It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ypperst
Its always fun to read such things.
But it does not surprise me, that there were some people who was considering the possibility.
But the problem with Ufology, is that, when you see something unexplained, it could be tourists from outer space, but it could as well (99% more likely) be some nature phenomenon.
Such as, you know ball lightning, they are pretty rare. So, when you see that, what will you call it? A ufo or a nature phenomenon, such as ball lightning.
And yes, I do know what UFO stands for. But I also know that when 95% people say 'UFO' they hope/mean something intelligent from outer space.
Originally posted by Orkojoker
The following is taken from a memo dated October 27, 1952, written by Alan H. Belmont, then head of the Domestic Intelligence Division of the FBI:
Alan H. Belmont
The "creditable and unexplainable" sighting referenced is the now-famous Newhouse UFO incident, which produced the footage below.
What interests me most in this memo is the quality of language used by Belmont, which is based on information received from Colonel C.M. Young, Executive Officer to Major General John A. Samford, Director of Air Force Intelligence. For instance, the possibility of interplanetary ships is not only being considered - it is being "seriously" considered.
The memo goes on to point out that a small percentage of reports investigated by the Air Force are "extremely creditable" and "unexplainable". The Newhouse case is included in this group of extremely creditable reports, and it is noted that conventional explanations have been "completely ruled out" and that the Air Force is "at a complete loss to explain this most recent creditable sighting".
Here's the document in its entirety:
Just thought I would throw this out there for your consideration as an example of internal government correspondence regarding UFOs circa 1952.
Originally posted by Orkojoker
The following is taken from a memo dated October 27, 1952, written by Alan H. Belmont, then head of the Domestic Intelligence Division of the FBI:
but it could as well (99% more likely) be some nature phenomenon.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
I would expect someone would consider the possibility...
...but what did they conclude?
Interesting thread. They had something that was unknown. If you make a list of all possibilities, irrespective of the estimated probabilities, lots of stuff can end up on the list.
Originally posted by Orkojoker
Good question. It's likely that they didn't really conclude anything. There were a variety of opinions on the phenomenon within the military and intelligence communities at this time, and it seems that the decision made by the policy makers was to publicly downplay any evidence of a threat to national security.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
The word "interplanetary" is particularly revealing, and to me suggests a possibility of intelligence from Mars or Venus, which in 1952, I don't think had been ruled out yet. Eventually, it became apparent that if there was other life in our solar system, it was much more likely to be of the nature of the extremophiles found on Earth, meaning single-celled and not intelligent.
ABSTRACT Upon becoming aware of the explosion of reports of anomalous aerial phenomena over the United States in the summer of 1947, the U.S. Air Force became alarmed and instituted emergency studies of the “flying disks.” Quickly this task was delegated to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base’s intelligence division, and in January 1948 became a formal project, Sign. Sign investigated the phenomenon for seven months and decided that it was best explained by the extraterrestrial (spacecraft) hypothesis (ETH). An Estimate was produced for the Pentagon giving reasons for this.
Elements of very high rank in the Pentagon would not accept this, and their refusal led to a major debate on the ETH, which resulted in the ultimate breakup of the Project Sign team and the destruction of all (with perhaps one exception) copies of the document.
This early confrontation set the tone for USAF behavior toward UFOs for the next two years and, after a brief respite in the era of Capt. Edward Ruppelt, until the complete cessation of the formal USAF project on the phenomenon in 1969.