posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 11:23 AM
That is just another inflammatory article meant to piss off even further those of us who already are, and have been stating so for years. But in order
for them to do this, it immediately implies several things. First, the second amendment would have to be overturned. Because if they ban guns
completely without doing that, then there is no question who the enemies of the people and of the constitution are at that point. And that includes
those that would blindly follow orders to enforce it.
The other problem is that banning guns will severely affect a whole lot of military themselves, and they better realize that the very act of doing
this will likely split the military branches itself in half. And so now you have the one side who says "no way", and the other ready to invade
America for the cleansing.
Let them ban guns. Ha. Let them try. It would be an immediate civil war. And a civil war that will be fought with all or most of the current gun
owners (millions), supplemented by veterans, and current military who would defect- and likely take some pretty serious weapons including tanks and
planes and all kinds of things- with them.
It would be suicide for the government to try anything of the sort, imo.