posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 11:29 PM
reply to post by Curious and Concerned
Very sound and logical post.
However, I would have to point out the amount of disinformation concerning the issue. When you google contrail, the top sites are full of
disinformation and major prejudice.
Heck.. the term contrail is thrown around just as bad as chemtrail ..... back in the 70's when they invented a type of Contrail Generator, they
basically said ... lets use the term "contrail" despite whether or not it's forced from the aircraft or naturally generated.
And to further complicate the issue, we have stratospheric aerosol patents that can utilize the fuel coming out of the aircraft.... meaning you don't
necessarily need nozzles on all of the planes.
Then after all that.... we look at the possibilities of what the military can do with them.... which add up pretty quick.
Eitherway ..... as a person with limitations of money and time, reading all of the scientific papers, studies on contrails, patents on aerosols, and
the whole bunch...... one can only come away from all that thinking that both exist.
This is all assuming you haven't looked at the sky your entire life....... look and observe the sky constantly and you will notice the science doesn't
match up with what's happening above you, in certain cases.
Just as "contrails" are dynamic with the weather ..... wouldn't "chemtrails" also be subject to change?
Some of us don't care to pick apart each trail in the sky ..... I'm more on the hunt for Grids and forced laying of trails in a specific geographic
area..... which could be what's in the OPs pics.
edit on 17-8-2012 by dplum517 because: (no reason given)