Thanks for the response. I'm not sure what the Eric Dittleman video was intended to prove or disprove. It was enertaining however.
Eric Dittleman is not a mind reader I can assure you, just he knows how to mentally suggest to someone what he wants them to do.
I didn't catch where he suggested what they should draw as could be done with a NLP script or targeted suggestions. I don't recall hearing about this guy before so I can't really comment further on him. I'd like to see more of his work but my wife is tired of talking to the back of my head while I'm on the computer and she's worked up a list of things for me to go do.
I'm not one to not take interest in my own motivations and reasons for my behavior.I like to be a student of myself. All I can say is, I feel anger when I empathetically place myself into his brain. I feel his cockiness, his arrogance, his indifference to others. Basically, he's disingenuous. Let me go as far to say, I'm empathetically telepathic. I have a good sense of other's people's intentions and I don't like him. He has some good messages, but I don't like him because I sense his corruption.
It's good to observe our reactions and I commend you for the efforts, however what you have stated regarding empathy can not be scientifically measured.
1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
2. the imaginative ascribing to an object, as a natural object or work of art, feelings or attitudes present in oneself:
This is your interepretation of him based on your exposure to him, filtered through your emotional body. We all have varous interpretaions of what we experience colored through the framework of our past. Some people don't like to eat vegatables, some dislike fried chicken, etc., but how does that validate your viewpoint in how it relates to others? Is his perceived corruption measured by his cocky behaviour because he operates outside of the normal bandwith of expression that 'normal' people use? I call it confidece.
Personally I find lady gaga corrupt but I'm not going to expend energy trying to get people to stop watching her.
I was only able to watch a bit on the interview but what I found at those timeframes you mentioned was interesting and worth furthering the discussion.
Around the 22:46, he mentions receiving telepathic downloads, which sometimes take 3 hours to write out and further comprehend. It's like a zip file or packet of information. In the books by Robert Monroe he describes something similar in function called a ROTE: Related Organized Thought Energy.
For the 9:46 mark he mentions telepathic connection, in which he connects to this higher aspect. It's a link or consiousness stream connection. It's not like receiving an email that you read. His brain does need to understand the question to better access the information relating to it. You could show me chinese letters but I wouldn't know what to think of them unless I had an idea behind their meaning.