It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
So are saying you think dead people can get up and walk around?
Or do you think it more likely (if the Jesus story has some basis of truth) that he simply wasn't dead in the first place? A clarification of positions would be helpful here (please).
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
Hmm, in that case then i highly disagree with the resurrection. Just not probable or possible. However, each to their own i suppose.....
I don't buy into the whole son of god thing either though to be honest. If there is proper historical basis in the story, for me it has been to be in the context of man with ideas that gained popularity, resulting in a movement which morphs into a religion. To me that would be far more realistic.
I get the impression though that you have a totally different opinion!
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
Because dead people don't get up and walk around. Black and white for me but then i have absolutely no belief in the supernatural. That is not to say that weird things do not happen (people seeing ghosts, etc) but for me this is more electrical / magnetic resonance on the brain than anything God like or spiritual.
Being civil though as i respect people's religious beliefs (who am i say you are wrong?) - and we appear to have wildly different ones! Of course, if i am wrong then i probably have a hot afterlife waiting for me!
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
Basically because we operate on electrical pulse through our bodies, as well as being walking chemical factories. If things upset the balance (such as strong ground based magnetic charge in an area) it disrupts how our processes properly function, ie we can see things (that aren't there in reality).
I firmly believe this to be the case. However, i also accept that i may be wrong and there could be something behind it all - i just don't believe it. We are the result of random chance and evolution (to me), which kind of makes the reality of our world that bit more surreal - given that we are random chance life, how have we got to the point of working and paying taxes? Seems wrong somehow.........
I like religion for providing mankind with the tools to live a better, happier life (helping each other). That is invaluable in my opinion. I just don't buy into the mumbo jumbo associated with religion (sorry if that word is provocative, no offence intended).
We are the result of random chance and evolution (to me), which kind of makes the reality of our world that bit more surreal - given that we are random chance life, how have we got to the point of working and paying taxes? Seems wrong somehow.........
Joseph says: And why do you wonder that Jesus has risen? But it is wonderful that He has not risen alone, but that He has also raised many others of the dead who have appeared in Jerusalem to many.
O Lord Jesus Christ, the resurrection and the life of the world, grant us grace that we may give an account of Your resurrection, and Your miracles which You did in Hades. We then were in Hades, with all who had fallen asleep since the beginning of the world. And at the hour of midnight there rose a light as if of the sun, and shone into these dark regions; and we were all lighted up, and saw each other. And straightway our father Abraham was united with the patriarchs and the prophets, and at the same time they were filled with joy, and said to each other: This light is from a great source of light. The prophet Hesaias, who was there present, said: This light is from the Father, and from the Son, and from the Holy Spirit; about whom I prophesied when yet alive, saying, The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim, the people that sat in darkness, have seen a great light. Isaiah 9:1-2
Then there came into the midst another, an ascetic from the desert; and the patriarchs said to him: Who are you? And he said: I am John, the last of the prophets, who made the paths of the Son of God straight,
All these things we saw and heard; we, the two brothers, who also have been sent by Michael the archangel, and have been ordered to proclaim the resurrection of the Lord, but first to go away to the Jordan and to be baptized. Thither also we have gone, and have been baptized with the rest of the dead who have risen. Thereafter also we came to Jerusalem, and celebrated the passover of the resurrection
www.newadvent.org...
Originally posted by bibledefender
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
Basically because we operate on electrical pulse through our bodies, as well as being walking chemical factories. If things upset the balance (such as strong ground based magnetic charge in an area) it disrupts how our processes properly function, ie we can see things (that aren't there in reality).
I firmly believe this to be the case. However, i also accept that i may be wrong and there could be something behind it all - i just don't believe it. We are the result of random chance and evolution (to me), which kind of makes the reality of our world that bit more surreal - given that we are random chance life, how have we got to the point of working and paying taxes? Seems wrong somehow.........
I like religion for providing mankind with the tools to live a better, happier life (helping each other). That is invaluable in my opinion. I just don't buy into the mumbo jumbo associated with religion (sorry if that word is provocative, no offence intended).
None taken!
At least you are honest..
Just because we operate on electircal impulses, that in no way implies that is all that there is.
We are the result of random chance and evolution (to me), which kind of makes the reality of our world that bit more surreal - given that we are random chance life, how have we got to the point of working and paying taxes? Seems wrong somehow.........
Maybe, just maybe it is because we are not the product of chance/evolution.
Originally posted by Flavian
Originally posted by bibledefender
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
Basically because we operate on electrical pulse through our bodies, as well as being walking chemical factories. If things upset the balance (such as strong ground based magnetic charge in an area) it disrupts how our processes properly function, ie we can see things (that aren't there in reality).
I firmly believe this to be the case. However, i also accept that i may be wrong and there could be something behind it all - i just don't believe it. We are the result of random chance and evolution (to me), which kind of makes the reality of our world that bit more surreal - given that we are random chance life, how have we got to the point of working and paying taxes? Seems wrong somehow.........
I like religion for providing mankind with the tools to live a better, happier life (helping each other). That is invaluable in my opinion. I just don't buy into the mumbo jumbo associated with religion (sorry if that word is provocative, no offence intended).
None taken!
At least you are honest..
Just because we operate on electircal impulses, that in no way implies that is all that there is.
We are the result of random chance and evolution (to me), which kind of makes the reality of our world that bit more surreal - given that we are random chance life, how have we got to the point of working and paying taxes? Seems wrong somehow.........
Maybe, just maybe it is because we are not the product of chance/evolution.
So God is like an intergalactic taxman? No wonder i'm not a fan!
Seriously though, this is an interesting topic but until i have my own supernatural moment i will never believe in the literal bible. It may be a fault of mine but there it is.
I honestly think aspects of the bible are rooted in history. For example the exodus is accepted as historical fact. There are now even links being excavated to the story of Samson. But i don't for a second believe in the feeding of the 5'000 (as it is told) or walking on water on any of that side of the bible. I would need proof but i honestly don't see how that side could ever be proved. That may be a serious character flaw i have or it may be a seriously useful aspect of my character - who is to say?
Would love to have an actual debate (moderated one at that) with you. But time is limited.
Actually it is not Craig's argument, it is Mike Licona and Gary Habermas'. I just think it is a great argument and use it.
Originally posted by eight bits
mkmasn
Thank you for the kind words.
bibledefender
Would love to have an actual debate (moderated one at that) with you. But time is limited.
I understand. So many heathens, so little time . My post really was just a comment on the issues that came up during your exchange with mkmsn.
Actually it is not Craig's argument, it is Mike Licona and Gary Habermas'. I just think it is a great argument and use it.
It's not my intention to referee a priority dispute among the God Squad. I said it was WLC's "set piece" because I saw him use his version of it repeatedly, for example, here on his website:
www.reasonablefaith.org...
www.reasonablefaith.org...
www.reasonablefaith.org...
I happily defer to you if you know that he got the approach from somebody else. In the case before us, I did acknowledge that you had adapted it somewhat, and we do seem to be in agreement that it is not entirely original with you, which is fine.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by bibledefender
Proof for me would be witnessing something "supernatural" and having no doubts there wasn't a rational explanation for it. For example, someone walking on water - i would have to be certain it wasn't trickery (such as Dynamo did). That would then open me up to the possibility of the supernatural actually being based in reality.
Basically, i want to see something and then make sure science can't explain it in alternative ways. Does that make sense? I mean, to me, if someone thousands of years ago saw something shooting across the sky they would be thinking on the lines of the gods moving about (or whatever). Nowadays, we would be thinking comet. I realise this isn't the best example to illustrate my point but hopefully you get where i'm coming from! Basically, my point is that if the bible is based in fact, it has entirely become mumbo jumbified (new word - go with it! ) as the years have gone on.
Well then what about the testimony of the witnesses to the resurrection?
Basically, i want to see something and then make sure science can't explain it in alternative ways.