should be chasing butterflies, not having complex sexual issues thrust at them through the media.....
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
Yes, I agree...the reference in the specific movie she shared was pretty lighthearted, a twist the boy was gay, just odd in a kids movie I think.
I have definately made the leap to a more sinister agenda...
I have given some examples...the "Family Guy" cartoon for one.....what do you think of this cartoon, have you ever seen it?
Mostly I guess I am in favor of loving, thoughtful, romantic, mind blowing, soul melting sexuality.....lmao...yeah, yeah, I know.....silly.......corny....
just think it sucks that sex is a commodity...and it totally bothers me when it's marketed to kids
Anyways, I'm wierd I guess, intellectually I "get it" but at the core of my being something feels very wrong......
Originally posted by mAnnee
Originally posted by chr0naut
As I previously stated, I was, at one stage aggressively pursued by a homosexual, who would not take no for an answer.
I'm a woman. LOL
It really cracks me up when a man is put in this position.
I had to extremely strenuously reject their constant physical advances and threaten them with the law to stop them. I eventually chose to quit my employment to escape from their sexual harassment. This cost me in both personal and financial terms.
Repeat. I'm a woman. LOL
It really cracks me up when a man is put in this position.
The person in question had previously been married with children but had chosen to make a mid-life change.
NO - - he did not choose to make a mid-life change. He chose to accept and recognize his birth right.
Something he would never had to do if self-righteous society - - - hadn't forced him into living a lie.
edit on 19-8-2012 by mAnnee because: DAMN QUOTES!