"They will take your guns, and no, ... you are not going to do anything about it", page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 12:38 PM by Morg234

The world does not want a disarmed American populous
reply to
post by benrl



Jesus, America probably does not want a disarmed American populous. "The world", no.


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 01:17 PM by Cosmic911
reply to post by FeatherofMaat




Yeah, keep believing that your guns mean something.

No, we'll just end up with more and more terrorist activities like the Oklahoma City Bombing. Or Columbine, or Ruby Ridge. It's no longer about the guns; the guns are just the symbols. There is a great potential in the United States to become a terrost-state. The last town I lived in was organizing a militia, this was a couple years ago. I am curious to see how that has or has not developed.
edit on 18-8-2012 by Cosmic911 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 01:41 PM by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by The Ghost Who Walks



It's called, natural progression. And, it's the same drive that forces stock traders and corporatists to continue trying to improve their bottom line. Mediocrity goes against our nature. We must constantly strive to do better. To improve, enhance, increase...
When you apply this logic to those in positions of power, it makes perfect sense. In the view of the role of government, they can't be satisfied just existing. The only happiness they can muster, is in escalation.
What is, in your mind, the role of government?
Now, take those thoughts and apply them to what politicians are currently doing, in America. Do you see any of those things, being carried out?
Laws, rules and regulations do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to reduce crime!
A criminal cares not, if there are a thousand laws, or a billion! Laws only affect the moral and law-abiding. So, if you enact more and more laws, you are ONLY performing subjugation. A form of enhancing power!
Now, have you ever heard of a law that tempers justice evenly, across the board, as well as across the aisle?
Yes, you know, the ones written a little over 200 years ago?
There was no partisan politics. They were debated, examined, abstractly applied, pondered and perhaps rewritten, but they all were for the GOOD of the common citizen.
Now, for the most part, the only time a law seems to affect everyone equally, is when we actually see bi-partisanship, and we all scratch our heads and dig a little deeper, to pay for something that no one outside of government or special interests, cares for or wants.

Anything that stands in the way of political agenda, is a threat to that agenda. And I've never...ever... seen a dog chained in the middle of a yard, that didn't have a nice circumferential groove formed, at the very end of it's tether...

edit on 8/18/2012 by GoOfYFoOt because: sp



reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 01:42 PM by jrx2020
reply to post by FeatherofMaat




LOL your funny, but keep dreaming it would work like that.


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 01:53 PM by Siberbat
Here's my theory on what could happen. If a SHTF scenario does occur, it may not go down the way most expect. Yes, military will be on patrol in the streets of america, but as a police type force. They would focus on the overt trouble makers and leave the average joe alone for the most part. Curfews would be established and those breaking curfew would be questioned and detained. Door to door searches would be unrealistic.

So, what would make us lay down our freedoms and guns? Not everyone are prepers and many have families and children to care for. Crime would be allowed to spiral out of control and things such as food and water would be strictly controlled. This will not be "sprint", per se, than a "marathon". Safe zones would be established, aka, fema camps. People will be scared and starving. So, many would voluntarilly enter the "safe zones" for food, water, and safety. The choice would be simple...expose your family to riots, looting, and gangs or seek safety in the fema camps. Many people would cave in after a couple of weeks and submit themselves to the military/government.

What would be the price for keeping your familiy safe from rape, killing, and murder? Control. You may be asked to exchange firearms for safety. You would live where told, rationed food, work details, and be tracked by biometerics. So, there would be no revolution, perhapes a resistance, many would prefer protection rather than gamble on the live of thier family and children.

What would you do? Would you face savage gangs and watch loved ones die, or turn in your weapons and cede your liberties. Of course, as history as a guide, one choice may be just as bad as the other. We would be betrayed by our fear. Our only out is God, as this exsistance passes by, but the kingdom of God is forever.

Prepare yourselves.


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 03:19 PM by Mordeen
Originally posted by DogMeat

To disarm the country will not be an easy task and most in the military and police force will not be happy to go along with it.



Not only would many officers/soldiers resist those orders, but also let's look at some fun gun facts from back in 2007 before Obama was elected and gun sales hit record highs:

The number of civilian-owned guns in the US at that time: 270,000,000

The civilian gun ownership rate per 100 citizens at that time: 88.8

SOURCE

And the numbers have only increased. These facts are the primary reasons there will be neither a sudden gun-grab by the US government nor an invasion of the US by a foreign entity.

The Founders got it right all those years ago, and anybody whom would argue against these facts are ignorant of both history, and the strength of the collective will of Americans when threatened with violence or the loss of fundamental liberties.

Yes, there are "gun nuts" out there, but they are an almost incalculably miniscule minority, compared to the millions upon millions of responsible gun owners.

-Mordeen


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 05:23 PM by Siberbat
reply to post by GoOfYFoOt


What I am saying is that many people will choose the inward facing razor wire over basically gang controlled mobs/death squads. Many of which are looking for payback aginst society. I certainly would choose to find sanctuary with like minded individuals over either of the options.

What convinced me that this could happen the way I explained, was the breakdown in L&O in New Orleans during Katrina. I use that situation as a basis for my point. People CHOSE to go to the Super Dome, the dead littered the streets, lootings and killings, patients abandoned in LTC facilities. NOPD officers abandoned thier posts as they feared for thier lives. These were first hand accounts from people who were there.

Where were the "...from my cold dead hands" types during that situation? They were ordered by the National Guard and rescue workers to leave thier homes. They did what they were told. Now imagine this on a broader scale, with dozens of cities.

I guess we don't know what we will do until we are actually IN the scenario. It's one thing to say you wouldn't give up your guns or rights; it completely another thing when your faced with the monent of truth.

I see


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 05:51 PM by Siberbat
Originally posted by Mordeen
Originally posted by DogMeat

To disarm the country will not be an easy task and most in the military and police force will not be happy to go along with it.



Not only would many officers/soldiers resist those orders, but also let's look at some fun gun facts from back in 2007 before Obama was elected and gun sales hit record highs:

The number of civilian-owned guns in the US at that time: 270,000,000

The civilian gun ownership rate per 100 citizens at that time: 88.8

SOURCE

And the numbers have only increased. These facts are the primary reasons there will be neither a sudden gun-grab by the US government nor an invasion of the US by a foreign entity.

The Founders got it right all those years ago, and anybody whom would argue against these facts are ignorant of both history, and the strength of the collective will of Americans when threatened with violence or the loss of fundamental liberties.

Yes, there are "gun nuts" out there, but they are an almost incalculably miniscule minority, compared to the millions upon millions of responsible gun owners.

-Mordeen

The assumption is that US troops would be used for the confiscation. Russian troops train all the time with ours near the army base I live. I do understand where you are coming from, however, soilders follow orders. Its what they're trained to do.

Of those 270 million gun owners, how many would be willing to place thier wives and children in a "last stand" type position?
The means may be there, however, I have to question if the will is there. I'm sure TPTB knows this.
Now I'm not anti-gun or anti-liberty, but we have to live in reality. It was a different time for our founding fathers. They were a gnat's hair away for total defeat. Do we seriously think people of this time would do any better?
The fact of the matter is, local government must be changed first, then anti-lobbyist law must be passed, finally limit terms to one term only. The system must change from the inside, and not from the barrol of a gun.


reply posted on 18-8-2012 @ 07:40 PM by madenusa
reply to post by Siberbat



if it comes down to fight or fly, i will choose run.take my guns..
im no match for our war dogs. Marines
they love to fight
i know i will have my fun with sweet revenge,lol


reply posted on 19-8-2012 @ 12:14 AM by DARKFANG009
reply to post by DaTroof



all i can say is if we needs guns to hunt for our food then what? im not giving mine up witrhout a fight screw the government....


reply posted on 19-8-2012 @ 12:16 AM by jihadoflove
reply to post by Dreine



I think a mylar "space blanket" (the heat reflective emergency type) sewed into a black hooded poncho of sufficeint length might work. Theory being... your body heat would be reflected/blocked. Want to experiment but no access to FLIR
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



UN Proposes Tax On Americans for 3rd world countries
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Armed bystander stops stabbing outside school
  Posted 12 days ago with 27 member flags
" Climate Change Is Not A Hoax", says Obama!!??
  Posted 4 days ago with 21 member flags
Former Arizona Sheriff Mack, ‘Gun Control Against the Law’
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags
Limiting Freedom & It\'s Effects On Society
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags