It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by AussieDingus
In your opinion, he may not be a "warrior", but as we all know it takes a real man to walk away from a no-win situation, and who, other than the wealthy few are winning ???
He is an adult, presumably he was when he enlisted (I guess his parents could have signed when he was 17); if he joined after 2001 he knew he'd be going to war and that meant killing people and possibly dying. He entered into a contract that required his obedience to authority and surrender to a mission (or future missions) over which he would have zero control or input. In exchange he received (if he's a HS graduate) a more than fair compensation package for his part.
Originally posted by AussieDingus
There has been many "warriors" injured in action serving their country, yet when they return they have to fight for every cent of entitlement for the rest of their lives. That’s hardly a worthy way of a country treating its "warriors".
I have yet to meet anyone with a diagnosable and identifiable wartime injury who had to fight for VA compensation. I know some who have the less obvious type injuries PTSD to be one have some problems getting compensation. That is not what that kid was ranting about -- he was ranting about having to follow orders and hurt people and see his friends hurt. Sounds like butt-hurt to me, what did he think war was about?
Originally posted by AussieDingus
And by consuming the real air warriors need, does that include the agent orange sprayed on your own warriors by your own government ? Does that include all your warriors now suffering from Gulf war syndrome ?
Again, nothing to do with the young man's feel sorry for himself rant.
Originally posted by AussieDingus
But if those "warriors" spoke up, would they then become whiners, liberal stooges and certain parts of the female body as well ?
Speaking up is one thing - making yourself sound like some kind of victim doesn't help anyone. People on you tube don't run the VA, make law or pass out entitlements. Complain to the right people in private or sound like a wuss... Just my opinion.
Originally posted by AussieDingusAnd when most logical thinking people can easily see that this "war" is an invasion, based purely on installing puppet governements to allow the rping of that countries natural resources.
It's a no-win situation except for those making the profit from pre-planned wars and invasions. And as i said before, a real man will walk away from that situation !
IMO a soldier that has the courage to stand up and speak out against the very system that sends its youth to fight an illegal invasion just for their own profit and benefit is way more of a man than a soldier that goes were he/she is told, kills who he/she is told to kill and all without question and class it as "following orders".
Originally posted by Golf66
Negative, you do not understand. The concept of national defense cannot be realized without a little national offense. To have a robust defense one must have wars in which to participate to hone the skills, train the leaders and to test the newest technology.
You see the small wars in which we engage as "aggression" and "profiteering" for the mighty military industrial complex. In a way you are correct - certainly these entities stand to gain a great deal; however, to discount the net benefit to the nation for their profiteering (that is what companies do BTW - we don't fault the fish for swimming) is akin to throwing out the baby with the bathwater. The water is dirty and no one likes having dirty water around but the baby is our future.
I (and the others in the profession of arms) see them as live fire training for our baby so that we can have competent Generals and competent Colonel's should for some reason the US mainland itself come under threat. Leaders are born in some certain sense but the tactics and techniques of modern warfare are a darn cite more complicated than the "get on line load and fire" of our minute man past. It takes a lifetime of professional schooling interspersed with some live action training (limited warfare or COIN etc.) to make a good leader.
Should we just sit around and hope the new bombs work like they did on the target dummies? Or hope that General Brown does as well with real Soldiers as he does with the flags on a map? The small military we maintain now will be but the nucleus of the larger force should we face all out threat to our nation. A Captain will find himself a LTC quickly and given a formation of draftees and newly minted LT's to execute his mission. Thank god at least he's seen someone get in a firefight before...or we'll get a lot of young men and women killed while he learns.
So perhaps pawn in a game is true maybe in a way but we certainly disagree who the chess master really is. You think it’s the military profiteers. I think they are just the Kings and Queens, they are still on the board - the real player is national defense.
It is likely we will never agree so let’s not derail this here. National defense is a very complicated thing - people spend their whole careers in its study and still get things wrong.
I doubt some arm chair generals or in my case Special Forces Major are not going to be able to get a good discussion going. What I do know is that an Army that never fights is not much of an Army at all.
All hat - no cowboy as they say where I am from...
Like the previous soldiers, you share their mindset that the nature of man makes it necessary to have wars. That war leads to peace, or at least allows you to kill the assigned amount of humans so you are allowed to go home to your family.
You guys are very similar in your mindsets, and that is why you are good soldiers. And Im sure I seem quite weird and stupid to you, because you just dont see that your actions, in the grand scheme of things, are causing a massive amount of pain for so many humans on the planet.
Originally posted by USpatriot
There will be a day when vets and patriots will step up and defend their country from tyranny. Vets are not terrorists. The people in DC are though.
The election this year is the most critical one ever. Be Prepared.
Originally posted by dave_welch
I can't believe that I may be considered a "possible terrorist" due to my service to this country. God help us all.
Originally posted by AussieDingus I believe "part of the problem, or part of the solution" is the best description i can think of to explain it. No citizen has forced any soldier to enlist, but the military hierarchy forces you to fight in wars that you may personally believe to be lacking in morals and/or ethics.
Originally posted by AussieDingus
I don't put a soldier ahead of any other person that works a job for a living. Nor do i think any less of them. But the reality is, soldiers would have nothing to defend if we were all in the military, and then there would be no one working the jobs that get taxed to then fund things like the military and the wages of those serving in it.
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by AussieDingus I believe "part of the problem, or part of the solution" is the best description i can think of to explain it. No citizen has forced any soldier to enlist, but the military hierarchy forces you to fight in wars that you may personally believe to be lacking in morals and/or ethics.
You do realize that following an illegal order is...illegal also. Taking that into consideration some orders are obviously illegal - go kill those kids for instance. Most orders are not - go to Iraq and perform X mission because the Commander in Chief says it’s in the national interests of the US is not an illegal order.
Originally posted by AussieDingus
I don't put a soldier ahead of any other person that works a job for a living. Nor do i think any less of them. But the reality is, soldiers would have nothing to defend if we were all in the military, and then there would be no one working the jobs that get taxed to then fund things like the military and the wages of those serving in it.
If you expect a Soldier to take the moral high ground and quit his profession and end his source of livelyhood and income because of a mission he doesn't like or risk going to jail for not executing an order with which he disagrees then you do the same and just stop paying your taxes.
What will happen to you? Maybe go to jail, prabably at least pay a heavy fine (and the taxes after racking up lawyer fees etc.) which will affect your family's quality of life.
Same thing will happen to the Soldier for not following his rules.
Lives to live, families to feed and all that can't be done from prison. It’s a practical matter more than a moral one.
Originally posted by AussieDingus
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by AussieDingusWhat amazes me is, how many people on here claim to serve in the military, but then come onto a conspricay site. To be on a conspiracy site in the first place, one must of at one stage or another realised that the official story is a lie, and that soldiers today are, sadly, nothing more than potential cannon fodder for those making the profits from those illegal wars. I do feel sorry for those soldiers because many don't have the education or intelligence to see the lies, but those that are educated and intelligent get little sympathy from me as they should have the intelligence to see through the lies.
Thanks for your opinion !
Many of us joined because we needed the job, there's not much out there for an uneducated 20 year old. Some of us couldn't afford college either, the G.I. bill takes care of that. Also, if you want to know things, what better way than in the military with a security clearance. But I digress, Very few people actually believe the government 100%. Sometimes you have to do things you don't agree with for your family, and yourself.
Originally posted by dave_welch
Originally posted by AussieDingus
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by AussieDingusWhat amazes me is, how many people on here claim to serve in the military, but then come onto a conspricay site. To be on a conspiracy site in the first place, one must of at one stage or another realised that the official story is a lie, and that soldiers today are, sadly, nothing more than potential cannon fodder for those making the profits from those illegal wars. I do feel sorry for those soldiers because many don't have the education or intelligence to see the lies, but those that are educated and intelligent get little sympathy from me as they should have the intelligence to see through the lies.
Thanks for your opinion !
Many of us joined because we needed the job, there's not much out there for an uneducated 20 year old. Some of us couldn't afford college either, the G.I. bill takes care of that. Also, if you want to know things, what better way than in the military with a security clearance. But I digress, Very few people actually believe the government 100%. Sometimes you have to do things you don't agree with for your family, and yourself.
I underdstand why many joined, and it also goes along way to explaining why the military usually have their biggest amount of recruits coming from the poorest, and lowest educated area's. If these current wars were just, legal and even logical, there would be roughly an equal number of people enlisting nationwide from all areas. But when wars are unjust, illegal and have little logic, then its no wonder the majority being sent to fight these wars seem to come from the poorer areas with the lowest education levels. But you always have a choice, admittingly the choices are limited as far as career options go, but there is always still the choice to not take part and to try other avenues. I didn't join the military and also couldn't afford to go to university. I've also had to go through 3 career changes in just the last 10 years with gaps of unemployment between jobs.
And yes, joining the military and gaining a secuirty clearance would help to "know things", but i've learnt enough things about what todays military is really all about without having to enlist to find it out.
You say "sometimes you have to do things you don't agree with for your family, and yourself", but here's the thing................what if you teach you children and family about the dangers of drugs such as herion for example, but then you are sent to Afghanistan to protect one of the many poppy/opium fileds owned and run by the CIA, so it can continue on its way selling herion throughout the world, all under the banner of "the war on terror", and "protecting the USA's interests" ???? Isn't that basically saying "don't touch drugs kids, especially herion, but now daddy has to go and 'serve' over seas to protect over 90% of the worlds herion supply ??? Isn't that basically being a hypocrite [not you personally, but in general] ??? And what if you're asked to follow orders in a situation of martial law, and one of the orders you're given is to round up citizens in your own country, and some of those citizens you have to round up are your other family members and friends [or will miliatry family members be given safe haven in advance ?], would you still do what you didn't agree with, for yourself and your own military career, which ultimately was for your family, or do you go AWOL and get home to help your family ???
Maybe if more people were more honest about why they are really in the military, the sooner we would get a stop to all this "i'm serving to protect my country and its citizens" talk. The reality is, most serving today are serving because enlisting was either, the easiest, or best option to earn a paycheque due to their financial, career and/or educational options at the time. And when people are serving for a paycheque, then those paycheques have to keep coming in, and as long as that keeps happening, so do the illegal wars to help keep those paycheques coming in. If the wars stop, then all of a sudden theres not as big a need for as many soldiers, and then all of a sudden for many the paycheques stop coming in.
And then they have to make a choice, just like they did when enlisting....................circles anyone ????