Muslim Brotherhood Starts Crucifixions. Is The U.S. Headed For Sharia Law?

reply to post by sheepslayer247


Blah blah blah. Their holy book says some bad stuff.....we got it.

I'm still waiting for the proof that shows the crucifixions. If you want to make the case that Muslims are bad by reading me their literature, top it off with pics of video of this crucifixion.

If your "logic" is so superior to mine, put the final nail in my coffin and provide proof. Otherwise, you are just shaking a tree that bares no fruit.

Ayatollah Khomeini thinks you are a witless, foolish soul and he wants to spit on you for thinking that Islam counsels against war and doesn't require able bodied Muslims to conquer so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. I feel that he is being unduly harsh.

You have just made the mistake of defending something you clearly don't understand.

I didn't defend anything. I said that one religion is no better than the other and I want to see some proof.

I think you made the mistake of wandering away from the hospital without your "happy pills". If you want to talk about logic....well....you have destroyed that.

Please respond with more quotes and irrelevant garbage that does nothing to address the issue at hand. I am sure more people would love to read your bastardized interpretation of another religion's holy book.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

Please respond with more quotes and irrelevant garbage that does nothing to address the issue at hand.

Quotes from the Koran and Hadith that prove that Muhammad told his followers to dominate by the sword and to enagage in jihad are irrelevant?

Your logic is very, very special.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
I am sure more people would love to read your bastardized interpretation of another religion's holy book.

Perhaps you can point out where my 'bastardized' interpretation is in error?

I am waiting...

You know next to nothing about Islam, as demonstrated by the pitiful level of knowledge you demonstrate in your posts - you lead zero evidence - merely endless politically correct platitudes, yet you defend what you clearly do not understand.

Maybe the Ayatollah Khomeini was right about you?

Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless.

Islam says, kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all!

...Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”

—Ayatollah Khomeini (1902-1989) Iran’s Supreme Leader from 1979 to 1989—the highest ranking political and religious authority of the nation.

Link

Muhammad made it clear -

Allah's Apostle said:

"I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle."

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, number 24

Hadith Muslim 20:4681

"The gates of Paradise are under the shadows of the swords."

Muhammad

Hadith Muslim

There's no need to converse with certain kinds of people because they'll continue to say the same things again and again. They are closed to anything that even risks changing their view of hatred for certain people. It's best to just say something very simple to these kinds of made-up stories:

Pics or it didn't happen.

reply to post by ollncasino

Quotes from the Koran and Hadith that prove that Muhammad told his followers to dominate by the sword and to enagage in jihad are irrelevant?

I don't see any prove of an Egyptian crucifixion in there. Therefore...it would be irrelevant.

Your logic is very, very special.

Why thank you! It always makes me feel good when someone's argument or style of discourse is so bad that they must turn to tactics of personal destruction.

You know next to nothing about Islam, as demonstrated by the pitiful level of knowledge you demonstrate in your posts - you lead zero evidence - merely endless politically correct platitudes, yet you defend what you clearly do not understand.

What do I need evidence for? I am not the one making any claim against Islam. The topic at hand is the crucifixions in Egypt, and I do not see how posting quotes from their holy book is evidence of that.

No platitudes. I want to see the proof. SHOW ME THE MONEY!

Just because I will not post quotes trying to demonize a religion that is not mine, does not mean I lack understanding of the ability to see fact.

Fact is.....no crucifixion.

Fact is.....you can't prove it DID happen.

Fact is.....you moved the attention away from the crucifixion to quotes of violence and such in the Muslim faith.

You are intentionally misdirecting the conversation, and then you try to say that I am somehow stupid because I refuse to follow your train wreck logic?

Ok.....but at least I am smart enough to know what the hell the original topic was.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

What do I need evidence for? I am not the one making any claim against Islam.

Yet you are a self styled defender Islam. Which is unfortunate for Islam as you know next to nothing about it.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
You are intentionally misdirecting the conversation, and then you try to say that I am somehow stupid because I refuse to follow your train wreck logic?

The level of violence that Christians have been subjected to in the last 20 months at the hands of Muslims is very relevant when considering the likelihood of Christians being crucified by Muslims.

• 2012.03.04 Egypt Abu Al-Reesh. Two nuns are injured when a Muslim mob of 1500 lays siege to a Catholic school on rumors of a church building.

• 2012.01.26 Egypt Bahgourah. A Christian father and son are machine-gunned by Muslims after refusing to pay money.

• 2012.01.19 Egypt Kebly-Rahmaniya. A man and boy suffer gunshot injuries when a mob rampages through a Christian town, shouting 'Allah Akbar' and burning homes.

• 2012.06.11 Egypt Cairo. Several Christian students are injured by Muslims angered over their evangelism.

• 2011.12.29 Egypt Assiut. At least five people are hurt when a Muslim mob burns Christian homes over a Facebook cartoon.

• 2011.11.30 Egypt Ghorayzat. Two Christian brothers are murdered in cold blood by a Muslim mob rampaging through Christian homes and businesses.

• 2011.11.17 Egypt Cairo. Islamic radicals violently attack a group of Copts, marching to a memorial for slain victims of another massacre.

• 2011.10.16 Egypt Mallawy. A Coptic high school student is beaten to death after refusing to take off his cross.

• 2011.10.09 Egypt Cairo. Military and Islamist gunmen massacre over two dozen Christians peacefully protesting a church burning. 27 killed. 327 injured.

• 2011.09.29 Egypt Tamia. A guard at a church is taken out by a Muslim drive-by.

• 2011.08.08 Egypt Minya. A Christian farmer has his throat slit in front of his son by a Muslim mob, who attack Christian homes and also severely beat a pastor.

• 2011.07.29 Egypt Minya. Two Christians are taken out by snipers while riding in a car.

• 2011.07.25 Egypt Samalout. A pregnant woman is among six Christians brutally assaulted with iron rods by a Muslim mob angered over a church bell.

• 2011.06.26 Egypt Awlad Khalaf. Three Christians are injured when a Muslim mob torches eight homes on a rumor that one was to become a church.

• 2011.05.19 Egypt Cairo. Three Catholics are severely injured by a rock-throwing Muslim mob intent on preventing a church from opening.

• 2011.05.15 Egypt Cairo. About fifty Christians are injured when a Muslim mob hurls rocks and homemade bombs into a peaceful protest.

• 2011.05.15 Egypt Cairo. Two Copts are gunned down in a Muslim drive-by attack.

• 2011.05.09 Egypt Cairo. A 60-year-old Catholic grandfather is beaten to death by enraged Muslims.

• 2011.05.08 Egypt Imbaba. Islamists break into a Catholic church and slit a member's throat.

• 2011.05.08 Egypt Imbaba. Salafists shoot the 16-year-old nephew of a Catholic bishop in the head.

• 2011.05.07 Egypt Cairo. Fundamentalists assault two churches with firebombs and gunfire, killing five Copt defenders and seven more in an ensuing rampage. 232 injured.

• 2011.04.18 Egypt Minya. One Copt is killed by Muslim rioters, who throw a grandmother out of a second story balcony while shouting praises to Allah. 11 injured.

• 2011.03.20 Egypt Qena. A Christian has his ear torn off by Muslims enforcing Sharia law.

• 2011.03.09 Egypt Cairo. Nine Copts, including a child, are killed and over a hundred more injured when a Muslim mob hurls firebombs and shoots into a group protesting a church burning.

• 2011.03.04 Egypt Sol. A Muslim mob, angry over a relationship between a Muslim girl and Christian boy, kills the two fathers and burns down a church.

• 2011.02.24 Egypt Wadi el-Natroun. Two monks are among nineteen injured when military forces storm a Coptic monastery with live ammunition.

• 2011.02.23 Egypt Assiut. A priest is brutally stabbed to death in his home by killers shouting 'Allah Akbar!'

• 2011.01.30 Egypt Sharona. Very young children are among eleven members of two Coptic families shot to death in their homes at point-blank range by Islamic radicals.

• 2011.01.11 Egypt Samalout. A policeman boards a train and opens fire on a group of elderly Christians while yelling 'Allah Akbar.' A 71-year-old victim dies on the scene.

• 2011.01.01 Egypt Alexandra. Twenty-three parishioners are incinerated by a Shahid suicide bomb attack on a New Year's Day church mass. 77 injured.

www.thereligionofpeace.com...

reply to post by ollncasino

Yet you are a self styled defender Islam.

What is a self-styled defender of Islam? I have no clue what that even means.

If you are trying to say that I am defending Islamic violence....you are wrong.

I just want to see evidence of a crucifixtion before I pass judgement. Is that so hard to understand?

The level of violence that Christians have been subjected to in the last 20 months at the hands of Muslims is very relevant when considering the likelihood of Christians being crucified by Muslims.

Key word here: Likelihood!

There's also a small likelihood that the monkeys from the Wizard of Oz may fly out of my backside whilst they whistle the tune from Smokey and the Bandit.

That does not mean it has actually happened.

So keep on doing what you are doing if that is the course you which to take. But I will remain impartial until such time that evidence is brought forth to prove whether or not this occurred.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by sheepslayer247

 

Blah blah blah. Their holy book says some bad stuff.....we got it.

I'm still waiting for the proof that shows the crucifixions. If you want to make the case that Muslims are bad by reading me their literature, top it off with pics of video of this crucifixion.

If your "logic" is so superior to mine, put the final nail in my coffin and provide proof. Otherwise, you are just shaking a tree that bares no fruit.

Ayatollah Khomeini thinks you are a witless, foolish soul and he wants to spit on you for thinking that Islam counsels against war and doesn't require able bodied Muslims to conquer so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. I feel that he is being unduly harsh.

You have just made the mistake of defending something you clearly don't understand.

I didn't defend anything. I said that one religion is no better than the other and I want to see some proof.

I think you made the mistake of wandering away from the hospital without your "happy pills". If you want to talk about logic....well....you have destroyed that.

Please respond with more quotes and irrelevant garbage that does nothing to address the issue at hand. I am sure more people would love to read your bastardized interpretation of another religion's holy book.

edit on 20-8-2012 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)

...not to mention the fact that this guy still doesn't really understand the texts or history of his OWN religion yet.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by ollncasino

 

Yet you are a self styled defender Islam.

What is a self-styled defender of Islam? I have no clue what that even means.

If you are trying to say that I am defending Islamic violence....you are wrong.

I just want to see evidence of a crucifixtion before I pass judgement. Is that so hard to understand?

The level of violence that Christians have been subjected to in the last 20 months at the hands of Muslims is very relevant when considering the likelihood of Christians being crucified by Muslims.

Key word here: Likelihood!

There's also a small likelihood that the monkeys from the Wizard of Oz may fly out of my backside whilst they whistle the tune from Smokey and the Bandit.

That does not mean it has actually happened.

So keep on doing what you are doing if that is the course you which to take. But I will remain impartial until such time that evidence is brought forth to prove whether or not this occurred.

But...that's crazy-talk!

I thought all us good ol' jesus-lovers and 'mericans were all about casting the first stone, declaring people guilty until proven innocent, endemic xenophobia, willful ignorance, and forming conclusions of law based upon the talking voices we hear in our head and/or our imaginary playmates with supernatural powers!

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

What do I need evidence for? I am not the one making any claim against Islam.

Yet you are a self styled defender Islam. Which is unfortunate for Islam as you know next to nothing about it.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
You are intentionally misdirecting the conversation, and then you try to say that I am somehow stupid because I refuse to follow your train wreck logic?

The level of violence that Christians have been subjected to in the last 20 months at the hands of Muslims is very relevant when considering the likelihood of Christians being crucified by Muslims.

www.thereligionofpeace.com...

Ummm...you are aware that obtaining the "evidence" you cited above from a website dedicated to anti-islamic agenda and which will only provide source for "individual incidents upon request only" isn't in any way academically, scientifically, or journalistically sound...correct?

It's like citing the KKK's "data" that people of African descent are inherently less intelligent that Nordic people's.

Sure...YOU provided a "source"...but your "source" isn't willing to openly provide the details of where they obtained their information.

You might very well have some good points...but it makes it hard to take you seriously with such shoddy researching abilities.

What is a self-styled defender of Islam? I have no clue what that even means.

I'm guessing that a "self-styled defender of Islam" is an individual who takes a pro-Islamic stance whilst simultaneously picking out all of their own clothes, footwear, and hairstyles.

reply to post by ollncasino


Here's what www.thereligionofpeace.com themselves say about their "sources"...

Link: www.thereligionofpeace.com...

"Keep in mind that only a single source is retained for each incident, even though multiple sources are often used to construct details at the time of entry. This means that the linked article may not include all of the properties of the attack, including accurate casualty figures or the identity of the victims or perpetrators. Where these exceptions occur, missing details can be gleaned from other sources.

Casualty figures often change over time as victims of Islamic terror succumb to their injuries. The retained source may or may not be updated to reflect this. On those occasions where we do decide to replace the source link, the new article may neglect other details of the attack included in our description. If you don't like this, then do your own homework."

So...what they are saying is:

"Look at all these really scary things that happened! Although we could be wrong and it could be the CHRISTIANS doing this to the Muslims, might not have really resulted in any injuries or deaths, and might not have gone down AT ALL like we reported....and if you don't like it...go somewhere else to obtain actual journalism other than the xenophobic rantings of lunatics that you will find here".

You should be ashamed for falling for this thinly-veiled and poorly constructed attempt at propaganda. Feel free to apologize to the thread and to humanity in general for posting such alarmist accounts of "attacks" which your own "source" says might be purely fictional and only has occurred in the imagination of the webmaster.

Originally posted by milominderbinder
reply to post by ollncasino

 

Here's what www.thereligionofpeace.com themselves say about their "sources"...

Link: www.thereligionofpeace.com...

"Keep in mind that only a single source is retained for each incident, even though multiple sources are often used to construct details at the time of entry. This means that the linked article may not include all of the properties of the attack, including accurate casualty figures or the identity of the victims or perpetrators. Where these exceptions occur, missing details can be gleaned from other sources.

Casualty figures often change over time as victims of Islamic terror succumb to their injuries. The retained source may or may not be updated to reflect this. On those occasions where we do decide to replace the source link, the new article may neglect other details of the attack included in our description. If you don't like this, then do your own homework."

So...what they are saying is:

"Look at all these really scary things that happened! Although we could be wrong and it could be the CHRISTIANS doing this to the Muslims, might not have really resulted in any injuries or deaths, and might not have gone down AT ALL like we reported....and if you don't like it...go somewhere else to obtain actual journalism other than the xenophobic rantings of lunatics that you will find here".

You should be ashamed for falling for this thinly-veiled and poorly constructed attempt at propaganda. Feel free to apologize to the thread and to humanity in general for posting such alarmist accounts of "attacks" which your own "source" says might be purely fictional and only has occurred in the imagination of the webmaster.

Oh...and www.thereligionofpeace.com absolutely refuses bulk requests for verification of their "sources" because they don't want to "give their work away for free".

So...they aren't even willing to provide the documentation that any high school student or college undergrad normally provides "for free" in their academic works...even when they claim all of these people are dying at the hands Muslims".

How very "christian" of them.

Somebody should tell them that if they ACTUALLY provided adequate documentation of their "sources" they could probably pretty easily make 7 or 8 figures a year giving speeches to religiously-fueled special interest groups who have an economic interest in panic and fear. Then they wouldn't have to "do it for free".

Good excuse for the cognitively impaired, though. I'm sure they can hoodwink 99:100 people in the lower quartile of the Stanford-Binet.

Look, I don't know if the Egyptian crucifixions took place or not. Neither do you.

You're right. So why are we not addressing that issue first and foremost. That is the topic of the thread.

Is this really about truth...or is this about pushing an agenda so that weak-willed pansies get all scared because them scary Islamacists may come get them?

You know...I love it when you get a BLATANT admission from someone that they have absolutely no idea if the event they are so horrified about and worked up over EVER HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE...and yet for some continue to debate the point as though this alleged event is an absolute fact of record.

Originally posted by milominderbinder

I should clarify my point, when I refer to pagan "Sun worship" I was not referring to all of Christianity, but to the Roman Catholicism and her many "daughter" churches that still worship God on "Sun"day. Not all of Christianity can be represented by The Roman Catholicism as there are some Christians who do not go to church on Sunday (but on Saturday as Jesus and his followers did) and do not recognize the Pope or any Catholic Priest as their "spiritual father" (Jesus forbade his followers to be called rabbi / teacher, and for them to any call any other man their "father," or "Master"( Matthew 23 1-12).

As for the whole Horus and Jesus comparison, you once you understand that Roman Catholicism is not True Bible-based Christianity and Roman Catholicism is ancient "Sun" Worship, you will then understand that Roman Catholicism uses the Real Jesus Christ of Nazareth as their new front man for their revived Ancient Pagan Sun Worship in order to welcome the coming of the Anti-Christ aka Satan aka Lucifer aka Sananda aka Cosmic Christ. Some of the symbols of Islam actually come from ancient Ancient "Moon" Worship such as the Crescent-Shaped Moon as shown here www.redicecreations.com...

The Real Jesus Christ of Nazareth who was not born on December 25th,but born on the First Day of the Feast of Tabernacles (15th day of Tishri ,3758, which was on Saturday, October 4th, 4 B.C. as shown here antipas.net... and died on The Feast of Passover, 14th day of Nissan 3791 which was on Friday April 7th, 30 AD www.judaismvschristianity.com..., and resurrected on the 16th Day of Nissan of Year April 9th 30 AD.

As for all the other comparisons most of which were brought to fame by Zeitgeist, a film which provides little if any proof of their claims concerning Jesus Christ and other Ancient Mythological figures such as Horus has been thoroughly debunked here conspiracies.skepticproject.com....

Horus was actually the God of the Sky; Ra was actually the Sun God, hence the "Eye of Ra" is the "Eye in the Sky" otherwise known as the Sun; Aside- The Pyramid was actually a symbol of the Rays of the Sun hitting all 4 corners of the Earth-remember the Earth was thought to be flat for many years-; Hence, the back of the dollar bill harkens back to the Egyptian Sun Worship symbolism and it's a sign that the Illuminati will conquer the whole world in the name of their god Lucifer aka the Anti-Christ aka Satan. This will be done primarily by the Roman Catholic Church and more specifically through the Jesuits ( Their logo includes the Sun and the letters IHS, which many believe to be secretly for Isis, Horus, and Set ) through their infiltration and control of Freemasonry and of every religion on Earth.

The truth is the Bible is the only book to reveal Satan's plan well in advance for your sake, so that you can prepare yourself well in advance for the deception that will occur during Last Days and not be fooled / forced into worshiping the Pope and later on the Anti-Christ. Sadly, the majority of Christians don't know, read, or study their Bible. Most people consider themselves Christians because they were baptized at birth without even knowing how to even read, speak, write, or think and let alone knowing Roman Catholicism or whatever Christian denomination was really all about (Keep in mind, Jesus Christ was baptized at the age of 30) . When these people are older they mostly don't care for knowing more about Christianity, some do just for the sake of keeping family traditions. Others, gain a genuine interest in knowing more but then are bombarded with so much information via different sources that bring up questions that no one can answer and thus they lose their faith all together.

Some actually learn their particular Christian faith and they go to Church, but the Pastor, Priest, or whoever leads the congregation only recites 1 or 2 verses and then goes on to explains the meaning of the one verse, usually taken out of context, and they never really study or read the whole Bible for themselves. If you are looking to learn more about the End Times Prophecy, read the Book of Daniel, which will define and give you signs of the End Times. Then read what Christ says concerning specific signs of the End Times in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, and then the Book Of Revelation preferably all of it but Revelation 13 and 17 are good places to start which detail the End Times specific things about the End Times. You must also be aware of world history in order to understand Bible Prophecies.

reply to post by Emergingtruth


While I appreciate your posts, you should read this thread and discuss what you say there. I will reserve my thoughts for that thread. Would love your input. Hope you will join the conversation.

Thanks kindly,
Pax

Belief In The Age Of Skepticism

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

What do I need evidence for? I am not the one making any claim against Islam.

Yet you are a self styled defender Islam. Which is unfortunate for Islam as you know next to nothing about it.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
You are intentionally misdirecting the conversation, and then you try to say that I am somehow stupid because I refuse to follow your train wreck logic?

The level of violence that Christians have been subjected to in the last 20 months at the hands of Muslims is very relevant when considering the likelihood of Christians being crucified by Muslims.

• 2012.03.04 Egypt Abu Al-Reesh. Two nuns are injured when a Muslim mob of 1500 lays siege to a Catholic school on rumors of a church building.

• 2012.01.26 Egypt Bahgourah. A Christian father and son are machine-gunned by Muslims after refusing to pay money.

• 2012.01.19 Egypt Kebly-Rahmaniya. A man and boy suffer gunshot injuries when a mob rampages through a Christian town, shouting 'Allah Akbar' and burning homes.

• 2012.06.11 Egypt Cairo. Several Christian students are injured by Muslims angered over their evangelism.

• 2011.12.29 Egypt Assiut. At least five people are hurt when a Muslim mob burns Christian homes over a Facebook cartoon.

• 2011.11.30 Egypt Ghorayzat. Two Christian brothers are murdered in cold blood by a Muslim mob rampaging through Christian homes and businesses.

• 2011.11.17 Egypt Cairo. Islamic radicals violently attack a group of Copts, marching to a memorial for slain victims of another massacre.

• 2011.10.16 Egypt Mallawy. A Coptic high school student is beaten to death after refusing to take off his cross.

• 2011.10.09 Egypt Cairo. Military and Islamist gunmen massacre over two dozen Christians peacefully protesting a church burning. 27 killed. 327 injured.

• 2011.09.29 Egypt Tamia. A guard at a church is taken out by a Muslim drive-by.

• 2011.08.08 Egypt Minya. A Christian farmer has his throat slit in front of his son by a Muslim mob, who attack Christian homes and also severely beat a pastor.

• 2011.07.29 Egypt Minya. Two Christians are taken out by snipers while riding in a car.

• 2011.07.25 Egypt Samalout. A pregnant woman is among six Christians brutally assaulted with iron rods by a Muslim mob angered over a church bell.

• 2011.06.26 Egypt Awlad Khalaf. Three Christians are injured when a Muslim mob torches eight homes on a rumor that one was to become a church.

• 2011.05.19 Egypt Cairo. Three Catholics are severely injured by a rock-throwing Muslim mob intent on preventing a church from opening.

• 2011.05.15 Egypt Cairo. About fifty Christians are injured when a Muslim mob hurls rocks and homemade bombs into a peaceful protest.

• 2011.05.15 Egypt Cairo. Two Copts are gunned down in a Muslim drive-by attack.

• 2011.05.09 Egypt Cairo. A 60-year-old Catholic grandfather is beaten to death by enraged Muslims.

• 2011.05.08 Egypt Imbaba. Islamists break into a Catholic church and slit a member's throat.

• 2011.05.08 Egypt Imbaba. Salafists shoot the 16-year-old nephew of a Catholic bishop in the head.

• 2011.05.07 Egypt Cairo. Fundamentalists assault two churches with firebombs and gunfire, killing five Copt defenders and seven more in an ensuing rampage. 232 injured.

• 2011.04.18 Egypt Minya. One Copt is killed by Muslim rioters, who throw a grandmother out of a second story balcony while shouting praises to Allah. 11 injured.

• 2011.03.20 Egypt Qena. A Christian has his ear torn off by Muslims enforcing Sharia law.

• 2011.03.09 Egypt Cairo. Nine Copts, including a child, are killed and over a hundred more injured when a Muslim mob hurls firebombs and shoots into a group protesting a church burning.

• 2011.03.04 Egypt Sol. A Muslim mob, angry over a relationship between a Muslim girl and Christian boy, kills the two fathers and burns down a church.

• 2011.02.24 Egypt Wadi el-Natroun. Two monks are among nineteen injured when military forces storm a Coptic monastery with live ammunition.

• 2011.02.23 Egypt Assiut. A priest is brutally stabbed to death in his home by killers shouting 'Allah Akbar!'

• 2011.01.30 Egypt Sharona. Very young children are among eleven members of two Coptic families shot to death in their homes at point-blank range by Islamic radicals.

• 2011.01.11 Egypt Samalout. A policeman boards a train and opens fire on a group of elderly Christians while yelling 'Allah Akbar.' A 71-year-old victim dies on the scene.

• 2011.01.01 Egypt Alexandra. Twenty-three parishioners are incinerated by a Shahid suicide bomb attack on a New Year's Day church mass. 77 injured.

www.thereligionofpeace.com...

Brutal stuff. Hard to read, but not hard to imagine happening.

Originally posted by milominderbinder

Look, I don't know if the Egyptian crucifixions took place or not. Neither do you.

You're right. So why are we not addressing that issue first and foremost. That is the topic of the thread.

Is this really about truth...or is this about pushing an agenda so that weak-willed pansies get all scared because them scary Islamacists may come get them?

You know...I love it when you get a BLATANT admission from someone that they have absolutely no idea if the event they are so horrified about and worked up over EVER HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE...and yet for some continue to debate the point as though this alleged event is an absolute fact of record.

edit on 21-8-2012 by milominderbinder because: formatting

edit on 21-8-2012 by milominderbinder because: formatting

So I take it this never really happened? These Islamaphobes are some of the most vile, lying trash I have seen. sharia law this, sharia law that, be scared and vote republican blah blah.

Originally posted by Nomadmonkey

Originally posted by milominderbinder

Look, I don't know if the Egyptian crucifixions took place or not. Neither do you.

You're right. So why are we not addressing that issue first and foremost. That is the topic of the thread.

Is this really about truth...or is this about pushing an agenda so that weak-willed pansies get all scared because them scary Islamacists may come get them?

You know...I love it when you get a BLATANT admission from someone that they have absolutely no idea if the event they are so horrified about and worked up over EVER HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE...and yet for some continue to debate the point as though this alleged event is an absolute fact of record.

edit on 21-8-2012 by milominderbinder because: formatting

edit on 21-8-2012 by milominderbinder because: formatting

So I take it this never really happened? These Islamaphobes are some of the most vile, lying trash I have seen. sharia law this, sharia law that, be scared and vote republican blah blah.

Yep. 100% B.S. None of it ever happened. Complete and utter nonsense designed to distract the American people and make sure they are good and afraid of the Muslim Boogeyman so that we can continue to bomb the piss out of the region.

www.thereligionofpeace.com...




Brutal stuff. Hard to read, but not hard to imagine happening.

Sorry dude...but here's what www.thereligionofpeace.com themselves say about their "sources"...

Link: www.thereligionofpeace.com...

"Keep in mind that only a single source is retained for each incident, even though multiple sources are often used to construct details at the time of entry. This means that the linked article may not include all of the properties of the attack, including accurate casualty figures or the identity of the victims or perpetrators. Where these exceptions occur, missing details can be gleaned from other sources.

Casualty figures often change over time as victims of Islamic terror succumb to their injuries. The retained source may or may not be updated to reflect this. On those occasions where we do decide to replace the source link, the new article may neglect other details of the attack included in our description. If you don't like this, then do your own homework."

So...what they are saying is:

"Look at all these really scary things that happened! Although we could be wrong and it could be the CHRISTIANS doing this to the Muslims, might not have really resulted in any injuries or deaths, and might not have gone down AT ALL like we "reported"....and if you don't like it...go somewhere else to obtain actual journalism other than the xenophobic rantings of lunatics that you will find here".

So why not just skip the middle man and completely ignore anything that these goofballs post as being "facts".

You should be ashamed for falling for this thinly-veiled and poorly constructed attempt at propaganda. Feel free to apologize to the thread and to humanity in general for posting such alarmist accounts of "attacks" which your own "source" says might be purely fictional and has occurred only in the imagination of the webmaster.