It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JamesGC
In my opinion Assange isn't really all that, a bit of a poser, BUT there is something about him that draws me to him. Somewhat charasmatic.
I tell you, he'll be pretty safe today. i mean if he just, oh accidently did something stupid and he died could you imagine the outrage. i mean we remember the riots in England last year? The man has a lot of followers. Call them what you want.
Really wanted an early night tonight, but i notice ABC Australia is covering it. Some action would be interesting.
The FM said that if Assange was extradited to the U.S., he would be tried by a military tribunal. He says that Assange must answer to allegations in Sweden but has not been afforded his full rights in the case.
"Asylum ... is a human privilege that is fundamental... based on the foundation of human protection, and their should be no distinction... Asylum belongs to the set of rules that should be recognized at an international level and it overrides local regulations."
The FM said that the rights for political asylum, citing several international pieces of legislation, override any other treaty that opposes them.
"The government of Ecuador wants to highlight that the rules stated in these tools are above any ... local regulations. Based on intangible rights and values, against unilateral attitudes by states, this should strengthen international politics."
He says the UK never showed a willingness to reach an agreement.
"Ecuador made it clear to Sweden that we wanted to have an interview with them and we didn't want to interfere with whatever is happening there. Sweden didn't accept our proposal. Ecuador requested some guarantees from Sweden that Assange would not be [sent] to the United States, and they denied."
"We trust that the UK will offer the necessary guarantees so that both governments can act properly, respecting international rights and the rights of asylum. And we trust that the excellent relationship between the two countries will remain intact."
Originally posted by JamesGC
In my opinion Assange isn't really all that, a bit of a poser, BUT there is something about him that draws me to him. Somewhat charasmatic.
I tell you, he'll be pretty safe today. i mean if he just, oh accidently did something stupid and he died could you imagine the outrage. i mean we remember the riots in England last year? The man has a lot of followers. Call them what you want.
Really wanted an early night tonight, but i notice ABC Australia is covering it. Some action would be interesting.
Originally posted by johncarter
reply to post by insaan
These are pre-reminiscent signs like the ones before the great collapse 1929. Our politicians have gone totally insane. The people that elects them in a split second cant be said to be much wiser. The banks steal everything in sight and when a source like Assange tries to show this and requests asylum...the public demands him thrown to the lions just to enjoy a brief spectacle.
Can you spell "the last days of Rome"?
edit on 16-8-2012 by johncarter because: (no reason given)edit on 16-8-2012 by johncarter because: (no reason given)edit on 16-8-2012 by johncarter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Milkflavour
Originally posted by wiser3
I am not saying the man is innocent or guilty but
Is the man really REALLY guilty of the crime of rape?
To my untrained brain the only answer I can give is an emphatic NO!
At the time of the initial report there may have been insufficient evidence, now there MAY be sufficient evidence or new questions as a result of new information from an ongoing investogation, that they need to ask him.... If not, then why are Sweden looking to have him retured there?
Like I said above, maybe Equador have a damn good reason to believe (as in more than just suspicion, actual evidence maybe?) that there are no charges to be answered and that this is political... In which case they should lay it all out on the table and make their case publicly. That's my distinctly uninformed opinion on the matter anyway. I'm sure it's much more complex than that...
Originally posted by magma
So the next news we hear is he resisted arrest, pulled a gun and was subsequentially shot dead inside the embassy.
Watch this space
Originally posted by pheonix358
If they go in and get him, the world is likely to resound with the blowback! Every country on earth knows you don't forcibly go in to someones Embassy. This could lead to the dissolution of all Embassies on a global scale. That would be an end to real diplomacy.
........
The PM , nowhere in sight, will have to find a scapegoat if this ends badly. Now, who will that be I wonder! Talk about political suicide.
P
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by FFS4000
This is so wrong on so many levels, if we go in we are technically invading another country.
No, it isn't at all. The Embassy remains British territory at all times.
Originally posted by hadriana
...
This could be a HUGE misstep for Obama. Republicans could paint him as trying to hard to be strong that he damages peace by ignoring law and decorum. Of course they don't have a stellar record on those things either, because they'd have killed Bin Ladin without a trial and were the ones on TV yelling let's go murder Assange.
Could be a total disaster. And for what? What are the motives to enter this particular standoff? Do they make sense? Are they wise? Are they based on personal feelings (embarrassment, ambition, revenge) or some moral principle?
Originally posted by johncarter
reply to post by bjarneorn
Assange has something this elite desperatly wants to erase. Something really bad and for which they are ready to end diplomatic relations with greater part of South America and even start a war if necessary.edit on 16-8-2012 by johncarter because: (no reason given)