It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The James Holmes Conspiracy (2012 Full Documentary)

page: 11
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in


posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:07 PM
heres the press conference

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:35 PM
reply to post by rainbowbear

So some group has tried profiting from this awful thing. Motive for it happening at all? I wouldn't put it past some people. Are these guy still accountable for..''unknown board''. Isn't this illegal in the US?

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:41 PM
I don't know how to take the families crying about donations and that's it? They must have other questions as to what is going on????'s all about the money? Werid and a little creepy.

I would go after them too...but I would also go after all the crap...I would want the truth...u would have to be blind not to see something more happened here....but onoooooo where's our money?

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:41 PM
reply to post by theabsolutetruth

great advertizement for the movie.

people donating to a bad company is the peoples fault IMO

fool me once-- and so on

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:46 PM
I'll reveal a secret to this....

In the end James will end up in the witness protection program. They might do fake execution like they did with Timothy McVay, and then put him into the WPP the same way they did with Tim. So at least thats' a good thing. They're likely not gonna just kill him. If he's an operative patsy they might let him live. But they'll tell everyone and show off this fake execution to make it look like he was done away with. Again it happened with Tim McV and same thing with him. They're both very similar crimes in nature. Both G--v staged psy-ops.

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:49 PM
it comes down to people being SO mind-f ed and going thru scientifically created psy-op, that the people have been SO stripped of their critical thinking and reason that makes them so easily manipulated--and the actual problem goes unnoticed.

this video should be proof of the problem for any rationally thinking human.

its the point of this theater shooting in a nutshell.

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:53 PM
reply to post by rainbowbear

Sure has thrown in a few more spanners to the whole thing.

And added weight to any conspiracies. These people should be asking way more questions about this incident. There are just too many anomalies, it doesn't add.

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 03:55 PM
reply to post by theabsolutetruth

ya--they wont see a dime unless they dance to the tune

posted on Aug, 28 2012 @ 04:11 PM
Looks like this organisation is linked to a local Governors office. It also says it gives to the organisations rather than victims.

the organisation concerned

Aurora Victim Relief Fund at Community First Foundation Fund Balance and Distributions Chart Donate to the Aurora Victim Relief Fund Thank you for your concern for the victims of the Aurora, Colo., tragedy. In the days following this tragic event, Community First Foundation established the Aurora Victim Relief Fund in partnership with the office of Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper. About the Aurora Victim Relief Fund The Aurora Victim Relief Fund has been established in partnership with Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper at Community First Foundation. This fund is being used to address the immediate and long-term needs of victims and their families and, as funds are available, the broad needs of those affected in the community. The Fund does not make grants directly to individuals, but to nonprofit organizations offering assistance to those individuals.

posted on Aug, 30 2012 @ 06:08 AM

is this Allison Ernst a member here by any chance? lol

posted on Aug, 30 2012 @ 07:04 AM

Originally posted by rainbowbear
reply to post by theabsolutetruth

ya--they wont see a dime unless they dance to the tune

Right on so many levels.


posted on Aug, 30 2012 @ 11:44 PM

the Denver Post reported that Fenton testified Thursday that she stopped treating the suspected gunman on June 11 — just weeks before the shooting. However, just nine minutes before the shooting, Holmes called a University of Colorado switchboard. While it's unclear whether he was trying to reach Fenton, the switchboard can be used to contact faculty members during off hours, CNN reported Thursday. The debate about Holmes' relationship with Fenton, and when it ended, came to a head Thursday afternoon as prosecutors and the defense faced off about whether the state has access to a notebook Holmes allegedly sent Fenton. The notebook is said to contain graphic details about his plans to people. If the pair still had a doctor-patient relationship at the time Holmes reportedly sent the notebook, then it would be protected and off-limits to prosecutors. When asked by the defense whether she knew Holmes called the switched, Fenton replied "I don't know," the Post's John Ingold tweeted immediately after the hearing. Fenton testified Thursday that she contacted a campus police officer with concerns about a patient on June 11, the last day she treated Holmes. However, the defense stopped her from identifying Holmes as the patient. Read more:
< br />
The shrink -- was James Holmes in love? Trying to impress his shrink by being as psycho as possible?

O.K. there's been no mention if James Holmes had a girlfriend, etc. I saw one mention of him potentially having "drinking buddies."

Why was a Ph.D. neuroscience student being treated for psychosis? Isn't that a paradox? He should not have been capable of objectively studying the brain if his own brain is so unstable.

The Times reports that Holmes allegedly texted an acquaintance about a condition called dysphoric mania, a condition associated with bipolar disorder that seldom produces violence but can occasionally cause some patients to experience agitation and "paranoid delusions" -- after which he warned her to stay away because he was "bad news." Additionally, the paper cites an anonymous official as saying, "Nothing Mr. Holmes disclosed to Dr. Fenton rose to the threshold set by Colorado law to hospitalize someone involuntarily."

So Fenton and Holmes have this "privileged" secret relationship -- I'm thinking Holmes was probably jonesing. A neuroscientist "seeing" a shrink?

The documentary pointed out Fenton used to work for the V.A. but she also was an "acupuncturist."

in 2005 the Colorado medical board reprimanded Dr. Fenton for prescribing anti-anxiety medication to her employee and to herself. As well, she prescribed medication to her husband.

Yeah I'm thinking New Age drug-pushing wacked out military shrink

So Fention requests a criminal background check on Holmes in early June, then Holmes drops out of his Ph.D. program on June 10th. -- Did Holmes try to make his moves on Fenton? Then it failed so he did his massacre as a backup suicide lost love action

Mr. Holmes had been a shy, awkward boy who once seemed bound for big things. He was a science student from Southern California who won scholarships and internships, graduated “at the top of the top” from the University of California, Riverside, and moved to Colorado in 2011 to take the next step: a doctoral program in neuroscience. But Mr. Holmes struggled through his first academic year at the University of Colorado in Denver. Neighbors from his gang-ridden neighborhood in Aurora described him as a solitary figure, recognizable as one of the few white residents of a largely Hispanic neighborhood, and always alone. He appears to have sought companionship through the Web site Adult Friend Finder, posting a photo of himself with bright orange hair and saying that he was “looking for a fling.” In an online profile, he described himself as a nice guy, or as nice as any man “who does these sorts of shenanigans,” though its authenticity could not be independently verified.

So if this is true - then Fenton was Holmes only close female interaction and he was "looking for a fling" -- clearly he had pent up desire and he mailed his plans to Fenton to make an impression

posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 05:43 AM
edit on 31-8-2012 by SymbolicLogic because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 06:36 AM
reply to post by fulllotusqigong

I really don't think Fenton is as you described or that her relationship with Holmes was of a more intimate nature.

posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 07:12 AM
For those of you which can't view this video due to this:

This video contains content from Journal Broadcast Group, Associated Press (AP), Scripps Local News, mgm, Current TV LLC and Rightster, one or more of whom have blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

Here is the same documentary but split into four parts:

Unfortunately part 4 of the video has been removed or has not yet been uploaded. I'm going to watch the video once I have some spare time on my hands. I knew from the moment I saw the News Holmes was set up.

Continuing from CBS:

“He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were ‘something I’ve never seen.’ One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes’ car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting.”

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps… c’mon, this isn’t a “lone gunman.” This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, and then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

As I had mentioned in a previous thread, the only Agency I believe (at the moment) which could of had provided Holmes with this exotic gear was the FBI, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts:

Quick question.

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, “flammable” booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform, and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody’s guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices, and more, I’m guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.

Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?

His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of “killing everyone.”

Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance? It doesn’t add up.

“Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police said, adding he didn’t resist when he was arrested,” reports a local CBS news affiliate

posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 09:30 AM
reply to post by djr33222

Right but consider Holmes' perspective. Sexually repressed "shy" overly-academic neuroscience student and his only regular contact is an attractive female shrink. I'm sure Fenton's intentions were good but the situation was out of control for her. Holmes' background is an overly cerebral mad scientist family. So what does Holmes do? He projects all his repressed sex energy onto Fenton and of course it's "un-consummated."

That's the whole point -- they didn't have an "intimate" relationship which drove Holmes insane.

The more Fenton tried to label Holmes as insane the more his love was driven to a deeper level of unconsummated angst driving him to commit mass massacre as his final expression of his twisted repressed sex energy for Fenton.

As for how Holmes pulled it off -- he had a federal grant of $50,000 plus so he's got the money. He's got the brains to figure out any technical issues -- anybody can teach themselves anything especially if they have lots of alone time and lots of technical training.

edit on 31-8-2012 by fulllotusqigong because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 09:11 PM
Wonder why they are singling out this one shrink when it's been reported he seen 2 others but nothings come out about them.

I guess him trying to call her 9 minutes before shooting is to cover up the question about the phone call in the movie theater. Still seems a little odd- calling her after midnight right there in a full theater with other people watching the movie. and a couple of witnesses said he walked over and opened the door and he motioned or waved to someone. then he got dressed in all that gear within 9 minutes. unless this call that's being reported is not the same call made in the theater...
edit on 31-8-2012 by xerrnoip because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 09:20 PM
reply to post by xerrnoip

I don't think it is -- I don't think Holmes was sitting in the theater because people would have noticed his red hair, etc.

So the witnesses saying someone propped the door open for Holmes -- obviously that needs to be followed up by the cops but it appears they don't have enough evidence to follow up on it.

How would they follow up on it? The answer is that there would have to be a camera in the theater that allows seeing the faces of the audience. I don't think there are cameras inside movie theatres that document the faces of the people watching the movie. If there were that would be kind of creepy anyway.

So when was he seeing the two other shrinks? And also again why is no one questioning that a Neuroscience studnet is on psychotropics and seeing a shrink -- a Ph.D. neuroscientist! Hello? Shouldn't there be some academic standards applied like a conflict of interest. Umm my brain is all messed up by I can study other peoples' brains no problem! It's kind of obviously a problem I think.

posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 05:43 AM

Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by xerrnoip

I don't think it is -- I don't think Holmes was sitting in the theater because people would have noticed his red hair, etc.

Not if he was wearing a hat.

posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 06:22 AM
This was reportedly from a blog, unsure as to how valid it is

new topics

top topics

<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in